Dell Precision T1600

Performance Results


Gaming 7% Tree trunk	Desktop 66% Battle cruiser	Workstation 7% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (29th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 71 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 73.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics	3.11% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	54.8% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 9 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.

Sub-optimal background CPU (13%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

Run History

5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago.

System	Dell Precision T1600
Motherboard	Dell Precision T1600 (all builds)
Memory	6.2 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 7
BIOS Date	20110411
Uptime	0.3 Days
Run Date	Oct 05 '18 at 17:46
Run Duration	130 Seconds
Run User	SRB-User
Background CPU	13%

PC Performing below expectations (29^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Xeon E3-1245 3,302 User benchmarks, average bench 70% CPU 1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads Base clock 3.3 GHz Performing above expectations (76^th percentile)	73.3% Very good	Memory 89.1 1-Core 91.2 2-Core 181 71% 120 Pts	4-Core 312 8-Core 453 48% 382 Pts	64-Core 449 28% 449 Pts
Poor: 61% ↑ This bench: 73.3% Great: 77%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia Quadro FX 1800 6,394 User benchmarks, average bench 4% Nvidia(10DE 062C) 768MB Ram: 768MB, Driver: 342.0 Performing way below expectations (18^th percentile)	3.11% Terrible	Lighting 4.17 Reflection 4.54 Parallax 1.66 3% 3.45 fps	MRender 3.14 Gravity 3.47 Splatting 2.83 3% 3.15 fps
Poor: 3% ↑ This bench: 3.11% Great: 4%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
AMD Radeon R3 240GB 4,257 User benchmarks, average bench 77% 171GB free (System drive) Firmware: P042 SusWrite @10s intervals: 214 113 75 70 68 73 MB/s Performing below potential (7^th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable	54.8% Above average	Read 238 Write 236 Mixed 238 SusWrite 102 46% 204 MB/s	4K Read 23.3 4K Write 48.6 4K Mixed 29.9 99% 33.9 MB/s	DQ Read 174 DQ Write 187 DQ Mixed 174 133% 178 MB/s
Poor: 53% ↑ This bench: 54.8% Great: 90%
WD Elements 25A1 1.5TB 818 User benchmarks, average bench 31% 113GB free, PID 25a1 Operating at USB 2.1 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 26 27 27 26 27 27 MB/s Performing way below expectations (15^th percentile)	15.7% Very poor	Read 31.5 Write 25.5 Mixed 23.8 SusWrite 26.4 36% 26.8 MB/s	4K Read 0.5 4K Write 1.7 4K Mixed 0.8 87% 1 MB/s
Poor: 14% ↑ This bench: 15.7% Great: 47%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Kingston 9905474-062.A00LF 9905474-062.A00LF 9905474-062.A00LF 99U5471-012.A00LF 16GB 2 User benchmarks, average bench 47% 1333, 1333, 1333, 1333 MHz 4096, 4096, 4096, 4096 MB Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples	46.6% Average	MC Read 16 MC Write 16.4 MC Mixed 14.7 45% 15.7 GB/s	SC Read 12.9 SC Write 15.7 SC Mixed 14.4 41% 14.3 GB/s	Latency 68.4 58% 68.4 ns
Poor: 47% ↑ This bench: 46.6% Great: 48%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical Precision T1600 Builds (Compare 564 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 9%

Tree trunk

Desktop 65%

Destroyer

Workstation 8%

Tree trunk

Motherboard: Dell Precision T1600

CPU
Xeon E31225IntelBench 69%, 3,353 samples	194x
Xeon E3-1245IntelBench 70%, 3,302 samples	160x
Xeon E31270IntelBench 71%, 3,539 samples	96x

GPU
Quadro 2000NvidiaBench 6%, 15,855 samples	51x
Quadro 600NvidiaBench 3%, 15,964 samples	46x
GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples	41x

SSD
A400 240GBKingston $28Bench 66%, 424,288 samples	22x
850 Evo 250GBSamsung $100Bench 103%, 951,591 samples	10x
SSDNow V300 120GBKingston $38Bench 54%, 339,020 samples	9x

RAM
M378B5273DH0-CH9 2x4GBSamsungBench 48%, 11,003 samples	9x
M378B5273DH0-CH9 4x4GBSamsungBench 49%, 2,942 samples	9x
M378B5273CH0-CH9 4x4GBSamsungBench 49%, 1,553 samples	7x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 22% - Poor

Total price: $28

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $254	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $163	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $79	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16