| PC Status | Overall this PC is performing below expectations (39th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 61 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas. |
| Processor | With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 52.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average. |
| Graphics | 0.45% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics) |
| Boot Drive | 22.8% is an extremely low SSD score, this system will benefit from a faster SSD. |
| Memory | 4GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 4GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system. |
| OS Version | Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option. |
Very high background CPU (73%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
| System | HP Compaq 8200 Elite SFF PC (all builds) |
| Motherboard | Hewlett-Packard 1495 |
| Memory | 1.4 GB free of 4 GB @ 1.3 GHz |
| Display | 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors |
| OS | Windows 10 |
| BIOS Date | 20111110 |
| Uptime | 0.2 Days |
| Run Date | Sep 15 '18 at 22:02 |
| Run Duration | 152 Seconds |
| Run User | USA-User |
| Background CPU | 73% |
PC Performing below expectations (39th percentile)
Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).
| Processor | Bench | Normal | Heavy | Server |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
52.1%
Above average
|
62% 105 Pts
|
19% 137 Pts
|
9% 149 Pts
|
| Graphics Card | Bench | 3D DX9 | 3D DX10 | 3D DX11 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Intel HD 2000 (Desktop 1.1 GHz)
HP(103C 1495) 1.8GB
Driver: igdumd64.dll Ver. 9.17.10.4459
|
0.45%
Terrible
|
0% 0.17 fps
|
1% 1.06 fps
| |
| Drives | Bench | Sequential | Random 4k | Deep queue 4k |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Mushkin MKNSSDSR500GB 500GB
98GB free (System drive)
Firmware: R0522A0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 7 45 219 165 13 3.3 MB/s
|
22.8%
Poor
|
42% 185 MB/s
|
32% 8.5 MB/s
| |
|
Seagate Barracuda 7200.12 250GB-$33
218GB free
Firmware: HP35
SusWrite @10s intervals: 122 121 122 123 122 122 MB/s
|
70.2%
Very good
|
64% 87.2 MB/s
|
158% 1.1 MB/s
| |
|
Toshiba Ext HDD 500GB
378GB free, PID b001
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 25 25 27 26 25 25 MB/s
|
11%
Very poor
|
31% 23.5 MB/s
|
25% 0.37 MB/s
| |
| Memory Kit | Bench | Multi core | Single core | Latency |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Unknown 1x4GB
1 of 4 slots used
4GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1333 MHz
|
23.6%
Poor
|
21% 7.3 GB/s
|
21% 7.33 GB/s
|
49% 81 ns
|
System Memory Latency Ladder
L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds
Typical Compaq 8200 Elite SFF PC Builds (Compare 3,262 builds)
See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
|
|
|
System: HP Compaq 8200 Elite SFF PC
| CPU |
|
|---|---|
| Core i5-2400Intel $250Bench 61%, 166,255 samples | 1,669x |
| Core i5-2500IntelBench 63%, 82,538 samples | 553x |
| Core i7-2600Intel $187Bench 67%, 185,630 samples | 546x |
| GPU |
|
|---|---|
| HD 2000 (Desktop 1.1 GHz)IntelBench 1%, 150,891 samples | 1,776x |
| GT 1030NvidiaBench 14%, 185,384 samples | 275x |
| GeForce GT 710NvidiaBench 3%, 187,161 samples | 239x |
| EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER | Value: 58% - Above average | Total price: $278 |