Asus P6X58D-E

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 22%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 69%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 19%
Surfboard
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (41st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 59 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 68.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics34.3% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 10 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.
Very high background CPU (73%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
MotherboardAsus P6X58D-E  (all builds)
Memory5.4 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1360 x 768 - 32 Bit couleurs
OSWindows 7
BIOS Date20120806
Uptime0 Days
Run DateOct 03 '18 at 19:20
Run Duration118 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU 73%

 PC Performing as expected (41st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Xeon W3690-$990
LGA1366, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 3.45 GHz
Performing way below expectations (7th percentile)
68.3% Good
Memory 91.5
1-Core 66.9
2-Core 143
62% 101 Pts
4-Core 245
8-Core 403
40% 324 Pts
64-Core 614
38% 614 Pts
Poor: 69%
This bench: 68.3%
Great: 86%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 960-$198
CLim: 1455 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 399.7
Performing above expectations (81st percentile)
34.3% Below average
Lighting 43.2
Reflection 38.5
Parallax 34.9
35% 38.9 fps
MRender 40
Gravity 42
Splatting 37.6
32% 39.9 fps
Poor: 30%
This bench: 34.3%
Great: 36%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Seagate ST500LM030-1RK17D 500GB
185GB free (System drive)
Firmware: SDM1
SusWrite @10s intervals: 55 66 67 61 62 67 MB/s
Performing below expectations (23rd percentile)
28.4% Poor
Read 35.4
Write 72.8
Mixed 36.7
SusWrite 63
38% 52 MB/s
4K Read 0.4
4K Write 1.8
4K Mixed 0.1
61% 0.77 MB/s
Poor: 11%
This bench: 28.4%
Great: 67%
ZALMAN External HDD 320GB
115GB free, PID 2028
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 22 22 23 23 22 23 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (11th percentile)
11.4% Very poor
Read 23
Write 7
Mixed 17.4
SusWrite 22.3
23% 17.4 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 1
4K Mixed 0.5
53% 0.67 MB/s
Poor: 11%
This bench: 11.4%
Great: 40%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 4x2GB
4 of 6 slots used
8GB DIMM
Performing above expectations (85th percentile)
34% Below average
MC Read 11.1
MC Write 13.3
MC Mixed 10.9
34% 11.8 GB/s
SC Read 6.1
SC Write 4.3
SC Mixed 7.5
17% 5.97 GB/s
Latency 64.9
62% 64.9 ns
Poor: 14%
This bench: 34%
Great: 45%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical P6X58D-E Builds (Compare 1,358 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 35%
Jet ski
Desktop
Desktop 73%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 28%
Raft

Motherboard: Asus P6X58D-E

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 57% - Above average Total price: $437
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $164Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-13600K $229Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-12400F $109Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $397
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback