MSI Z97 GAMING 5 (MS-7917)

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 46%
Yacht
Desktop
Desktop 88%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 38%
Jet ski
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (37th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 63 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 87.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics50.1% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (13%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemMSI MS-7917
MotherboardMSI Z97 GAMING 5 (MS-7917)  (all builds)
Memory9.3 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20160216
Uptime0.6 Days
Run DateSep 03 '18 at 12:38
Run Duration235 Seconds
Run User AUS-User
Background CPU 13%

 PC Performing below expectations (37th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-4790K-$348
SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 4 GHz, turbo 4.4 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (96th percentile)
87.4% Excellent
Memory 97.3
1-Core 130
2-Core 244
90% 157 Pts
4-Core 423
8-Core 579
63% 501 Pts
64-Core 603
37% 603 Pts
Poor: 67%
This bench: 87.4%
Great: 87%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 980-$500
Gigabyte(1458 3669) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1493 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 398.82
Performing below potential (4th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
50.1% Above average
Lighting 58.9
Reflection 60.6
Parallax 48.7
48% 56.1 fps
MRender 67.9
Gravity 69.7
Splatting 62.7
54% 66.8 fps
Poor: 53%
This bench: 50.1%
Great: 66%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 850 Evo 250GB-$100
78GB free (System drive)
Firmware: EMT02B6Q
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 6,673
Write 5,804
Mixed 5,920
1,367% 6,132 MB/s
4K Read 429
4K Write 225
4K Mixed 285
1,134% 313 MB/s
DQ Read 1,046
DQ Write 575
DQ Mixed 768
583% 797 MB/s
Poor: 72% Great: 124%
Hitachi HDS5C3030ALA630 3TB-$124
18GB free
Firmware: MEAOA800
SusWrite @10s intervals: 75 74 74 73 71 70 MB/s
Performing above expectations (61st percentile)
54.4% Above average
Read 116
Write 116
Mixed 65.7
SusWrite 72.7
68% 92.9 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 2
4K Mixed 0.7
140% 1.1 MB/s
Poor: 29%
This bench: 54.4%
Great: 66%
Seagate Desktop HDD 4TB (2013)-$49
736GB free
Firmware: CC54
SusWrite @10s intervals: 109 107 110 112 111 110 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (17th percentile)
62.3% Good
Read 108
Write 111
Mixed 63.7
SusWrite 110
72% 97.9 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 1.5
4K Mixed 0.6
119% 0.9 MB/s
Poor: 46%
This bench: 62.3%
Great: 96%
WD Green 2TB (2011)-$60
5GB free
Firmware: 51.0AB51
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 106
Write 99.2
Mixed 77.7
70% 94.3 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 2.1
4K Mixed 0.7
150% 1.2 MB/s
Poor: 31% Great: 67%
Seagate Barracuda Green 2TB-$80
14GB free
Firmware: CC32
SusWrite @10s intervals: 75 72 76 68 70 70 MB/s
Performing below expectations (22nd percentile)
48.7% Average
Read 98
Write 72.3
Mixed 57.3
SusWrite 71.8
55% 74.9 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 0.8
4K Mixed 0.6
102% 0.63 MB/s
Poor: 38%
This bench: 48.7%
Great: 75%
Seagate Expansion Desk 3TB
5GB free
Firmware: 9401
SusWrite @10s intervals: 15 16 16 16 16 17 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (4th percentile)
14.9% Very poor
Read 35.5
Write 39.7
Mixed 30
SusWrite 15.9
23% 30.3 MB/s
4K Read 0.3
4K Write 1.3
4K Mixed 0.4
81% 0.67 MB/s
Poor: 17%
This bench: 14.9%
Great: 103%
SanDisk Cruzer Blade 16GB
15GB free, PID 5567
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 4.9 3.3 3.4 3.4 3.1 3.4 MB/s
Performing above expectations (66th percentile)
12.4% Very poor
Read 23.5
Write 11.5
Mixed 10
SusWrite 3.6
14% 12.1 MB/s
4K Read 6.2
4K Write 2.2
4K Mixed 3
200% 3.8 MB/s
Poor: 5%
This bench: 12.4%
Great: 17%
ST350041 8AS 500GB
3GB free, PID 5106
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 15 15 15 15 15 15 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (5th percentile)
13.9% Very poor
Read 37.8
Write 36.5
Mixed 29
SusWrite 15.3
39% 29.7 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.6
4K Mixed 1
91% 1.1 MB/s
Poor: 14%
This bench: 13.9%
Great: 48%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
G.SKILL TridentX DDR3 2400 C10 2x8GB
2 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 2400 MHz
Performing as expected (55th percentile)
75.1% Very good
MC Read 26.9
MC Write 28.2
MC Mixed 23.5
75% 26.2 GB/s
SC Read 18
SC Write 22.8
SC Mixed 22
60% 20.9 GB/s
Latency 49.2
81% 49.2 ns
Poor: 40%
This bench: 75.1%
Great: 88%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Z97 GAMING 5 (MS-7917) Builds (Compare 6,883 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 42%
Speed boat
Desktop
Desktop 84%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 36%
Jet ski

Motherboard: MSI Z97 GAMING 5 (MS-7917)

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 60% - Above average Total price: $648
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $160Nvidia RTX 4060 $290WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $388WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $79
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $353
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback