PC Status | Overall this PC is performing below expectations (31st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 69 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas. |
Processor | With an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 57.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average. |
Graphics | 54.5% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics) |
Boot Drive | 32.6% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times. |
Memory | 24GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 24GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing. |
OS Version | Although Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 9 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager. |
Motherboard | Asus M5A78L-M PLUS/USB3 (all builds) |
Memory | 11.1 GB free of 24 GB @ 1.3 GHz |
Display | 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors |
OS | Windows 7 |
BIOS Date | 20160627 |
Uptime | 2.7 Days |
Run Date | Oct 13 '18 at 01:11 |
Run Duration | 178 Seconds |
Run User | USA-User |
Background CPU | 79% |
Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).
Processor | Bench | Normal | Heavy | Server |
---|---|---|---|---|
57.8%
Above average
|
||||
Graphics Card | Bench | 3D DX9 | 3D DX10 | 3D DX11 |
---|---|---|---|---|
Nvidia GTX 1060-6GB-$117
CLim: 1911 MHz, MLim: 2002 MHz, Ram: 6GB, Driver: 388.13
Performing below potential (31st percentile) - GPU OC Guide |
54.5%
Above average
|
|||
Drives | Bench | Sequential | Random 4k | Deep queue 4k |
---|---|---|---|---|
WD Blue 250GB-$90
8GB free (System drive)
Firmware: X41110WD
SusWrite @10s intervals: 50 34 31 36 37 MB/s
|
32.6%
Below average
|
|||
47.3%
Average
|
||||
Seagate ST3250620AS 250GB-$149
233GB free
Firmware: 3.AAJ
SusWrite @10s intervals: 78 79 79 77 79 79 MB/s
|
43.9%
Average
|
|||
BUFFALO HD-PCTU2 1TB
221GB free, PID 01c5
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 18 18 17 17 17 17 MB/s
|
8.69%
Terrible
|
|||
WD 1200BEV External 120GB
32GB free, PID 0702
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 17 18 17 17 17 17 MB/s
|
12.7%
Very poor
|
|||
Memory Kit | Bench | Multi core | Single core | Latency |
---|---|---|---|---|
Unknown 24GB
null MHz
8192, 8192, 4096, 4096 MB
|
41%
Average
|
|||
L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds
|
|
|
CPU | |
---|---|
FX-6300AMD $90Bench 55%, 261,607 samples | 434x |
FX-8350AMD $130Bench 61%, 313,196 samples | 294x |
FX-8300AMD $168Bench 58%, 49,767 samples | 176x |
GPU | |
---|---|
GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples | 177x |
Radeon RX 560-BAMDBench 20%, 49,289 samples | 86x |
GTX 1050Nvidia $101Bench 26%, 269,381 samples | 84x |
EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER | Value: 81% - Excellent | Total price: $177 |