HP HPE-505cs

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 3%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 60%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (66th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 34 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 69%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics5.12% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory4GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 4GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
SystemHP HPE-505cs  (all builds)
MotherboardPEGATRON 2AB6
Memory1 GB free of 4 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit barev
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20110216
Uptime5 Days
Run DateSep 25 '18 at 16:16
Run Duration126 Seconds
Run User GBR-User
Background CPU5%

 PC Performing above expectations (66th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-2300
CPU 1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2.8 GHz, turbo 2.9 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (83rd percentile)
69% Good
Memory 88.7
1-Core 76.9
2-Core 152
64% 106 Pts
4-Core 286
8-Core 286
38% 286 Pts
64-Core 272
17% 272 Pts
Poor: 50%
This bench: 69%
Great: 71%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GeForce GT 440
MSI(1462 2311) 1.5GB
CLim: 594 MHz, MLim: 400 MHz, Ram: 1.5GB, Driver: 388.73
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
5.12% Terrible
Lighting 5.73
Reflection 6.81
Parallax 4.72
5% 5.75 fps
MRender 7.67
Gravity 5.63
Splatting 8.26
6% 7.19 fps
Poor: 3%
This bench: 5.12%
Great: 4%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Hitachi Deskstar 7K1000.C 1TB-$70
874GB free (System drive)
Firmware: JP4OA3GH
SusWrite @10s intervals: 52 59 44 68 83 93 MB/s
Performing as expected (43rd percentile)
55.1% Above average
Read 126
Write 127
Mixed 60.3
SusWrite 66.6
70% 94.8 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.4
4K Mixed 0.9
155% 1 MB/s
Poor: 30%
This bench: 55.1%
Great: 74%
Generic- SM/xD-Picture 2GB
2GB free, PID 6362
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 2.2 2.3 2.3 2.3 2.3 2.3 MB/s
Performing as expected (50th percentile)
1.23% Terrible
Read 5
Write 1.5
Mixed 2.5
SusWrite 2.3
3% 2.83 MB/s
4K Read 0
4K Write 0
4K Mixed 0
0% 0 MB/s
Poor: 1%
This bench: 1.23%
Great: 2%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Micron 8JTF25664AZ-1G4D1 2x2GB
2 of 4 slots used
4GB DIMM DDR3 1333 MHz
Performing as expected (56th percentile)
45.7% Average
MC Read 16.3
MC Write 16.1
MC Mixed 14.4
45% 15.6 GB/s
SC Read 12.4
SC Write 13.2
SC Mixed 13.5
37% 13 GB/s
Latency 68.8
58% 68.8 ns
Poor: 21%
This bench: 45.7%
Great: 50%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical HPE-505cs Builds (Compare 2 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 10%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 63%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 9%
Tree trunk

System: HP HPE-505cs

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 34% - Below average Total price: $104
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $160Nvidia RTX 4060 $290WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $388WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $79
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $363
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback