Asus UX370UAR

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 12%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 74%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 12%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (70th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 30 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 72.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics5.67% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive276% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
CPU throttled at 88% by Windows. Ensure maximum processor state is set to 100% via Settings > System > Power & sleep > Additional power settings > Change plan settings > Change advanced power settings > Processor power management > Maximum processor state.
SystemAsus UX370UAR  (all builds)
MotherboardASUSTeK UX370UAR
Memory3.7 GB free of 8 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20170907
Uptime0.9 Days
Run DateSep 01 '18 at 23:25
Run Duration215 Seconds
Run User AUS-User
Background CPU4%
CPU Throttled 88%

 PC Performing above expectations (70th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-8250U
U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 1.8 GHz, turbo 2.9 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (98th percentile)
72.9% Very good
Memory 78.3
1-Core 108
2-Core 213
75% 133 Pts
4-Core 370
8-Core 491
55% 431 Pts
64-Core 314
20% 314 Pts
Poor: 26%
This bench: 72.9%
Great: 71%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel UHD Graphics 620 (Mobile Kaby Lake R)
Asus(1043 1DC0) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 22.20.16.4771
Performing way above expectations (92nd percentile)
5.67% Terrible
Lighting 6.93
Reflection 7.04
Parallax 4.5
6% 6.16 fps
MRender 6.62
Gravity 4.3
Splatting 9.13
6% 6.68 fps
Poor: 3%
This bench: 5.67%
Great: 6%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
WD Black NVMe PCIe M.2 1TB (2018)-$74
676GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 101110WD Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1625 1384 1386 1306 1294 1519 MB/s
Performing above expectations (61st percentile)
276% Outstanding
Read 1,740
Write 1237
Mixed 1,238
SusWrite 1419
316% 1,408 MB/s
4K Read 45.2
4K Write 147
4K Mixed 67.7
233% 86.7 MB/s
DQ Read 1,148
DQ Write 977
DQ Mixed 1,044
787% 1,056 MB/s
Poor: 182%
This bench: 276%
Great: 335%
Samsung Portable SSD T5 500GB
369GB free
Firmware: 0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 369 353 349 355 368 368 MB/s
Performing below expectations (29th percentile)
68.9% Good
Read 316
Write 325
Mixed 305
SusWrite 360
74% 327 MB/s
4K Read 23.2
4K Write 36.7
4K Mixed 25.4
87% 28.4 MB/s
DQ Read 164
DQ Write 161
DQ Mixed 173
127% 166 MB/s
Poor: 51%
This bench: 68.9%
Great: 97%
Jmicron Generic DISK00 2TB
2TB free
Firmware: 0103
SusWrite @10s intervals: 62 69 73 73 72 71 MB/s
Performing above expectations (66th percentile)
60.8% Good
Read 142
Write 115
Mixed 69.8
SusWrite 70
73% 99.1 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 2.2
4K Mixed 0.9
170% 1.27 MB/s
Poor: 12%
This bench: 60.8%
Great: 92%
Jmicron Generic DISK01 5TB
4.5TB free
Firmware: 0103
SusWrite @10s intervals: 62 69 73 73 72 71 MB/s
Performing as expected (43rd percentile)
47.6% Average
Read 94.4
Write 70.3
Mixed 29.5
SusWrite 70
48% 66.1 MB/s
4K Read 0.9
4K Write 5.5
4K Mixed 0.5
195% 2.3 MB/s
Poor: 6%
This bench: 47.6%
Great: 64%
Jmicron Generic DISK02 8TB
2TB free
Firmware: 0103
SusWrite @10s intervals: 62 69 72 73 72 72 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (91st percentile)
62.6% Good
Read 148
Write 167
Mixed 70.1
SusWrite 70.2
83% 114 MB/s
4K Read 1.1
4K Write 1.2
4K Mixed 1
179% 1.1 MB/s
Poor: 15%
This bench: 62.6%
Great: 63%
Generic Flash Disk 64GB
20GB free, PID 6387
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 6.6 7.9 7.6 7.8 7.6 7.8 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - benchmarks incomplete
Read 2.3
Write 2.2
Mixed 4.2
SusWrite 7.5
6% 4.05 MB/s
4K Read 1.6
4K Mixed 0
9% 0.8 MB/s
Poor: 4% Great: 30%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung K4E6E304EB-EGCG 2x4GB
2 of 2 slots used
8GB Row of chips LPDDR3 clocked @ 2133 MHz
Performing above expectations (77th percentile)
68% Good
MC Read 25
MC Write 27
MC Mixed 21.8
70% 24.6 GB/s
SC Read 11.6
SC Write 26.5
SC Mixed 18.8
54% 19 GB/s
Latency 83.8
48% 83.8 ns
Poor: 46%
This bench: 68%
Great: 71%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical UX370UAR Builds (Compare 130 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 10%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 57%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 10%
Tree trunk

System: Asus UX370UAR

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $166Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $388WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback