Gigabyte GA-X58A-UD7

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 16%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 86%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 14%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (48th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 52 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 83.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics33% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive48% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory4GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 4GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
MotherboardGigabyte GA-X58A-UD7  (all builds)
Memory1.7 GB free of 4 GB @ 0.4 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20110901
Uptime0 Days
Run DateOct 09 '18 at 22:26
Run Duration178 Seconds
Run User BGR-User
Background CPU10%

 PC Performing as expected (48th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7 X 980-$148
Socket 1366, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 3.35 GHz, turbo 3.7 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (93rd percentile)
83.2% Excellent
Memory 96.9
1-Core 94.4
2-Core 187
75% 126 Pts
4-Core 375
8-Core 600
60% 487 Pts
64-Core 698
43% 698 Pts
Poor: 67%
This bench: 83.2%
Great: 85%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 960-$198
CLim: 1493 MHz, MLim: 1800 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 416.16
Performing below potential (65th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
33% Below average
Lighting 43.1
Reflection 42.7
Parallax 38.2
35% 41.3 fps
MRender 31.2
Gravity 38.6
Splatting 35.3
29% 35.1 fps
Poor: 30%
This bench: 33%
Great: 36%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
SiImage 240GB
56GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 0000
SusWrite @10s intervals: 96 87 77 83 82 82 MB/s
Performing below potential (8th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
48% Average
Read 171
Write 182
Mixed 166
SusWrite 84.6
34% 151 MB/s
4K Read 19
4K Write 57.8
4K Mixed 21.6
87% 32.8 MB/s
DQ Read 257
DQ Write 171
DQ Mixed 163
135% 197 MB/s
Poor: 44%
This bench: 48%
Great: 84%
Samsung 970 Pro NVMe PCIe M.2 1TB-$320
609GB free
Firmware: 1B2QEXP7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1159 1136 1166 1075 1078 1081 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (4th percentile)
203% Outstanding
Read 1,228
Write 1,062
Mixed 1,012
SusWrite 1,116
249% 1,105 MB/s
4K Read 35.9
4K Write 100
4K Mixed 62.9
188% 66.3 MB/s
DQ Read 692
DQ Write 495
DQ Mixed 652
471% 613 MB/s
Poor: 215%
This bench: 203%
Great: 425%
WD Black 1TB (2010)-$58
135GB free
Firmware: 05.01D05
SusWrite @10s intervals: 79 79 81 79 80 79 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (17th percentile)
44.7% Average
Read 76
Write 68.8
Mixed 61.5
SusWrite 79.5
53% 71.4 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 1.7
4K Mixed 0.9
165% 1.13 MB/s
Poor: 35%
This bench: 44.7%
Great: 76%
Kingston DataTraveler 100 G3 USB 3.0 8GB-$7
5GB free, PID 1666
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 9 9 9.1 9.1 9.1 9.1 MB/s
Performing as expected (50th percentile)
9.63% Terrible
Read 32.7
Write 9
Mixed 7.8
SusWrite 9
16% 14.6 MB/s
4K Read 4.6
4K Write 0.6
4K Mixed 0
38% 1.73 MB/s
Poor: 5%
This bench: 9.63%
Great: 22%
Flash Disk 4GB
4GB free, PID 3234
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 3.8 3.9 4 4 4 3.9 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
4.71% Terrible
Read 17.5
Write 2.5
Mixed 4.3
SusWrite 3.9
7% 7.05 MB/s
4K Read 5.6
4K Write 0
4K Mixed 0
21% 1.87 MB/s
Poor: 4%
This bench: 4.71%
Great: 5%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 2x2GB
2 of 6 slots used
4GB DIMM
Performing way above expectations (97th percentile)
46.4% Average
MC Read 18.3
MC Write 14.8
MC Mixed 13.1
44% 15.4 GB/s
SC Read 13.5
SC Write 10.9
SC Mixed 12.2
35% 12.2 GB/s
Latency 50.5
79% 50.5 ns
Poor: 10%
This bench: 46.4%
Great: 44%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical GA-X58A-UD7 Builds (Compare 419 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 35%
Jet ski
Desktop
Desktop 73%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 28%
Raft

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-X58A-UD7

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 59% - Above average Total price: $388
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $160Nvidia RTX 4060 $290WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $160
Intel Core i5-13600K $249Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $79
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $363
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback