Asus P7P55D-E LX

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 65%
Destroyer
Desktop
Desktop 78%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 51%
Yacht
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (64th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 36 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 74.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics88.2% is a very good 3D score, it's the business. This GPU can handle recent 3D games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive67.1% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
MotherboardAsus P7P55D-E LX  (all builds)
Memory13.9 GB free of 16 GB @ 0.8 GHz
Display3840 x 2160 - 32 Bit farver
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20120927
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateOct 15 '18 at 09:14
Run Duration180 Seconds
Run User DNK-User
Background CPU0%
Watch Gameplay: 1070 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing above expectations (64th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7 860-$320
LGA1156, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.35 GHz, turbo 3.35 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (98th percentile)
74.7% Very good
Memory 93.9
1-Core 85.4
2-Core 166
70% 115 Pts
4-Core 302
8-Core 428
46% 365 Pts
64-Core 431
27% 431 Pts
Poor: 53%
This bench: 74.7%
Great: 72%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1070-$132
CLim: 1999 MHz, MLim: 2002 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 411.63
Performing way above expectations (97th percentile)
88.2% Excellent
Lighting 111
Reflection 117
Parallax 110
90% 113 fps
MRender 99.1
Gravity 104
Splatting 105
84% 103 fps
Poor: 71%
This bench: 88.2%
Great: 88%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 850 Evo 250GB-$100
149GB free (System drive)
Firmware: EMT02B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 182 177 199 201 203 201 MB/s
Performing below potential (4th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
67.1% Good
Read 243
Write 233
Mixed 213
SusWrite 194
50% 221 MB/s
4K Read 33.5
4K Write 61
4K Mixed 41.6
136% 45.4 MB/s
DQ Read 39.5
DQ Write 88
DQ Mixed 52.2
43% 59.9 MB/s
Poor: 72%
This bench: 67.1%
Great: 124%
Crucial C300-CTFDDAC128MAG 128GB
32GB free
Firmware: 0006
SusWrite @10s intervals: 113 106 117 117 118 129 MB/s
Performing below potential (1st percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
32% Below average
Read 240
Write 135
Mixed 158
SusWrite 116
36% 162 MB/s
4K Read 26.7
4K Write 4.9
4K Mixed 7.9
53% 13.2 MB/s
Poor: 41%
This bench: 32%
Great: 62%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.12 1TB-$70
467GB free
Firmware: JC4B
SusWrite @10s intervals: 116 120 121 121 121 121 MB/s
Performing above expectations (85th percentile)
64% Good
Read 103
Write 102
Mixed 59.4
SusWrite 120
70% 96.1 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 1.7
4K Mixed 1
176% 1.17 MB/s
Poor: 34%
This bench: 64%
Great: 68%
Maxtor 6E040T0 40GB
37GB free
Firmware: NAN51680
SusWrite @10s intervals: 59 58 58 60 59 59 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (94th percentile)
32.9% Below average
Read 55.7
Write 56.9
Mixed 33.3
SusWrite 58.7
38% 51.2 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 1.2
4K Mixed 0.6
110% 0.77 MB/s
Poor: 10%
This bench: 32.9%
Great: 33%
Iomega E xternal HD 500GB
64GB free, PID 0370
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 25 25 25 25 25 25 MB/s
Performing above expectations (64th percentile)
16.5% Very poor
Read 30.7
Write 26.2
Mixed 21.6
SusWrite 25.1
34% 25.9 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 2.1
4K Mixed 1.1
111% 1.3 MB/s
Poor: 10%
This bench: 16.5%
Great: 19%
WD Authorized HDD 1TB
801GB free, PID 2600
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 121 112 128 129 129 129 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
53.1% Above average
Read 118
Write 116
Mixed 71.9
SusWrite 125
145% 108 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 2.8
4K Mixed 1
132% 1.53 MB/s
Poor: 22%
This bench: 53.1%
Great: 53%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 16GB
800, 800 MHz
8192, 8192 MB
Performing below potential (32nd percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
35.5% Below average
MC Read 13.4
MC Write 10.5
MC Mixed 9.4
32% 11.1 GB/s
SC Read 11.2
SC Write 12.1
SC Mixed 11
33% 11.4 GB/s
Latency 60
67% 60 ns
Poor: 25%
This bench: 35.5%
Great: 54%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical P7P55D-E LX Builds (Compare 496 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 22%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 71%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 17%
Surfboard

Motherboard: Asus P7P55D-E LX

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 85% - Excellent Total price: $187
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $176Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $124Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback