Asrock 970 Extreme3

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 20%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 69%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 17%
Surfboard
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (61st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 39 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 65.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics25.2% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive52.2% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
5 years ago, 5 years ago.
MotherboardAsrock 970 Extreme3  (all builds)
Memory13.2 GB free of 16 GB @ 0.7 GHz
Display3840 x 2160 - 32 Bit couleurs
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20131002
Uptime1.9 Days
Run DateSep 05 '18 at 07:19
Run Duration176 Seconds
Run User FRA-User
Background CPU8%

 PC Performing above expectations (61st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD FX-8350-$130
CPUSocket, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 4 GHz, turbo 4.05 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (90th percentile)
65.5% Good
Memory 83.3
1-Core 62.2
2-Core 140
58% 95.1 Pts
4-Core 258
8-Core 422
42% 340 Pts
64-Core 415
26% 415 Pts
Poor: 48%
This bench: 65.5%
Great: 68%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 760-$209
Gigabyte(1458 3615) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1306 MHz, MLim: 1502 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 399.7
Performing below potential (40th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
25.2% Poor
Lighting 29
Reflection 25.4
Parallax 30.5
24% 28.3 fps
MRender 38
Gravity 35.7
Splatting 31
28% 34.9 fps
Poor: 24%
This bench: 25.2%
Great: 28%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Kingston SSDNow V300 120GB-$36
28GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 603ABBF0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 60 53 33 38 42 52 MB/s
Performing as expected (48th percentile)
52.2% Above average
Read 263
Write 124
Mixed 168
SusWrite 46.2
33% 150 MB/s
4K Read 25.3
4K Write 69.9
4K Mixed 31.9
116% 42.4 MB/s
DQ Read 30.4
DQ Write 104
DQ Mixed 37.3
37% 57.2 MB/s
Poor: 30%
This bench: 52.2%
Great: 73%
Maxtor 6B200M0 204GB-$81
26GB free
Firmware: BANC1BY0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 61 54 38 39 42 52 MB/s
Performing as expected (45th percentile)
26.6% Poor
Read 44.2
Write 42.2
Mixed 28.2
SusWrite 47.6
30% 40.6 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 3.1
4K Mixed 0.5
138% 1.4 MB/s
Poor: 19%
This bench: 26.6%
Great: 35%
WD Blue 400GB (2008)
100GB free
Firmware: 12.01C01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 64 65 65 65 65 65 MB/s
Performing above expectations (74th percentile)
39.5% Below average
Read 72.2
Write 72
Mixed 53.8
SusWrite 64.8
48% 65.7 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 2.4
4K Mixed 1
185% 1.37 MB/s
Poor: 21%
This bench: 39.5%
Great: 45%
Fujitsu MHZ2250BH G2 250GB
100GB free
Firmware: 8909
SusWrite @10s intervals: 35 36 36 36 36 36 MB/s
Performing above expectations (67th percentile)
26.5% Poor
Read 56
Write 53
Mixed 38.5
SusWrite 35.9
34% 45.8 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 1.7
4K Mixed 0.5
108% 0.9 MB/s
Poor: 10%
This bench: 26.5%
Great: 32%
WDC WD25 00BUDT-63DPZY0 250GB
77GB free, PID 2329
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 24 24 23 25 26 25 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
10.1% Very poor
Read 26
Write 24
Mixed 14.5
SusWrite 24.3
30% 22.2 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 0.3
4K Mixed 0.3
22% 0.37 MB/s
Poor: 10%
This bench: 10.1%
Great: 11%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston 9905471-006.A01LF 99U5403-052.A00LF 99U5403-052.A00LF 9905471-006.A01LF 16GB
667, 667, 667, 667 MHz
4096, 4096, 4096, 4096 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
42% Average
MC Read 16.1
MC Write 14.2
MC Mixed 14.3
42% 14.9 GB/s
SC Read 9.5
SC Write 8.3
SC Mixed 10.3
27% 9.37 GB/s
Latency 74.7
54% 74.7 ns
Poor: 42%
This bench: 42%
Great: 44%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical 970 Extreme3 Builds (Compare 275 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 34%
Sail boat
Desktop
Desktop 68%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 28%
Raft

Motherboard: Asrock 970 Extreme3 - $122

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 78% - Very good Total price: $410
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $154Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $388WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $90
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $353
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback