Asus P6T

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming 7% Tree trunk	Desktop 65% Destroyer	Workstation 6% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (50th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 50 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 70%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics	10.9% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Memory	6GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 6GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 9 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.

Run History

5 years ago, 5 years ago.

Motherboard	Asus P6T (all builds)
Memory	3.7 GB free of 6 GB @ 1.1 GHz
Display	1360 x 768 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 7
BIOS Date	20090818
Uptime	1.4 Days
Run Date	Oct 06 '18 at 14:24
Run Duration	228 Seconds
Run User	USA-User
Background CPU	1%

PC Performing as expected (50^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i7-920-$90 69,074 User benchmarks, average bench 62% LGA1366, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads Base clock 2.65 GHz Performing way above expectations (93^rd percentile)	70% Very good	Memory 93.4 1-Core 70.9 2-Core 142 63% 102 Pts	4-Core 255 8-Core 356 38% 306 Pts	64-Core 356 22% 356 Pts
Poor: 46% ↑ This bench: 70% Great: 72%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GeForce GTX 285 2,842 User benchmarks, average bench 9% BFG(19F1 1040) 1GB Ram: 1GB, Driver: 342.1 Performing way above expectations (100^th percentile)	10.9% Very poor	Lighting 15 Reflection 10.7 Parallax 6.81 12% 10.8 fps	MRender 10.8 Gravity 12.1 Splatting 7.96 8% 10.3 fps
Poor: 8% ↑ This bench: 10.9% Great: 10%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung 840 Pro 128GB-$150 34,842 User benchmarks, average bench 90% 41GB free (System drive) Firmware: DXM06B0Q Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete		Read 4,247 Write 4,329 Mixed 4,151 949% 4,242 MB/s	4K Read 518 4K Write 398 4K Mixed 418 1,532% 445 MB/s	DQ Read 989 DQ Write 836 DQ Mixed 894 675% 906 MB/s
Poor: 62% Great: 110%
Toshiba MQ01ABD050 500GB-$23 40,922 User benchmarks, average bench 46% 125GB free Firmware: AX001A SusWrite @10s intervals: 93 102 103 104 103 103 MB/s Performing as expected (54^th percentile)	47.7% Average	Read 65 Write 63.3 Mixed 28.3 SusWrite 101 47% 64.4 MB/s	4K Read 0.5 4K Write 1.6 4K Mixed 0.6 117% 0.9 MB/s
Poor: 23% ↑ This bench: 47.7% Great: 62%
WD Blue 1TB (2012)-$37 3,105,054 User benchmarks, average bench 83% 622GB free Firmware: 01.01A01 SusWrite @10s intervals: 123 139 138 139 139 138 MB/s Performing below expectations (40^th percentile)	79.2% Very good	Read 140 Write 136 Mixed 78.5 SusWrite 136 90% 123 MB/s	4K Read 1.3 4K Write 2.8 4K Mixed 1.1 228% 1.73 MB/s
Poor: 52% ↑ This bench: 79.2% Great: 109%
ASMT 2115 1TB 378 User benchmarks, average bench 49% 912GB free, PID 55aa Operating at USB 2.1 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 9 9.1 9.1 9.1 9 9.1 MB/s Performing way below expectations (13^th percentile)	11.8% Very poor	Read 29 Write 27 Mixed 23.3 SusWrite 9.1 29% 22.1 MB/s	4K Read 0.5 4K Write 1.8 4K Mixed 0.6 84% 0.97 MB/s
Poor: 10% ↑ This bench: 11.8% Great: 189%
PNY USB 2.0 FD 4GB 62 User benchmarks, average bench 6% 1GB free, PID 0062 Operating at USB 2.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 5.6 6.6 6.5 6.5 6.5 6.8 MB/s Performing above expectations (73^rd percentile)	6.43% Terrible	Read 24.3 Write 8.2 Mixed 8 SusWrite 6.4 13% 11.7 MB/s	4K Read 6.4 4K Write 0 4K Mixed 0 24% 2.13 MB/s
Poor: 5% ↑ This bench: 6.43% Great: 7%
WDC WD32 00BEVT-22ZCT0 320GB 17 User benchmarks, average bench 16% 248GB free, PID ce15 Operating at USB 2.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 8.4 9 9.1 9.2 9 9.3 MB/s Performing way below expectations (18^th percentile)	11.9% Very poor	Read 27.8 Write 27 Mixed 21.5 SusWrite 9 28% 21.3 MB/s	4K Read 0.5 4K Write 1.9 4K Mixed 0.7 90% 1.03 MB/s
Poor: 12% ↑ This bench: 11.9% Great: 20%
TOSHIBA External USB 3.0 1TB 1,310 User benchmarks, average bench 29% 215GB free, PID 0202 Operating at USB 2.1 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 9.1 9.2 9.1 9.2 9 9.1 MB/s Performing way below expectations (5^th percentile)	11.2% Very poor	Read 28.8 Write 27.5 Mixed 19.5 SusWrite 9.1 27% 21.2 MB/s	4K Read 0.5 4K Write 1.6 4K Mixed 0.6 77% 0.9 MB/s
Poor: 13% ↑ This bench: 11.2% Great: 45%
PNY USB 3.0 FD 32GB 586 User benchmarks, average bench 19% 20GB free, PID 00ad Operating at USB 2.1 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 7.7 6 6.1 5.9 6.5 6.6 MB/s Performing way below expectations (18^th percentile)	9.66% Terrible	Read 29 Write 3.3 Mixed 2.5 SusWrite 6.4 10% 10.3 MB/s	4K Read 4.2 4K Write 1 4K Mixed 1.5 101% 2.23 MB/s
Poor: 9% ↑ This bench: 9.66% Great: 27%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown 3x2GB 45,030 User benchmarks, average bench 30% 3 of 6 slots used 6GB DIMM Performing way above expectations (88^th percentile)	44.5% Average	MC Read 17.2 MC Write 12.2 MC Mixed 16.9 44% 15.4 GB/s	SC Read 10.3 SC Write 9 SC Mixed 11.3 29% 10.2 GB/s	Latency 61.1 66% 61.1 ns
Poor: 13% ↑ This bench: 44.5% Great: 52%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical P6T Builds (Compare 1,169 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 33%

Sail boat

Desktop 69%

Battle cruiser

Workstation 26%

Raft

Motherboard: Asus P6T

CPU
Core i7-920Intel $90Bench 62%, 69,074 samples	570x
Core i7 930Intel $199Bench 64%, 19,497 samples	145x
Core i7-950Intel $100Bench 66%, 36,389 samples	72x

GPU
GTX 970Nvidia $200Bench 49%, 834,238 samples	78x
GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples	64x
GTX 960Nvidia $198Bench 33%, 440,282 samples	51x

SSD
A400 240GBKingston $28Bench 66%, 424,288 samples	36x
850 Evo 250GBSamsung $100Bench 103%, 951,591 samples	35x
A400 480GBKingston $38Bench 74%, 237,487 samples	34x

RAM
6x2GBUnknownBench 46%, 38,297 samples	224x
6x4GBUnknownBench 47%, 28,320 samples	124x
3x2GBUnknownBench 30%, 45,030 samples	103x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 62% - Good

Total price: $318

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $274	Nvidia RTX 4060 $295	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $177	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16