Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU, SSD
Gaming 0% Incomplete	Desktop 0% Incomplete	Workstation 0% Incomplete


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (36th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 64 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 61.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Boot Drive	The boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory	12GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 12GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 9 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.

Sub-optimal background CPU (15%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

PC Performing below expectations (36^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
1st CPU: Intel Xeon E5620 5,965 User benchmarks, average bench 58% CPU0 PROCESSOR, 2 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads Base clock 2.4 GHz Performing above expectations (67^th percentile)	61.3% Good	Memory 78.2 1-Core 59.4 2-Core 116 53% 84.7 Pts	4-Core 241 8-Core 446 41% 343 Pts	64-Core 634 39% 634 Pts
Poor: 47% ↑ This bench: 61.3% Great: 66%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia Quadro 4000 8,609 User benchmarks, average bench 7% HP(103C 0780) 2GB Ram: 2GB, Driver: 271.5 Relative performance n/a - atypical extreme
Poor: 7% Great: 7%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k
Hitachi HDS721025CLA382 250GB-$20 5,436 User benchmarks, average bench 52% 194GB free (System drive) Firmware: JP1O SusWrite @10s intervals: 20 33 25 20 28 32 MB/s Performing way below expectations (11^th percentile)	28.4% Poor	Read 72.9 Write 12.2 Mixed 9.7 SusWrite 26.3 22% 30.3 MB/s	4K Read 0.1 4K Write 0.6 4K Mixed 0.5 71% 0.4 MB/s
Poor: 19% ↑ This bench: 28.4% Great: 75%
video 500GB 4 User benchmarks, average bench 69% 466GB free Firmware: 1.0. SusWrite @10s intervals: 237 237 239 237 235 240 MB/s Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples	121% Outstanding	Read 185 Write 50.2 Mixed 67.6 SusWrite 238 98% 135 MB/s	4K Read 0.6 4K Write 4 4K Mixed 1.2 232% 1.93 MB/s
Poor: 26% ↑ This bench: 121% Great: 121%
SanDisk Cruzer Glide 16GB 33,521 User benchmarks, average bench 11% 13GB free, PID 5575 Operating at USB 2.1 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 3.7 3.6 3.5 3.6 3.6 3.6 MB/s Performing below expectations (32^nd percentile)	9.15% Terrible	Read 30.8 Write 3.7 Mixed 7.7 SusWrite 3.6 11% 11.4 MB/s	4K Read 3.5 4K Write 1 4K Mixed 1.6 101% 2.03 MB/s
Poor: 7% ↑ This bench: 9.15% Great: 17%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown ID:80 AD HMT112U7TFR8C-H9 ID:80 CE M391B2873EH1-CH9 ID:80 AD HMT112U7TFR8C-H9 ID:80 CE M391B2873EH1-CH9 ID:80 AD HMT112U7TFR8C-H9 ID:80 CE M391B2873EH1-CH9 ID:80 AD HMT112U7TFR8C-H9 ID:80 CE M... 46GB 1333, 1333, 1333, 1333, 1333, 1333, 1333, 1333, 1333, 1333, 1333, 1333 MHz 1024, 1024, 1024, 1024, 1024, 1024, 1024, 1024, 1024, 1024, 1024, 1024, 34816 MB Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples	45.3% Average	MC Read 17.2 MC Write 14.2 MC Mixed 19 48% 16.8 GB/s	SC Read 10.5 SC Write 6.6 SC Mixed 7.5 23% 8.2 GB/s	Latency 84 48% 84 ns

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 10%

Tree trunk

Desktop 60%

Destroyer

Workstation 10%

Tree trunk

CPU
CPU: Intel Xeon X56501stBench 64%, 7,756 samples	319x
CPU: Intel Xeon X56751stBench 68%, 4,275 samples	189x
CPU: Intel Xeon X56701stBench 67%, 4,676 samples	180x

SSD
WDS100T2B0A-00SM50 1TBWDCBench 98%, 74,123 samples	38x
850 Evo 500GBSamsung $94Bench 112%, 695,664 samples	34x
850 Evo 250GBSamsung $100Bench 103%, 951,591 samples	34x

RAM
ID:80 CE M393B5170FH0-CH9 ID:80 CE M393B5170FH0-CH9 ID:80 CE M393B5170FH0-CH9 ID:80 CE M393B5170FH0-CH9 ID:80 CE M393B5170FH0-CH9 ID:80 CE M393B5170FH0-CH9 58GBUnknownBench 50%, 261 samples	23x
ID:80 2C 36JSZF51272PZ1G4F1 ID:80 2C 36JSZF51272PZ1G4F1 ID:80 2C 36JSZF51272PZ1G4F1 ID:80 2C 36JSZF51272PZ1G4F1 ID:80 2C 36JSZF51272PZ1G4F1 ID:80 2C 36JSZF51272PZ1G4F1 ID:80 2C 36JSZF51272PZ1G4F1 JE... 82GBUnknownBench 53%, 67 samples	19x
ID:80 AD HMT31GR7BFR4C-H9 ID:80 AD HMT31GR7BFR4C-H9 ID:80 AD HMT31GR7BFR4C-H9 ID:80 AD HMT31GR7BFR4C-H9 ID:80 AD HMT31GR7BFR4C-H9 ID:80 AD HMT31GR7BFR4C-H9 ID:80 AD HMT31GR7BFR4C-H9 ID:80 AD H... 130GBUnknownBench 53%, 67 samples	16x

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $39	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $32	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16