Asus M5A99FX PRO R2.0

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 10%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 60%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 9%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (51st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 49 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 61.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics9.44% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive76.5% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
8 years ago, 8 years ago.
MotherboardAsus M5A99FX PRO R2.0  (all builds)
Memory13.6 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.1 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20140407
Uptime0.2 Days
Run DateMay 08 '16 at 17:35
Run Duration313 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU4%

 PC Performing as expected (51st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD FX-8350-$130
Socket 942, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 4 GHz, turbo 3.95 GHz (avg)
Performing as expected (49th percentile)
61.1% Good
Memory 76.4
1-Core 73.9
2-Core 127
57% 92.3 Pts
4-Core 248
8-Core 436
41% 342 Pts
64-Core 466
29% 466 Pts
Poor: 48%
This bench: 61.1%
Great: 68%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD Radeon R7 250
MSI(1462 3012) 2GB
Driver: aticfx64.dll Ver. 15.300.1025.1001
Performing above expectations (70th percentile)
9.44% Terrible
Lighting 12.1
Reflection 13
Parallax 17.8
10% 14.3 fps
MRender 7.48
Gravity 12.7
Splatting 11
9% 10.4 fps
Poor: 8%
This bench: 9.44%
Great: 10%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
OCZ ARC 100 240GB-$120
129GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 1.00 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (18th percentile)
76.5% Very good
Read 393
Write 420
Mixed 417
92% 410 MB/s
4K Read 20.4
4K Write 58.7
4K Mixed 22.6
91% 33.9 MB/s
DQ Read 193
DQ Write 141
DQ Mixed 74.7
81% 136 MB/s
Poor: 65%
This bench: 76.5%
Great: 101%
WD WD10EACS-00ZJB0 1TB
820GB free
Firmware: 01.0 Max speed: SATA 2.0 300 MB/s
Performing above expectations (61st percentile)
40.8% Average
Read 68.3
Write 73.6
Mixed 66.6
52% 69.5 MB/s
4K Read 0.59
4K Write 1.91
4K Mixed 0.29
93% 0.93 MB/s
Poor: 26%
This bench: 40.8%
Great: 51%
WD Green 1TB (2011)-$109
236GB free
Firmware: 51.0 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing as expected (58th percentile)
54.7% Above average
Read 105
Write 85.9
Mixed 83.8
69% 91.4 MB/s
4K Read 0.45
4K Write 1.67
4K Mixed 0.17
68% 0.76 MB/s
Poor: 28%
This bench: 54.7%
Great: 69%
Seagate Expansion Desk 5TB
3TB free, PID 3322
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
Performing as expected (48th percentile)
53.9% Above average
Read 139
Write 95.4
Mixed 49.3
108% 94.4 MB/s
4K Read 0.83
4K Write 4.16
4K Mixed 0.62
166% 1.87 MB/s
Poor: 15%
This bench: 53.9%
Great: 76%
WDC WD20 EARX-00PASB0 2TB
970GB free, PID null
Performing way above expectations (95th percentile)
41.9% Average
Read 99.9
Write 97.6
Mixed 8.71
79% 68.8 MB/s
4K Read 0.43
4K Write 1.97
4K Mixed 0.16
74% 0.85 MB/s
Poor: 14%
This bench: 41.9%
Great: 42%
ST2000DM 001-9YN164 2TB
288GB free, PID null
Performing as expected (59th percentile)
54% Above average
Read 31.6
Write 118
Mixed 7.58
74% 52.4 MB/s
4K Read 0.63
4K Write 7.67
4K Mixed 0.31
274% 2.87 MB/s
Poor: 12%
This bench: 54%
Great: 93%
Hitachi HTS545032B9A300 320GB
9GB free, PID 1001
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
Performing as expected (46th percentile)
13.4% Very poor
Read 26.9
Write 25.8
Mixed 5.99
23% 19.6 MB/s
4K Read 0.47
4K Write 1.22
4K Mixed 0.31
54% 0.67 MB/s
Poor: 12%
This bench: 13.4%
Great: 19%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
G.SKILL RipjawsX DDR3 1600 C9 4x4GB
4 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR3 1066 MHz clocked @ 533 MHz
Performing below potential (5th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
39.6% Below average
MC Read 14.8
MC Write 13.9
MC Mixed 13.1
40% 13.9 GB/s
SC Read 9.2
SC Write 9.7
SC Mixed 11.4
29% 10.1 GB/s
Latency 87.5
46% 87.5 ns
Poor: 39%
This bench: 39.6%
Great: 63%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical M5A99FX PRO R2.0 Builds (Compare 1,066 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 34%
Sail boat
Desktop
Desktop 69%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 28%
Raft

Motherboard: Asus M5A99FX PRO R2.0 - $200

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 57% - Above average Total price: $610
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $169Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $249Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $369
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback