Fujitsu S6510

Performance Results


Gaming 2% Tree trunk	Desktop 14% Tree trunk	Workstation 2% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing way below expectations (16th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 84 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With an extremely low single core score, this CPU can barely handle email and light web browsing. Finally, with a gaming score of 10.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is terrible.
Graphics	0.22% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	30.3% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory	4GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 4GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 8.1 is a recent version of Windows, it's worth upgrading to Windows 10 which has had several improvements made to the user interface including a better homescreen.

Very high background CPU (56%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU. CPU throttled at 42% by Windows. Ensure maximum processor state is set to 100% via Settings > System > Power & sleep > Additional power settings > Change plan settings > Change advanced power settings > Processor power management > Maximum processor state.

System	Fujitsu S6510 (all builds)
Motherboard	FUJITSU FJNB1D3
Memory	2.2 GB free of 4 GB @ 0.3 GHz
Display	1280 x 800 - 32 Bit 色彩, 1280 x 800 - 32 Bit 色彩
OS	Windows 8.1
BIOS Date	20090205
Uptime	0.1 Days
Run Date	Sep 16 '18 at 12:02
Run Duration	197 Seconds
Run User	HKG-User
Background CPU	56%
CPU Throttled	42%

PC Performing way below expectations (16^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core2 Extreme X9000 347 User benchmarks, average bench 40% Onboard, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 2 threads Base clock 2.8 GHz, turbo 1.05 GHz (avg) Performing way below expectations (0^th percentile)	10.9% Very poor	Memory 16.7 1-Core 16.3 2-Core 30.6 13% 21.2 Pts	4-Core 29.7 8-Core 34.1 4% 31.9 Pts	64-Core 22.6 1% 22.6 Pts
Poor: 26% ↑ This bench: 10.9% Great: 44%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Mobile Intel 965 Express Chipset Family 3,066 User benchmarks, average bench 0% Fujitsu(10CF 13F7) Driver: igdumd64.dll Ver. 8.15.10.2697 Performing as expected (50^th percentile)	0.22% Terrible	Lighting 0.3 Reflection 0.15 Parallax 0.16 0% 0.2 fps	MRender 0.14 Gravity 0.2 Splatting 0.26 0% 0.2 fps
Poor: 0% ↑ This bench: 0.22% Great: 1%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung MZ7TE256HMHP-000L7 256GB 4,594 User benchmarks, average bench 70% 202GB free (System drive) Firmware: EXT09L6Q SusWrite @10s intervals: 123 152 157 116 63 57 MB/s Performing below potential (0^th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable	30.3% Below average	Read 134 Write 56.3 Mixed 116 SusWrite 111 23% 104 MB/s	4K Read 15.2 4K Write 29.1 4K Mixed 12.9 55% 19.1 MB/s	DQ Read 22.9 DQ Write 44.4 DQ Mixed 16.7 18% 28 MB/s
Poor: 45% ↑ This bench: 30.3% Great: 91%
WD My Passport Essential USB 3.0 500GB 2,842 User benchmarks, average bench 21% 30GB free, PID 0730 Operating at USB 2.1 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 15 16 16 15 11 10 MB/s Performing way below expectations (8^th percentile)	10.8% Very poor	Read 27.5 Write 18.5 Mixed 19.4 SusWrite 13.7 25% 19.8 MB/s	4K Read 0.4 4K Write 1.2 4K Mixed 0.7 66% 0.77 MB/s
Poor: 11% ↑ This bench: 10.8% Great: 32%
ST500LM000-1EJ16 500GB 13 User benchmarks, average bench 34% 123GB free, PID 1068 Operating at USB 2.1 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 16 18 18 16 12 11 MB/s Performing below expectations (23^rd percentile)	19% Very poor	Read 12.3 Write 18.6 Mixed 13.5 SusWrite 14.9 21% 14.8 MB/s	4K Read 0.8 4K Write 4.5 4K Mixed 1.2 197% 2.17 MB/s
Poor: 19% ↑ This bench: 19% Great: 53%
Philips USB Flash Drive 16GB 255 User benchmarks, average bench 16% 2GB free, PID 5500 Operating at USB 2.1 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 6.3 6.9 6.2 5.1 4.4 3.7 MB/s Performing below expectations (28^th percentile)	8.93% Terrible	Read 30 Write 11.4 Mixed 14.5 SusWrite 5.4 18% 15.3 MB/s	4K Read 4 4K Write 0.8 4K Mixed 1.1 79% 1.97 MB/s
Poor: 4% ↑ This bench: 8.93% Great: 33%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown 2x2GB 446,702 User benchmarks, average bench 20% 2 of 2 slots used 4GB SODIMM DDR2 Performing way below expectations (5^th percentile)	9.15% Terrible	MC Read 2.7 MC Write 3.8 MC Mixed 3.5 10% 3.33 GB/s	SC Read 1.6 SC Write 1.7 SC Mixed 1.6 5% 1.63 GB/s	Latency 346 12% 346 ns
Poor: 10% ↑ This bench: 9.15% Great: 44%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $171	Nvidia RTX 4060 $293	Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-13600K $273	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i3-12100F $80	Nvidia RTX 4070 $500	Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $32	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16

Fujitsu S6510

Performance Results

PC Performing way below expectations (16th percentile)

System Memory Latency Ladder

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

Feedback

PC Performing way below expectations (16^th percentile)