Asus P9X79

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 74%
Battleship
Desktop
Desktop 81%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 60%
Gunboat
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (47th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 53 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 76.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics97% is a very good 3D score, it's the business. This GPU can handle recent 3D games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive96.5% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
MotherboardAsus P9X79  (all builds)
Memory13.8 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit Farben
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20140724
Uptime0 Days
Run DateSep 29 '18 at 05:40
Run Duration169 Seconds
Run User DEU-User
Background CPU4%

 PC Performing as expected (47th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-3820
LGA2011, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 3.45 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (91st percentile)
76.6% Very good
Memory 87.5
1-Core 97.9
2-Core 200
74% 129 Pts
4-Core 364
8-Core 463
53% 414 Pts
64-Core 489
30% 489 Pts
Poor: 56%
This bench: 76.6%
Great: 80%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1070-Ti-$299
CLim: 1911 MHz, MLim: 2002 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 388.13
Performing above expectations (82nd percentile)
97% Outstanding
Lighting 124
Reflection 138
Parallax 131
101% 131 fps
MRender 96.5
Gravity 126
Splatting 105
89% 109 fps
Poor: 86%
This bench: 97%
Great: 101%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Crucial MX500 500GB-$53
431GB free (System drive)
Firmware: M3CR020
SusWrite @10s intervals: 440 428 434 418 368 372 MB/s
Performing below expectations (22nd percentile)
96.5% Outstanding
Read 456
Write 427
Mixed 407
SusWrite 410
96% 425 MB/s
4K Read 25
4K Write 66.1
4K Mixed 36.8
120% 42.6 MB/s
DQ Read 363
DQ Write 342
DQ Mixed 291
235% 332 MB/s
Poor: 78%
This bench: 96.5%
Great: 125%
WD Green 1TB (2010)-$139
911GB free
Firmware: 51.0AB51
SusWrite @10s intervals: 82 80 82 83 83 81 MB/s
Performing above expectations (63rd percentile)
47.3% Average
Read 82.7
Write 73.3
Mixed 60.4
SusWrite 82.1
55% 74.6 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.1
4K Mixed 0.6
116% 0.8 MB/s
Poor: 29%
This bench: 47.3%
Great: 59%
WD Green 1TB (2009)-$72
162GB free
Firmware: 80.00A80
SusWrite @10s intervals: 62 61 63 62 64 66 MB/s
Performing as expected (40th percentile)
38.7% Below average
Read 71.7
Write 69.2
Mixed 51.5
SusWrite 63
47% 63.8 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 1.6
4K Mixed 0.5
106% 0.87 MB/s
Poor: 23%
This bench: 38.7%
Great: 57%
Hitachi Deskstar 7K1000.C 1TB-$70
427GB free
Firmware: JP4OA39C
SusWrite @10s intervals: 93 95 91 96 92 98 MB/s
Performing as expected (46th percentile)
55.8% Above average
Read 100
Write 79.1
Mixed 50.4
SusWrite 94.2
59% 80.9 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 1.3
4K Mixed 0.8
146% 0.97 MB/s
Poor: 30%
This bench: 55.8%
Great: 74%
ST315003 41AS 1.5TB
100GB free, PID 55aa
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 26 26 26 25 26 25 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (11th percentile)
14.1% Very poor
Read 25.7
Write 9
Mixed 12.8
SusWrite 25.6
23% 18.3 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.5
4K Mixed 0.8
81% 1 MB/s
Poor: 14%
This bench: 14.1%
Great: 47%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
G.SKILL Ripjaws DDR3 1600 C9 4x4GB
4 of 8 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1333 MHz
Performing below potential (21st percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
48.4% Average
MC Read 18.4
MC Write 16.5
MC Mixed 15.3
48% 16.7 GB/s
SC Read 14.3
SC Write 14.3
SC Mixed 12.1
39% 13.6 GB/s
Latency 70
57% 70 ns
Poor: 39%
This bench: 48.4%
Great: 63%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical P9X79 Builds (Compare 1,726 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 58%
Gunboat
Desktop
Desktop 77%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 47%
Yacht

Motherboard: Asus P9X79 - $300

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 59% - Above average Total price: $658
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $164Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-13600K $229Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-12400F $109Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $397
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback