Asus P5KC

Performance Results


Gaming 12% Tree trunk	Desktop 63% Destroyer	Workstation 9% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (28th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 72 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 61.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics	14.9% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Memory	8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 9 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.

Run History

5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago.

Motherboard	Asus P5KC (all builds)
Memory	4.1 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.1 GHz
Display	1680 x 1050 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 7
BIOS Date	20080625
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Oct 09 '18 at 15:24
Run Duration	203 Seconds
Run User	GRC-User
Background CPU	1%

PC Performing below expectations (28^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core2 Extreme X9770 522 User benchmarks, average bench 57% LGA775, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads Base clock 3.4 GHz Performing way above expectations (86^th percentile)	61.6% Good	Memory 87.8 1-Core 52.1 2-Core 105 53% 81.6 Pts	4-Core 208 8-Core 205 28% 206 Pts	64-Core 206 13% 206 Pts
Poor: 48% ↑ This bench: 61.6% Great: 65%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
AMD HD 7870-$203 42,130 User benchmarks, average bench 26% Sapphire(174B E224) 2GB CLim: 1000 MHz, MLim: 1200 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 17.7.1 Performing below potential (0^th percentile) - GPU OC Guide	14.9% Very poor	Lighting 10.8 Reflection 15.7 Parallax 13.1 9% 13.2 fps	MRender 28.2 Gravity 29.9 Splatting 37.3 27% 31.8 fps
Poor: 24% ↑ This bench: 14.9% Great: 28%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Kingston SSDNow V+ Series 128GB 720 User benchmarks, average bench 34% 2GB free (System drive) Firmware: AGYA0201 Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete		Read 139 Write 48.8 Mixed 88 20% 92 MB/s	4K Read 17.4 4K Write 9.9 4K Mixed 10.7 45% 12.7 MB/s	DQ Read 11.2 DQ Write 10.2 DQ Mixed 9.6 8% 10.3 MB/s
Poor: 19% Great: 44%
WD Green 240GB (2018)-$51 156,194 User benchmarks, average bench 45% 204GB free Firmware: UF450000 SusWrite @10s intervals: 172 171 99 107 97 142 MB/s Performing below potential (19^th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable	38.8% Below average	Read 232 Write 202 Mixed 135 SusWrite 131 39% 175 MB/s	4K Read 18.6 4K Write 23.6 4K Mixed 19.6 66% 20.6 MB/s	DQ Read 19.4 DQ Write 22.8 DQ Mixed 20.6 16% 20.9 MB/s
Poor: 34% ↑ This bench: 38.8% Great: 55%
Samsung Spinpoint T166 500GB-$40 43,024 User benchmarks, average bench 34% 9GB free Firmware: CR100-12 SusWrite @10s intervals: 65 49 19 15 9.4 9.8 MB/s Performing below expectations (24^th percentile)	27.6% Poor	Read 68.3 Write 75.3 Mixed 47.5 SusWrite 27.6 40% 54.7 MB/s	4K Read 0.5 4K Write 1.4 4K Mixed 0.7 124% 0.87 MB/s
Poor: 22% ↑ This bench: 27.6% Great: 44%
Seagate ST3250310AS 250GB-$44 34,705 User benchmarks, average bench 42% 2GB free Firmware: 4.CCB Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete		Read 96.5 Write 58.5 Mixed 46.5 50% 67.2 MB/s	4K Read 0.7 4K Write 1.4 4K Mixed 0.9 155% 1 MB/s
Poor: 20% Great: 54%
MD07500- AQDW-RO 750GB 8 User benchmarks, average bench 15% 7GB free, PID 0c31 Operating at USB 2.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 18 19 19 20 20 20 MB/s Performing way below expectations (13^th percentile)	9.42% Terrible	Read 3.3 Write 24 Mixed 20.3 SusWrite 19.2 26% 16.7 MB/s	4K Read 0.6 4K Write 1.5 4K Mixed 0.6 74% 0.9 MB/s
Poor: 9% ↑ This bench: 9.42% Great: 21%
WDC WD50 00AAKS-00A7B0 500GB 8 User benchmarks, average bench 17% 8GB free, PID 55aa Operating at USB 2.1 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 2.2 2.3 2.8 2 2.3 2.2 MB/s Performing as expected (43^rd percentile)	12.8% Very poor	Read 33 Write 25.5 Mixed 25 SusWrite 2.3 27% 21.5 MB/s	4K Read 0.7 4K Write 2.4 4K Mixed 0.9 115% 1.33 MB/s
Poor: 12% ↑ This bench: 12.8% Great: 30%
WDC WD50 00AAKX-60U6AA0 500GB 11 User benchmarks, average bench 26% 5GB free, PID 55aa Operating at USB 2.1 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 17 17 17 18 17 17 MB/s Performing way below expectations (9^th percentile)	12.5% Very poor	Read 32 Write 24.5 Mixed 24.5 SusWrite 17.3 32% 24.6 MB/s	4K Read 0.6 4K Write 1.3 4K Mixed 0.7 70% 0.87 MB/s
Poor: 14% ↑ This bench: 12.5% Great: 48%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown 2x4GB 424,126 User benchmarks, average bench 39% 2 of 4 slots used 8GB DIMM DDR2 Performing below potential (34^th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP	27.7% Poor	MC Read 9.4 MC Write 8.5 MC Mixed 8 25% 8.63 GB/s	SC Read 8 SC Write 8.8 SC Mixed 8.3 24% 8.37 GB/s	Latency 69.7 57% 69.7 ns
Poor: 17% ↑ This bench: 27.7% Great: 65%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical P5KC Builds (Compare 260 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 2%

Tree trunk

Desktop 38%

Jet ski

Workstation 2%

Tree trunk

Motherboard: Asus P5KC

CPU
Core2 Quad Q6600Intel $100Bench 42%, 59,658 samples	42x
Xeon X5460Intel $190Bench 52%, 10,360 samples	23x
Core2 Duo E8400Intel $89Bench 40%, 68,540 samples	20x

GPU
GeForce 210NvidiaBench 1%, 98,254 samples	12x
GTX 560 TiNvidia $188Bench 16%, 42,397 samples	8x
GTX 760Nvidia $209Bench 26%, 161,132 samples	8x

SSD
BX500 240GBCrucial $28Bench 56%, 142,801 samples	11x
A400 240GBKingston $28Bench 66%, 424,288 samples	7x
SSDNOW 30GBKingstonBench 19%, 495 samples	5x

RAM
2x2GBUnknownBench 20%, 446,702 samples	60x
4x2GBUnknownBench 25%, 183,252 samples	59x
2x4GBUnknownBench 39%, 424,126 samples	52x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 47% - Average

Total price: $128

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273	Nvidia RTX 4060 $280	Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $128	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $160	Nvidia RTX 4070 $515	Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $29

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $39	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $32	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16