Lenovo 429053G

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 6%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 56%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 5%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (40th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 60 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 57.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics2.14% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive36.2% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
SystemLenovo 429053G  (all builds)
MotherboardLENOVO 429053G
Memory7.7 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20180621
Uptime2.7 Days
Run DateOct 05 '18 at 08:35
Run Duration114 Seconds
Run User UKR-User
Background CPU8%

 PC Performing as expected (40th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-2640M
CPU, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2.8 GHz, turbo 3.3 GHz (avg)
Performing as expected (58th percentile)
57.4% Above average
Memory 78.5
1-Core 87.4
2-Core 148
63% 105 Pts
4-Core 212
8-Core 209
28% 211 Pts
64-Core 206
13% 206 Pts
Poor: 28%
This bench: 57.4%
Great: 63%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel HD 3000 (Mobile V2 1.3 GHz)
Legend(17AA 21DA) 2GB
Driver: igdumd64.dll Ver. 9.17.10.4459
Performing as expected (56th percentile)
2.14% Terrible
Lighting 2.37
Reflection 3.38
Parallax 1.56
2% 2.44 fps
MRender 3.14
Gravity 1.3
Splatting 4.43
3% 2.96 fps
Poor: 1%
This bench: 2.14%
Great: 2%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Kingston SSDNow V+200 240GB-$193
52GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 501ABBF0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 85 86 75 87 81 65 MB/s
Relative performance (0th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
36.2% Below average
Read 82.5
Write 160
Mixed 143
SusWrite 79.8
26% 116 MB/s
4K Read 14
4K Write 34.7
4K Mixed 19.3
64% 22.7 MB/s
DQ Read 186
DQ Write 172
DQ Mixed 144
118% 168 MB/s
Poor: 53%
This bench: 36.2%
Great: 91%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Transcend TS1GSK64V6H 2x8GB
2 of 2 slots used
16GB SODIMM DDR3 1333 MHz
Performing below potential (7th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
44.4% Average
MC Read 15.5
MC Write 15.9
MC Mixed 14.3
44% 15.2 GB/s
SC Read 12
SC Write 15.1
SC Mixed 13.7
39% 13.6 GB/s
Latency 83.4
48% 83.4 ns
Poor: 44%
This bench: 44.4%
Great: 57%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $254Nvidia RTX 4060 $300Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $163Nvidia RTX 4070 $539Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $31Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $37SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback