Today's hottest deals

Asrock FM2A68M-DG3+

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 8%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 56%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 6%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (85th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 15 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 51.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics15.7% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 15 years and 3 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.
MotherboardAsrock FM2A68M-DG3+  (all builds)
Memory5.4 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.9 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colores
OSWindows 7
BIOS Date20160112
Uptime0 Days
Run DateOct 19 '18 at 20:44
Run Duration138 Seconds
Run User ARG-User
Background CPU4%

 PC Performing above expectations (85th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD A8-7650K APU (2014 D.Ka)
CPUSocket, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.3 GHz
Performing way above expectations (94th percentile)
51.8% Above average
Memory 71.1
1-Core 62.6
2-Core 108
50% 80.7 Pts
4-Core 189
8-Core 192
25% 190 Pts
64-Core 185
11% 185 Pts
Poor: 31%
This bench: 51.8%
Great: 53%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD HD 7770
Sapphire(174B E244) 1GB
CLim: 1100 MHz, MLim: 1250 MHz, Ram: 1GB, Driver: 18.10.1
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
15.7% Very poor
Lighting 19.7
Reflection 18.6
Parallax 24.9
16% 21.1 fps
MRender 15.3
Gravity 18
Splatting 20.9
15% 18.1 fps
Poor: 11%
This bench: 15.7%
Great: 14%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
WD Blue 1TB (2012)-$37
330GB free
Firmware: 01.0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 192 189 183 181 187 188 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (90th percentile)
105% Outstanding
Read 180
Write 181
Mixed 109
SusWrite 187
120% 164 MB/s
4K Read 1.4
4K Write 2.9
4K Mixed 1.1
234% 1.8 MB/s
Poor: 52%
This bench: 105%
Great: 109%
WD Blue 500GB (2010)-$22
279GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 15.0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 107 105 104 101 108 106 MB/s
Performing as expected (55th percentile)
55.6% Above average
Read 88.6
Write 102
Mixed 64.7
SusWrite 105
66% 90.1 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 1.9
4K Mixed 0.7
138% 1.07 MB/s
Poor: 24%
This bench: 55.6%
Great: 69%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown N3D08I1866B-512N 1x8GB
1 of 2 slots used
8GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1866 MHz
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
26.3% Poor
MC Read 9.9
MC Write 8.1
MC Mixed 8.1
25% 8.7 GB/s
SC Read 7.5
SC Write 7.2
SC Mixed 8.3
22% 7.67 GB/s
Latency 98.8
40% 98.8 ns
Poor: 26%
This bench: 26.3%
Great: 33%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical FM2A68M-DG3+ Builds (Compare 555 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 9%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 46%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 8%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: Asrock FM2A68M-DG3+

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 23% - Poor Total price: $25
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $165Nvidia RTX 4060 $295WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $389WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $85
Intel Core i5-13600K $200Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback