Today's hottest deals

HP OMEN by HP Laptop 15-ce0xx

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 40%
Speed boat
Desktop
Desktop 86%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 32%
Sail boat
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (76th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 24 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 80.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics46.8% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive171% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (11%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
6 years ago, 6 years ago.
SystemHP OMEN by HP Laptop 15-ce0xx  (all builds)
MotherboardHP 8390
Memory5.3 GB free of 8 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit couleurs
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20180226
Uptime0 Days
Run DateSep 22 '18 at 20:39
Run Duration148 Seconds
Run User FRA-User
Background CPU 11%

 PC Performing above expectations (76th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-7300HQ
U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2.5 GHz, turbo 3.1 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
80.2% Excellent
Memory 91.4
1-Core 110
2-Core 208
79% 136 Pts
4-Core 399
8-Core 399
53% 399 Pts
64-Core 388
24% 388 Pts
Poor: 32%
This bench: 80.2%
Great: 69%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1060 (Mobile Max-Q)
HP(103C 8390) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1670 MHz, MLim: 2002 MHz, Ram: 6GB, Driver: 398.36
Performing way above expectations (91st percentile)
46.8% Average
Lighting 55.8
Reflection 64.5
Parallax 53.3
46% 57.9 fps
MRender 67
Gravity 53.7
Splatting 60.8
50% 60.5 fps
Poor: 35%
This bench: 46.8%
Great: 48%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung MZVLW128HEGR-000H1 128GB
50GB free (System drive)
Firmware: CXB73H1Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 290 172 173 174 173 173 MB/s
Performing above expectations (62nd percentile)
171% Outstanding
Read 1,156
Write 744
Mixed 528
SusWrite 192
145% 655 MB/s
4K Read 57.7
4K Write 134
4K Mixed 71
249% 87.4 MB/s
DQ Read 886
DQ Write 754
DQ Mixed 705
560% 782 MB/s
Poor: 101%
This bench: 171%
Great: 317%
HGST Travelstar 7K1000 2.5" 1TB
903GB free
Firmware: JB0OA3T0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 112 115 119 117 121 120 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (95th percentile)
74.5% Very good
Read 142
Write 112
Mixed 28.2
SusWrite 117
72% 99.9 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.7
4K Mixed 0.6
127% 1 MB/s
Poor: 35%
This bench: 74.5%
Great: 75%
Imation Nano Pro 8GB
7GB free, PID 063e
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 3.2 2.1 2.8 2.5 2.8 2.9 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (12th percentile)
3.69% Terrible
Read 16
Write 12.2
Mixed 13.5
SusWrite 2.7
14% 11.1 MB/s
4K Read 3.3
4K Write 0
4K Mixed 0
12% 1.1 MB/s
Poor: 4%
This bench: 3.69%
Great: 7%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston HP26D4S9S8MH-8 1x8GB
1 of 2 slots used
8GB SODIMM DDR4 2667 MHz clocked @ 2400 MHz
Performing below potential (99th percentile) - Ensure that the top XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
44.7% Average
MC Read 16.2
MC Write 16.1
MC Mixed 11.8
42% 14.7 GB/s
SC Read 13.2
SC Write 16.6
SC Mixed 14.3
42% 14.7 GB/s
Latency 65.1
61% 65.1 ns
Poor: 21%
This bench: 44.7%
Great: 43%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical OMEN by HP Laptop 15-ce0xx Builds (Compare 3,479 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 8%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 61%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 7%
Tree trunk

System: HP OMEN by HP Laptop 15-ce0xx

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $159Nvidia RTX 4060 $270WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $380WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $75
Intel Core i5-13600K $210Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback