PC Status | Overall this PC is performing way below expectations (16th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 84 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas. |
Processor | With a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 36.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is poor. |
Graphics | 1.27% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics) |
Boot Drive | 43.8% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications. |
Memory | 8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system. |
OS Version | Although Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 9 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager. |
System | Samsung RV411/RV511/E3511/S3511/RV711/E3411 (all builds) |
Motherboard | SAMSUNG RV411/RV511/E3511/S3511/RV711/E3411 |
Memory | 5.1 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.3 GHz |
Display | 1366 x 768 - 32 Bit colors |
OS | Windows 7 |
BIOS Date | 20121127 |
Uptime | 0.2 Days |
Run Date | Oct 03 '18 at 09:49 |
Run Duration | 150 Seconds |
Run User | KOR-User |
Background CPU | 50% |
Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).
Processor | Bench | Normal | Heavy | Server |
---|---|---|---|---|
Intel Core i5 M 480
CPU 1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2.65 GHz
|
36.6%
Below average
|
|||
Graphics Card | Bench | 3D DX9 | 3D DX10 | 3D DX11 |
---|---|---|---|---|
Nvidia GeForce 315M
Sanyo(144D C581) 512MB
Ram: 512MB, Driver: 267.54
|
1.27%
Terrible
|
|||
Drives | Bench | Sequential | Random 4k | Deep queue 4k |
---|---|---|---|---|
Samsung 850 Evo 250GB-$100
181GB free (System drive)
Firmware: EMT03B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 195 113 84 193 196 187 MB/s
|
43.8%
Average
|
|||
JMicron Generic 1TB
806GB free, PID 0578
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 24 20 16 24 23 24 MB/s
|
8.88%
Terrible
|
|||
SanDisk Ultra 64GB
12GB free, PID 5590
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 3.3 5.9 4.9 0.6 4.3 MB/s
|
9.24%
Terrible
|
|||
Memory Kit | Bench | Multi core | Single core | Latency |
---|---|---|---|---|
Hynix HMT351S6BFR8C-H9 2x4GB
2 of 4 slots used
8GB SODIMM DDR3 1334 MHz
|
20.1%
Poor
|
|||
L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds
|
|
|
CPU | |
---|---|
Core i3 M 380Intel $130Bench 40%, 21,755 samples | 54x |
Pentium P6200IntelBench 36%, 8,041 samples | 36x |
Core i5 M 480IntelBench 41%, 16,023 samples | 31x |
GPU | |
---|---|
HD Graphics (Arrandale 0.667/0.766 GHz)IntelBench 1%, 99,513 samples | 131x |
GeForce 315MNvidiaBench 1%, 3,213 samples | 35x |
R7 240AMDBench 5%, 58,337 samples | 1x |
EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER | Value: 44% - Average | Total price: $158 |