Asus TUF Z370-PRO GAMING

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 49%
Yacht
Desktop
Desktop 82%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 42%
Speed boat
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (52nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 48 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 74.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics58.8% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive85.4% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
5 years ago, 5 years ago.
MotherboardAsus TUF Z370-PRO GAMING  (all builds)
Memory13.7 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colores, 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colores
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20170905
Uptime0 Days
Run DateOct 08 '18 at 21:35
Run Duration252 Seconds
Run User MEX-User
Background CPU4%
Watch Gameplay: 1060-3GB + 9400F How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing as expected (52nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-8400-$131
LGA1151, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 6 threads
Base clock 2.8 GHz, turbo 2.8 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (13th percentile)
74.8% Very good
Memory 87
1-Core 114
2-Core 175
75% 125 Pts
4-Core 338
8-Core 545
54% 442 Pts
64-Core 541
34% 541 Pts
Poor: 61%
This bench: 74.8%
Great: 89%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1060-3GB-$119
Asus(1043 85B9) 3GB
CLim: 1974 MHz, MLim: 2002 MHz, Ram: 3GB, Driver: 398.36
Performing below potential (100th percentile) - Disable monitor sync before benchmarking (72 fps cap detected)
58.8% Above average
Lighting 72.4
Reflection 71
Parallax 61.9
59% 68.5 fps
MRender 71.9
Gravity 69
Splatting 72.2
58% 71 fps
Poor: 48%
This bench: 58.8%
Great: 56%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
WD Blue 3D SATA M.2 500GB-$95
316GB free (System drive)
Firmware: X61190WD
SusWrite @10s intervals: 355 379 392 398 400 390 MB/s
Performing below expectations (23rd percentile)
85.4% Excellent
Read 464
Write 408
Mixed 257
SusWrite 386
85% 379 MB/s
4K Read 33.9
4K Write 61.1
4K Mixed 32.3
125% 42.4 MB/s
DQ Read 161
DQ Write 64.9
DQ Mixed 89.9
73% 105 MB/s
Poor: 72%
This bench: 85.4%
Great: 116%
Sandisk PLUS 480 GB 480GB
359GB free
Firmware: UG4500RL
SusWrite @10s intervals: 221 2.9 218 134 203 184 MB/s
Performing as expected (59th percentile)
47.2% Average
Read 419
Write 321
Mixed 251
SusWrite 160
64% 288 MB/s
4K Read 19.1
4K Write 34.2
4K Mixed 7.3
56% 20.2 MB/s
DQ Read 117
DQ Write 88.7
DQ Mixed 41.9
48% 82.5 MB/s
Poor: 29%
This bench: 47.2%
Great: 57%
ADATA USB Flash Drive 32GB
23GB free, PID c08a
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 2.1 5.9 3.5 5.4 8.5 8.7 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (14th percentile)
2.64% Terrible
Read 7.7
Write 1
Mixed 4.2
SusWrite 5.7
6% 4.65 MB/s
4K Read 1.2
4K Write 0
4K Mixed 0
4% 0.4 MB/s
Poor: 3%
This bench: 2.64%
Great: 11%
SanDisk Cruzer Blade 8GB
3GB free, PID 5567
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 5.2 4.4 3.9 3.9 4.1 3.8 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (85th percentile)
11.8% Very poor
Read 36.7
Write 8
Mixed 7.7
SusWrite 4.2
14% 14.2 MB/s
4K Read 4.1
4K Write 1.5
4K Mixed 2.5
151% 2.7 MB/s
Poor: 6%
This bench: 11.8%
Great: 13%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 2400 C16 2x8GB
2 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2400 MHz
Performing above expectations (73rd percentile)
80.2% Excellent
MC Read 30.9
MC Write 31.3
MC Mixed 24
82% 28.7 GB/s
SC Read 17.1
SC Write 29.8
SC Mixed 23.5
67% 23.5 GB/s
Latency 70.5
57% 70.5 ns
Poor: 47%
This bench: 80.2%
Great: 89%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical TUF Z370-PRO GAMING Builds (Compare 1,622 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 93%
Nuclear submarine
Desktop
Desktop 91%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 85%
Aircraft carrier

Motherboard: Asus TUF Z370-PRO GAMING

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 73% - Very good Total price: $709
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $269Nvidia RTX 4060 $295Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $177Nvidia RTX 4070 $539Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback