Today's hottest deals

Fujitsu CELSIUS R670-2

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 31%
Sail boat
Desktop
Desktop 77%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 29%
Raft
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (77th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 23 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 73%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics36.3% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive62.7% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory36GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 36GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
6 years ago, 6 years ago.
SystemFujitsu CELSIUS R670-2  (all builds)
MotherboardFUJITSU D2618-C1
Memory31.9 GB free of 36 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1920x1080x4294967296 szín
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20111219
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateOct 18 '18 at 20:10
Run Duration186 Seconds
Run User HUN-User
Background CPU3%

 PC Performing above expectations (77th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
1st CPU: Intel Xeon X5650
CPU 1, 2 CPU, 12 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 2.65 GHz, turbo 2.9 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (99th percentile)
73% Very good
Memory 93
1-Core 76.6
2-Core 150
65% 107 Pts
4-Core 286
8-Core 593
52% 440 Pts
64-Core 881
54% 881 Pts
Poor: 51%
This bench: 73%
Great: 71%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD R9 380-$200
CLim: 1010 MHz, MLim: 1450 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 18.9.2
Performing way above expectations (99th percentile)
36.3% Below average
Lighting 45.6
Reflection 50.8
Parallax 54.6
37% 50.3 fps
MRender 51.1
Gravity 40.9
Splatting 37
34% 43 fps
Poor: 31%
This bench: 36.3%
Great: 35%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 840 Evo 120GB-$85
74GB free (System drive)
Firmware: EXT0DB6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 155 150 128 144 146 145 MB/s
Performing below potential (6th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
62.7% Good
Read 239
Write 232
Mixed 209
SusWrite 145
46% 206 MB/s
4K Read 26.1
4K Write 53.9
4K Mixed 35
113% 38.3 MB/s
DQ Read 204
DQ Write 193
DQ Mixed 148
125% 182 MB/s
Poor: 63%
This bench: 62.7%
Great: 108%
WD Green 1TB (2010)-$139
220GB free
Firmware: 0A80
SusWrite @10s intervals: 52 54 53 54 54 54 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (8th percentile)
29.9% Poor
Read 50.5
Write 51.3
Mixed 48.5
SusWrite 53.4
38% 50.9 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 1.3
4K Mixed 0.4
94% 0.77 MB/s
Poor: 29%
This bench: 29.9%
Great: 59%
Lsilogic Logical Volume 498GB
464GB free
Firmware: 3000
SusWrite @10s intervals: 205 202 204 207 207 205 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
117% Outstanding
Read 205
Write 200
Mixed 66
SusWrite 205
123% 169 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 2.3
4K Mixed 1.2
209% 1.43 MB/s
Poor: 68%
This bench: 117%
Great: 117%
Lsilogic Logical Volume 1TB
931GB free
Firmware: 3000
SusWrite @10s intervals: 174 175 179 179 177 182 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (95th percentile)
123% Outstanding
Read 250
Write 223
Mixed 86.5
SusWrite 178
134% 184 MB/s
4K Read 1.2
4K Write 4.1
4K Mixed 1.1
248% 2.13 MB/s
Poor: 31%
This bench: 123%
Great: 123%
WD WD5000AVVS-63H0B1 500GB
466GB free
Firmware: 0A01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 98 99 99 99 100 99 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (99th percentile)
55.6% Above average
Read 94.5
Write 94.2
Mixed 69
SusWrite 99
66% 89.2 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 2.4
4K Mixed 0.6
132% 1.17 MB/s
Poor: 18%
This bench: 55.6%
Great: 51%
ADATA USB Flash Drive 16GB
11GB free, PID cb10
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 11 13 13 5 9.5 13 MB/s
Performing above expectations (85th percentile)
8.2% Terrible
Read 25.5
Write 6.7
Mixed 10.2
SusWrite 10.7
15% 13.3 MB/s
4K Read 4
4K Write 0.4
4K Mixed 0.3
39% 1.57 MB/s
Poor: 3%
This bench: 8.2%
Great: 11%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 36GB
null MHz
4096, 2048, 4096, 2048, 4096, 2048, 4096, 2048, 4096, 2048, 4096, 2048 MB
Performing way above expectations (98th percentile)
60.6% Good
MC Read 27.6
MC Write 15.5
MC Mixed 26.4
66% 23.2 GB/s
SC Read 9.4
SC Write 5.8
SC Mixed 7.5
22% 7.57 GB/s
Latency 62.1
64% 62.1 ns
Poor: 8%
This bench: 60.6%
Great: 53%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical CELSIUS R670-2 Builds (Compare 75 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 15%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 65%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 15%
Tree trunk

System: Fujitsu CELSIUS R670-2

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 9% - Terrible Total price: $440
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $159Nvidia RTX 4060 $280WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-13600K $210Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $389WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $84
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $370
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback