Positivo POS-PIH55BO

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU, SSD
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (60th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 40 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 68.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Memory12GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 12GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (100%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemPositivo POS-PIH55BO  (all builds)
MotherboardPositivo POS-PIH55BO
Memory9 GB free of 12 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1600 x 900 - 32 Bit cores
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20100615
Uptime0 Days
Run DateSep 07 '18 at 21:14
Run Duration159 Seconds
Run User BRA-User
Background CPU 100%

 PC Performing above expectations (60th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7 870
, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 2.95 GHz, turbo 2.9 GHz (avg)
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
68.8% Good
Memory 93.2
1-Core 78.6
2-Core 146
66% 106 Pts
4-Core 242
8-Core 357
37% 300 Pts
64-Core 339
21% 339 Pts
Poor: 69%
This bench: 68.8%
Great: 72%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung HD502HJ 500GB-$50
99GB free
Firmware: 1AJ10001
SusWrite @10s intervals: 89 88 88 87 88 88 MB/s
Performing below expectations (29th percentile)
52.4% Above average
Read 94.5
Write 50.4
Mixed 60.5
SusWrite 87.7
54% 73.3 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 2.4
4K Mixed 1.2
207% 1.43 MB/s
Poor: 30%
This bench: 52.4%
Great: 77%
Samsung HD502HJ 500GB-$50
18GB free
Firmware: 1AJ10001
SusWrite @10s intervals: 78 77 77 77 77 77 MB/s
Performing as expected (54th percentile)
61.3% Good
Read 136
Write 97
Mixed 71.1
SusWrite 77.4
70% 95.3 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 3
4K Mixed 1.2
222% 1.67 MB/s
Poor: 30%
This bench: 61.3%
Great: 77%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 1TB-$28
458GB free
Firmware: CC45
SusWrite @10s intervals: 200 203 202 203 202 201 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (96th percentile)
114% Outstanding
Read 197
Write 150
Mixed 71.5
SusWrite 202
113% 155 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 2.1
4K Mixed 0.8
161% 1.23 MB/s
Poor: 55%
This bench: 114%
Great: 112%
FUJITSU MHZ2120BH G2 120GB
62GB free (System drive), PID 2329
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 23 25 23 22 23 21 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
13.6% Very poor
Read 29
Write 24.7
Mixed 21.3
SusWrite 22.9
32% 24.5 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 1.4
4K Mixed 0.5
66% 0.8 MB/s
Poor: 14%
This bench: 13.6%
Great: 17%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 12GB
1333, 1333, 1333, 1333 MHz
4096, 2048, 4096, 2048 MB
Performing above expectations (62nd percentile)
36.2% Below average
MC Read 15.3
MC Write 9.8
MC Mixed 9.8
33% 11.6 GB/s
SC Read 10.8
SC Write 10.5
SC Mixed 11
31% 10.8 GB/s
Latency 61.6
65% 61.6 ns
Poor: 20%
This bench: 36.2%
Great: 50%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical POS-PIH55BO Builds (Compare 43 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 5%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 47%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 4%
Tree trunk

System: Positivo POS-PIH55BO

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 53% - Above average Total price: $138
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $163Nvidia RTX 4060 $289WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-13600K $249Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $79
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $380
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback