Medionpc MS-7616

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 10%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 70%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 8%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (50th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 50 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 67%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics15.1% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive20.8% is an extremely low SSD score, this system will benefit from a faster SSD.
Memory6GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 6GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
SystemMedionpc MS-7616  (all builds)
MotherboardMEDIONPC MS-7616
Memory3.6 GB free of 6 GB @ 0 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colores
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20100518
Uptime0 Days
Run DateOct 10 '18 at 03:23
Run Duration168 Seconds
Run User ESP-User
Background CPU1%

 PC Performing as expected (50th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7 870-$100
CPU 1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 2.95 GHz, turbo 3.1 GHz (avg)
Performing as expected (54th percentile)
67% Good
Memory 89.3
1-Core 81.7
2-Core 157
66% 109 Pts
4-Core 245
8-Core 346
37% 296 Pts
64-Core 352
22% 352 Pts
Poor: 53%
This bench: 67%
Great: 74%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD HD 7770
Sapphire(174B E215) 1GB
CLim: 1100 MHz, MLim: 1300 MHz, Ram: 1GB, Driver: 17.7
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
15.1% Very poor
Lighting 18.7
Reflection 18.2
Parallax 23.7
15% 20.2 fps
MRender 14.7
Gravity 17.5
Splatting 20.8
15% 17.7 fps
Poor: 11%
This bench: 15.1%
Great: 14%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
SSD 240GB 240GB
111GB free (System drive)
Firmware: Q0616B0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 129 191 52 52 15 53 MB/s
Performing below potential (1st percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
20.8% Poor
Read 238
Write 216
Mixed 212
SusWrite 82
42% 187 MB/s
4K Read 13.7
4K Write 4.8
4K Mixed 0.3
24% 6.27 MB/s
Poor: 33%
This bench: 20.8%
Great: 90%
WD Green 3TB (2011)-$59
365GB free
Firmware: 80.00A80
SusWrite @10s intervals: 93 92 95 96 95 95 MB/s
Performing as expected (53rd percentile)
63.4% Good
Read 127
Write 123
Mixed 62.9
SusWrite 94.1
74% 102 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 2.5
4K Mixed 0.9
180% 1.4 MB/s
Poor: 40%
This bench: 63.4%
Great: 83%
WD WD5000AACS-00ZUB0 500GB
230GB free
Firmware: 01.01B01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 59 57 58 59 59 59 MB/s
Performing as expected (43rd percentile)
33.9% Below average
Read 59.2
Write 53.6
Mixed 37.9
SusWrite 58.5
38% 52.3 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 2
4K Mixed 0.7
136% 1.07 MB/s
Poor: 23%
This bench: 33.9%
Great: 49%
Generic Mass-Storage 129GB
119GB free, PID null
SusWrite @10s intervals: 2.4 6.1 7 3.9 5 6.6 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (9th percentile)
2.49% Terrible
Read 8.5
Write 0.2
Mixed 1.3
SusWrite 5.1
4% 3.78 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 0
4K Mixed 0
2% 0.2 MB/s
Poor: 2%
This bench: 2.49%
Great: 35%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 6GB
0, 0, 0, 0 MHz
1024, 2048, 1024, 2048 MB
Performing way above expectations (89th percentile)
39.4% Below average
MC Read 15.7
MC Write 12.6
MC Mixed 11.5
38% 13.3 GB/s
SC Read 11.3
SC Write 10.2
SC Mixed 10.8
31% 10.8 GB/s
Latency 68.2
59% 68.2 ns
Poor: 12%
This bench: 39.4%
Great: 46%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical MS-7616 Builds (Compare 223 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 22%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 72%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 17%
Surfboard

System: Medionpc MS-7616

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 87% - Excellent Total price: $187
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $164Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-13600K $239Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-12400F $109Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $397
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback