Asus PRIME B350-PLUS

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 33%
Sail boat
Desktop
Desktop 85%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 30%
Raft
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (73rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 27 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 77%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics36.6% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive211% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (18%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
MotherboardAsus PRIME B350-PLUS  (all builds)
Memory5.9 GB free of 8 GB @ 3 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit Farben
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20180820
Uptime0 Days
Run DateSep 22 '18 at 19:24
Run Duration225 Seconds
Run User DEU-User
Background CPU 18%
Watch Gameplay: 1050-Ti + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing above expectations (73rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 5 1400-$87
AM4, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.2 GHz, turbo 3.65 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
77% Very good
Memory 80.6
1-Core 113
2-Core 234
79% 142 Pts
4-Core 395
8-Core 643
64% 519 Pts
64-Core 640
40% 640 Pts
Poor: 51%
This bench: 77%
Great: 69%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1050-Ti-$59
PNY(196E 11C3) ≥ 4GB; VCGGTX1050T4XGPB-OC
CLim: 2126 MHz, MLim: 1952 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 398.82
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
36.6% Below average
Lighting 47.2
Reflection 34
Parallax 44.6
38% 41.9 fps
MRender 39.5
Gravity 43.2
Splatting 38.9
33% 40.5 fps
Poor: 27%
This bench: 36.6%
Great: 33%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Adata S510 120GB
90GB free
Firmware: 320ABBF0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 75 95 95 96 97 97 MB/s
Performing below potential (7th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
51.7% Above average
Read 156
Write 116
Mixed 136
SusWrite 92.3
28% 125 MB/s
4K Read 23.8
4K Write 75.7
4K Mixed 27.7
112% 42.4 MB/s
DQ Read 143
DQ Write 116
DQ Mixed 113
89% 124 MB/s
Poor: 49%
This bench: 51.7%
Great: 79%
Samsung PM961 NVMe PCIe M.2 256GB
122GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 4L7Q Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 478 322 322 322 320 314 MB/s
Performing above expectations (81st percentile)
211% Outstanding
Read 1,779
Write 1,155
Mixed 790
SusWrite 346
225% 1,018 MB/s
4K Read 59.6
4K Write 136
4K Mixed 73.7
257% 89.9 MB/s
DQ Read 968
DQ Write 792
DQ Mixed 831
636% 864 MB/s
Poor: 106%
This bench: 211%
Great: 236%
Samsung HD103UI 1TB
723GB free
Firmware: 1AA01113
SusWrite @10s intervals: 85 82 84 83 83 83 MB/s
Performing below expectations (40th percentile)
36.4% Below average
Read 43.2
Write 26.7
Mixed 29.8
SusWrite 83.3
34% 45.8 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 1.9
4K Mixed 0.8
149% 1.1 MB/s
Poor: 25%
This bench: 36.4%
Great: 51%
Samsung Spinpoint F4 2TB-$119
391GB free
Firmware: 1AQ10001
SusWrite @10s intervals: 130 127 131 129 128 129 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (88th percentile)
67.6% Good
Read 107
Write 122
Mixed 60.3
SusWrite 129
76% 105 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.9
4K Mixed 1
176% 1.2 MB/s
Poor: 32%
This bench: 67.6%
Great: 72%
Asmt 2105 400GB
227GB free
Firmware: 0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 62 63 65 64 64 64 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
33.9% Below average
Read 54.2
Write 58.3
Mixed 41.2
SusWrite 63.7
40% 54.3 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 1.1
4K Mixed 0.7
123% 0.8 MB/s
Poor: 15%
This bench: 33.9%
Great: 34%
TOSHIBA External USB 3.0 3TB
1.5TB free, PID a202
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 130 133 134 133 132 132 MB/s
Performing above expectations (68th percentile)
43.2% Average
Read 62.3
Write 59
Mixed 28.3
SusWrite 132
99% 70.5 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 1.7
4K Mixed 0.7
84% 1 MB/s
Poor: 15%
This bench: 43.2%
Great: 53%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Crucial BLS8G4D26BFSE.16FBD2 1x8GB
1 of 4 slots used
8GB DIMM DDR4 3000 MHz clocked @ 1500 MHz
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
58.4% Above average
MC Read 21.9
MC Write 19.4
MC Mixed 18.6
57% 20 GB/s
SC Read 19.5
SC Write 21
SC Mixed 20.4
58% 20.3 GB/s
Latency 79.4
50% 79.4 ns
Poor: 37%
This bench: 58.4%
Great: 53%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical PRIME B350-PLUS Builds (Compare 4,339 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 45%
Yacht
Desktop
Desktop 77%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 42%
Speed boat

Motherboard: Asus PRIME B350-PLUS - $92

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 90% - Outstanding Total price: $448
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $163Nvidia RTX 4060 $290WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-13600K $249Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $383
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback