Hp-pavilion AY661AA-ACJ s5360in

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming 2% Tree trunk	Desktop 46% Yacht	Workstation 2% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (31st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 69 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 48.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Graphics	3.74% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	The boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory	8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 9 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.

Very high background CPU (54%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

Run History

5 years ago, 5 years ago.

System	Hp-pavilion AY661AA-ACJ s5360in (all builds)
Motherboard	MSI IONA
Memory	5.7 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 7
BIOS Date	20100128
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Oct 04 '18 at 11:51
Run Duration	167 Seconds
Run User	MUS-User
Background CPU	54%

PC Performing below expectations (31^st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i3 530-$45 16,724 User benchmarks, average bench 46% CPU 1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads Base clock 2.95 GHz Performing above expectations (79^th percentile)	48.8% Average	Memory 69.4 1-Core 66.7 2-Core 120 52% 85.5 Pts	4-Core 164 8-Core 170 22% 167 Pts	64-Core 181 11% 181 Pts
Poor: 33% ↑ This bench: 48.8% Great: 51%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GeForce GT 710 187,161 User benchmarks, average bench 3% Zotac(19DA 7326) 2GB CLim: 954 MHz, MLim: 400 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 411.70 Performing above expectations (75^th percentile)	3.74% Terrible	Lighting 4.4 Reflection 4.31 Parallax 4.28 4% 4.33 fps	MRender 4.14 Gravity 3.9 Splatting 6.17 4% 4.74 fps
Poor: 3% ↑ This bench: 3.74% Great: 4%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016)-$62 462,780 User benchmarks, average bench 92% 132GB free (System drive) Firmware: CC26 SusWrite @10s intervals: 152 60 58 35 31 31 MB/s Performing way below expectations (19^th percentile)	75% Very good	Read 200 Write 22 Mixed 19.7 SusWrite 61.1 55% 75.8 MB/s	4K Read 0.8 4K Write 1.7 4K Mixed 0.3 98% 0.93 MB/s
Poor: 63% ↑ This bench: 75% Great: 114%
Seagate Expansion 2TB 1,450 User benchmarks, average bench 32% 34GB free, PID 231a Operating at USB 2.1 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 17 14 14 12 12 12 MB/s Performing way below expectations (11^th percentile)	12.7% Very poor	Read 23.9 Write 27.5 Mixed 28.3 SusWrite 13.4 32% 23.3 MB/s	4K Read 0.6 4K Write 2 4K Mixed 0.9 101% 1.17 MB/s
Poor: 11% ↑ This bench: 12.7% Great: 49%
TOSHIBA External USB 3.0 2TB 3,591 User benchmarks, average bench 36% 391GB free, PID b207 Operating at USB 2.1 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 17 14 14 12 12 12 MB/s Performing below expectations (22^nd percentile)	24.6% Poor	Read 32.2 Write 26.2 Mixed 16.7 SusWrite 13.4 28% 22.1 MB/s	4K Read 0.5 4K Write 5.5 4K Mixed 0.3 199% 2.1 MB/s
Poor: 16% ↑ This bench: 24.6% Great: 51%
Seagate BUP Slim RG 2TB 21 User benchmarks, average bench 28% 25GB free, PID ab24 Operating at USB 2.1 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 17 14 14 12 12 12 MB/s Performing way below expectations (7^th percentile)	13% Very poor	Read 26.4 Write 26.9 Mixed 21.5 SusWrite 13.5 29% 22.1 MB/s	4K Read 0.3 4K Write 2 4K Mixed 1 103% 1.1 MB/s
Poor: 13% ↑ This bench: 13% Great: 47%
Seagate BUP Slim SL 2TB 642 User benchmarks, average bench 34% 31GB free, PID ab24 Operating at USB 2.1 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 17 14 14 12 12 12 MB/s Performing way below expectations (5^th percentile)	11.7% Very poor	Read 25.2 Write 25.9 Mixed 11.9 SusWrite 13.4 25% 19.1 MB/s	4K Read 0.8 4K Write 1.6 4K Mixed 0.3 68% 0.9 MB/s
Poor: 13% ↑ This bench: 11.7% Great: 53%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
CE80CE80 M378B5673EH1-CH9 V01L3LF4GB26826816 M378B5673EH1-CH9 8GB 1333, 1333, 1333 MHz 2048, 4096, 2048 MB Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples	28.3% Poor	MC Read 9.6 MC Write 8.5 MC Mixed 11.2 28% 9.77 GB/s	SC Read 7.7 SC Write 6.2 SC Mixed 7.5 20% 7.13 GB/s	Latency 103 39% 103 ns

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273	Nvidia RTX 4060 $289	Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $168	Nvidia RTX 4070 $550	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $39	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $32	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16