| PC Status | Overall this PC is performing as expected (59th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 41 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. |
| Processor | With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 70.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good. |
| Graphics | 1.04% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics) |
| Boot Drive | 61.3% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times. |
| Memory | 8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system. |
| OS Version | Although Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 9 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager. |
High background CPU (30%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
| System | HP Compaq 8200 Elite USDT PC (all builds) |
| Motherboard | Hewlett-Packard 1496 |
| Memory | 6.3 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.3 GHz |
| Display | 1680 x 1050 - 32 Bit colori |
| OS | Windows 7 |
| BIOS Date | 20150324 |
| Uptime | 0 Days |
| Run Date | May 07 '16 at 12:05 |
| Run Duration | 141 Seconds |
| Run User | ITA-User |
| Background CPU | 30% |
PC Performing as expected (59th percentile)
Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).
| Processor | Bench | Normal | Heavy | Server |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Intel Core i5-2500S
SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2.7 GHz
|
70.2%
Very good
|
73% 125 Pts
|
40% 298 Pts
|
18% 296 Pts
|
| Graphics Card | Bench | 3D DX9 | 3D DX10 | 3D DX11 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Intel HD 2000 (Desktop 1.1 GHz)
HP(103C 1496) 2GB
Driver: igdumd64.dll Ver. 9.17.10.3517
|
1.04%
Terrible
|
1% 1.19 fps
|
1% 1.57 fps
| |
| Memory Kit | Bench | Multi core | Single core | Latency |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Samsung M471B5273DH0-CH9 2x4GB
2 of 2 slots used
8GB SODIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1333 MHz
|
52.1%
Above average
|
51% 17.8 GB/s
|
45% 15.8 GB/s
|
59% 68.1 ns
|
System Memory Latency Ladder
L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds
Typical Compaq 8200 Elite USDT PC Builds (Compare 277 builds)
See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
|
|
|
System: HP Compaq 8200 Elite USDT PC
| CPU |
|
|---|---|
| Core i5-2400SIntel $70Bench 60%, 10,987 samples | 136x |
| Core i5-2500SIntelBench 64%, 3,031 samples | 40x |
| Core i3-2120Intel $170Bench 51%, 77,810 samples | 28x |
| GPU |
|
|---|---|
| HD 2000 (Desktop 1.1 GHz)IntelBench 1%, 150,891 samples | 266x |
| Radeon HD 5450AMDBench 1%, 66,079 samples | 3x |
| Radeon R9 M200XAMDBench 10%, 678 samples | 2x |
| EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER | Value: 69% - Good | Total price: $98 |