Asrock 970M Pro3

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 20%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 71%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 17%
Surfboard
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (65th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 35 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 67.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics27.1% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive58.6% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (39%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
MotherboardAsrock 970M Pro3  (all builds)
Memory4.8 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1920x1080x4294967296 szín
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20160617
Uptime0.6 Days
Run DateSep 18 '18 at 10:13
Run Duration157 Seconds
Run User HUN-User
Background CPU 39%

 PC Performing above expectations (65th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD FX-8350-$130
CPUSocket, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 4 GHz, turbo 4.05 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (94th percentile)
67.5% Good
Memory 87.8
1-Core 68.3
2-Core 130
60% 95.5 Pts
4-Core 258
8-Core 360
39% 309 Pts
64-Core 428
26% 428 Pts
Poor: 48%
This bench: 67.5%
Great: 68%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 950-$100
Gigabyte(1458 36C3) 2GB
CLim: 1430 MHz, MLim: 1652 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 399.24
Performing above expectations (85th percentile)
27.1% Poor
Lighting 32.9
Reflection 30.9
Parallax 27.1
27% 30.3 fps
MRender 37.2
Gravity 31.9
Splatting 32.5
28% 33.9 fps
Poor: 22%
This bench: 27.1%
Great: 28%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Adata SU650 120GB-$14
39GB free (System drive)
Firmware: V3.10
SusWrite @10s intervals: 320 362 378 208 54 88 MB/s
Performing as expected (44th percentile)
58.6% Above average
Read 400
Write 350
Mixed 271
SusWrite 235
70% 314 MB/s
4K Read 24.1
4K Write 62.5
4K Mixed 9.2
81% 31.9 MB/s
DQ Read 82.9
DQ Write 152
DQ Mixed 15.6
41% 83.5 MB/s
Poor: 37%
This bench: 58.6%
Great: 88%
WD Blue 500GB (2008)-$24
150GB free
Firmware: 05.01D05
SusWrite @10s intervals: 122 129 131 132 130 130 MB/s
Performing above expectations (82nd percentile)
60.4% Good
Read 81
Write 86.3
Mixed 60
SusWrite 129
65% 89.1 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.9
4K Mixed 0.9
164% 1.17 MB/s
Poor: 28%
This bench: 60.4%
Great: 69%
Toshiba DT01ACA100 1TB-$26
245GB free
Firmware: MS2OA750
SusWrite @10s intervals: 160 154 155 163 169 169 MB/s
Performing above expectations (69th percentile)
95% Outstanding
Read 170
Write 155
Mixed 38.5
SusWrite 162
95% 131 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 2.1
4K Mixed 0.6
135% 1.13 MB/s
Poor: 47%
This bench: 95%
Great: 107%
General USB Flash Disk 8GB
4GB free, PID 6387
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 2.9 4 4 4.3 4.2 4.1 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (20th percentile)
1.98% Terrible
Read 7
Write 5
Mixed 4.3
SusWrite 3.9
6% 5.05 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 0
4K Mixed 0
2% 0.17 MB/s
Poor: 2%
This bench: 1.98%
Great: 4%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston 99U5471-054.A00LF 1x8GB
1 of 4 slots used
8GB DIMM DDR3 1600 MHz clocked @ 800 MHz
Performing above expectations (62nd percentile)
30.8% Below average
MC Read 10.9
MC Write 10
MC Mixed 8.5
28% 9.8 GB/s
SC Read 10.3
SC Write 8.1
SC Mixed 9.4
26% 9.27 GB/s
Latency 69.7
57% 69.7 ns
Poor: 20%
This bench: 30.8%
Great: 34%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical 970M Pro3 Builds (Compare 848 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 22%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 68%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 18%
Surfboard

Motherboard: Asrock 970M Pro3

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 80% - Very good Total price: $217
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $163Nvidia RTX 4060 $290WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-13600K $249Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $383
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback