Gigabyte GA-X58A-UD5

Performance Results


Gaming 54% Yacht	Desktop 74% Battleship	Workstation 41% Speed boat


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (34th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 66 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 65.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics	78.3% is a very good 3D score, it's the business. This GPU can handle recent 3D games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive	44.7% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory	24GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 24GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Motherboard	Gigabyte GA-X58A-UD5 (all builds)
Memory	17.6 GB free of 24 GB @ 0.4 GHz
Display	Χρώματα 3840 x 2160 - 32 Bit
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20100824
Uptime	0.8 Days
Run Date	Sep 25 '18 at 06:47
Run Duration	206 Seconds
Run User	GRC-User
Background CPU	0%

Watch Gameplay: 1070 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

PC Performing below expectations (34^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i7-950-$100 36,389 User benchmarks, average bench 66% Socket 1366, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads Base clock 3.05 GHz, turbo 2.65 GHz (avg) Performing as expected (51^st percentile)	65.5% Good	Memory 92.1 1-Core 79.4 2-Core 140 64% 104 Pts	4-Core 222 8-Core 261 31% 242 Pts	64-Core 290 18% 290 Pts
Poor: 54% ↑ This bench: 65.5% Great: 74%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1070-$132 1,459,281 User benchmarks, average bench 80% Asus(1043 8597) CLim: 1911 MHz, MLim: 2002 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 388.13 Performing below potential (42^nd percentile) - GPU OC Guide	78.3% Very good	Lighting 97 Reflection 109 Parallax 103 79% 103 fps	MRender 94.9 Gravity 91.5 Splatting 94.8 77% 93.7 fps
Poor: 71% ↑ This bench: 78.3% Great: 88%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung 850 Pro 1TB-$210 25,365 User benchmarks, average bench 105% 150GB free (System drive) Firmware: EXM04B6Q SusWrite @10s intervals: 183 169 192 189 197 190 MB/s Relative performance (0^th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable	44.7% Average	Read 204 Write 202 Mixed 189 SusWrite 187 44% 195 MB/s	4K Read 18.4 4K Write 31.6 4K Mixed 22.7 74% 24.2 MB/s	DQ Read 28.5 DQ Write 61.4 DQ Mixed 37.1 30% 42.3 MB/s
Poor: 77% ↑ This bench: 44.7% Great: 124%
Samsung 850 PRO 1TB 1TB free Firmware: 80.00A80 SusWrite @10s intervals: 108 105 111 112 111 105 MB/s Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples		Read 112 Write 104 Mixed 67 SusWrite 109 22% 98 MB/s	4K Read 0.9 4K Write 2.4 4K Mixed 0.9 4% 1.4 MB/s

Amcc 9650SE-8LPML 2TB 6 User benchmarks, average bench 64% 141GB free Firmware: 3.06 SusWrite @10s intervals: 30 30 31 31 32 30 MB/s Performing way below expectations (8^th percentile)	30.7% Below average	Read 76.2 Write 28.5 Mixed 30.2 SusWrite 30.7 30% 41.4 MB/s	4K Read 0.6 4K Write 0.4 4K Mixed 0.4 77% 0.47 MB/s
Poor: 31% ↑ This bench: 30.7% Great: 93%
Amcc 9650SE-8LPML 2TB 6 User benchmarks, average bench 64% 1.5TB free Firmware: 3.06 SusWrite @10s intervals: 34 32 34 34 34 33 MB/s Performing way below expectations (17^th percentile)	47.4% Average	Read 132 Write 34 Mixed 40.2 SusWrite 33.3 44% 59.9 MB/s	4K Read 0.7 4K Write 0.5 4K Mixed 0.5 94% 0.57 MB/s
Poor: 31% ↑ This bench: 47.4% Great: 93%
SAMSUNG HD204UI 2TB 5 User benchmarks, average bench 46% 10GB free, PID 9561 Operating at USB 3.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 55 59 45 69 74 32 MB/s Performing way below expectations (10^th percentile)	34% Below average	Read 103 Write 118 Mixed 57.2 SusWrite 55.7 110% 83.4 MB/s	4K Read 0.6 4K Write 2.2 4K Mixed 1 111% 1.27 MB/s
Poor: 34% ↑ This bench: 34% Great: 56%
WDC WD20 EARX-00PASB0 2TB 8 User benchmarks, average bench 23% 5GB free, PID 9561 Operating at USB 3.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 28 33 36 29 30 33 MB/s Performing way below expectations (19^th percentile)	13.3% Very poor	Read 29.2 Write 54.5 Mixed 28.2 SusWrite 31.3 51% 35.8 MB/s	4K Read 0.5 4K Write 0.7 4K Mixed 0.5 43% 0.57 MB/s
Poor: 13% ↑ This bench: 13.3% Great: 39%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown 6x4GB 28,320 User benchmarks, average bench 47% 6 of 6 slots used 24GB DIMM Performing way above expectations (92^nd percentile)	58.3% Above average	MC Read 22 MC Write 18.4 MC Mixed 22.7 60% 21 GB/s	SC Read 12.3 SC Write 12.4 SC Mixed 14.6 37% 13.1 GB/s	Latency 63.9 63% 63.9 ns
Poor: 36% ↑ This bench: 58.3% Great: 61%

Take a copy of your results

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical GA-X58A-UD5 Builds (Compare 343 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 23%

Surfboard

Desktop 73%

Battleship

Workstation 19%

Surfboard

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-X58A-UD5

CPU
Core i7-950Intel $100Bench 66%, 36,389 samples	80x
Core i7 930Intel $199Bench 64%, 19,497 samples	58x
Core i7 960Intel $220Bench 68%, 16,233 samples	45x

GPU
GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples	18x
GTX 1070Nvidia $132Bench 80%, 1,459,281 samples	18x
GTX 1080-TiNvidia $485Bench 124%, 840,268 samples	16x

SSD
850 Evo 250GBSamsung $100Bench 103%, 951,591 samples	13x
860 Evo 500GBSamsung $80Bench 105%, 762,998 samples	12x
MX500 1TBCrucial $66Bench 106%, 202,785 samples	9x

RAM
6x4GBUnknownBench 47%, 28,320 samples	75x
6x2GBUnknownBench 46%, 38,297 samples	44x
3x4GBUnknownBench 42%, 39,448 samples	43x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 66% - Good

Total price: $259

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $269	Nvidia RTX 4060 $295	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $177	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16