MSI MS-16P1

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 64%
Destroyer
Desktop
Desktop 79%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 55%
Yacht
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (50th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 50 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 74%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics82.1% is a very good 3D score, it's the business. This GPU can handle recent 3D games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive81.5% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (20%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
5 years ago, 5 years ago.
SystemMicro-Star GE63VR 7RF
MotherboardMSI MS-16P1  (all builds)
Memory7.4 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20170605
Uptime0.4 Days
Run DateOct 16 '18 at 08:00
Run Duration143 Seconds
Run User RUS-User
Background CPU 20%

 PC Performing as expected (50th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-7700HQ
U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 2.8 GHz, turbo 3.4 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (98th percentile)
74% Very good
Memory 83.6
1-Core 96.7
2-Core 186
71% 122 Pts
4-Core 348
8-Core 571
56% 459 Pts
64-Core 578
36% 578 Pts
Poor: 38%
This bench: 74%
Great: 73%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1070 (Mobile)
MSI(1462 11F7) ≥ 4GB
Driver: nvldumdx.dll Ver. 25.21.14.1634
Performing way above expectations (96th percentile)
82.1% Excellent
Lighting 104
Reflection 116
Parallax 89.7
85% 103 fps
MRender 91.3
Gravity 91.5
Splatting 97.7
77% 93.5 fps
Poor: 48%
This bench: 82.1%
Great: 82%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Toshiba THNSNJ256G8NY 256GB
83GB free (System drive)
Firmware: JYXA0101
SusWrite @10s intervals: 363 157 116 94 109 104 MB/s
Performing above expectations (61st percentile)
81.5% Excellent
Read 474
Write 429
Mixed 417
SusWrite 157
83% 369 MB/s
4K Read 22.9
4K Write 77
4K Mixed 38.8
125% 46.2 MB/s
DQ Read 321
DQ Write 293
DQ Mixed 319
236% 311 MB/s
Poor: 50%
This bench: 81.5%
Great: 98%
HGST Travelstar 7K1000 2.5" 1TB
651GB free
Firmware: JB0OA3U0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 81 77 85 82 81 86 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (12th percentile)
41.8% Average
Read 63.5
Write 92.7
Mixed 23.2
SusWrite 82.2
47% 65.4 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 1
4K Mixed 0.4
88% 0.67 MB/s
Poor: 35%
This bench: 41.8%
Great: 75%
Hitachi HDS721010CLA332 1TB
111GB free, PID 0c25
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 7.1 7.7 7.1 7.1 7.1 7.2 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (10th percentile)
2.96% Terrible
Read 7.3
Write 9
Mixed 6.5
SusWrite 7.2
10% 7.5 MB/s
4K Read 0.1
4K Write 0.1
4K Mixed 0.1
7% 0.1 MB/s
Poor: 3%
This bench: 2.96%
Great: 19%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston MSI24D4S7S8MB-8 2x8GB
2 of 2 slots used
16GB SODIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2400 MHz
Performing below potential (23rd percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
67% Good
MC Read 25.8
MC Write 25.2
MC Mixed 20.5
68% 23.8 GB/s
SC Read 14.5
SC Write 23.6
SC Mixed 20.1
55% 19.4 GB/s
Latency 74.2
54% 74.2 ns
Poor: 57%
This bench: 67%
Great: 78%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical MS-16P1 Builds (Compare 434 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 10%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 60%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 10%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: MSI MS-16P1

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $160Nvidia RTX 4060 $290WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $120
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $388WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $79
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $363
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback