Performance Results


Gaming 13% Tree trunk	Desktop 67% Battle cruiser	Workstation 12% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (24th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 76 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 65.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics	8.7% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive	152% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory	32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Sub-optimal background CPU (16%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

PC Performing below expectations (24^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i7-6700HQ 320,434 User benchmarks, average bench 59% U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads Base clock 2.6 GHz, turbo 3.15 GHz (avg) Performing above expectations (76^th percentile)	65.3% Good	Memory 71.7 1-Core 93.7 2-Core 176 65% 114 Pts	4-Core 318 8-Core 537 52% 427 Pts	64-Core 528 33% 528 Pts
Poor: 34% ↑ This bench: 65.3% Great: 69%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia Quadro M3000M 1,726 User benchmarks, average bench 27% HP(103C 80D6) ≥ 4GB Driver: nvldumdx.dll Ver. 24.21.13.9764 Relative performance (0^th percentile) - GPU OC Guide	8.7% Terrible	Lighting 9.73 Reflection 9.04 Parallax 8.88 8% 9.22 fps	MRender 11.7 Gravity 7.97 Splatting 16.2 10% 12 fps
Poor: 22% ↑ This bench: 8.7% Great: 28%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung 960 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 1TB-$150 38,097 User benchmarks, average bench 241% 101GB free (System drive) Firmware: 2B7QCXE7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s SusWrite @10s intervals: 853 914 563 255 235 231 MB/s Performing way below expectations (4^th percentile)	152% Outstanding	Read 1,528 Write 1,162 Mixed 734 SusWrite 508 219% 983 MB/s	4K Read 30 4K Write 55.5 4K Mixed 35.9 121% 40.5 MB/s	DQ Read 414 DQ Write 603 DQ Mixed 494 378% 504 MB/s
Poor: 157% ↑ This bench: 152% Great: 302%
Samsung 850 Evo 500GB-$94 695,664 User benchmarks, average bench 112% 187GB free Firmware: EMT02B6Q SusWrite @10s intervals: 335 366 370 392 395 393 MB/s Performing way below expectations (15^th percentile)	93.6% Outstanding	Read 429 Write 361 Mixed 349 SusWrite 375 85% 379 MB/s	4K Read 29.9 4K Write 58.2 4K Mixed 38.3 125% 42.1 MB/s	DQ Read 354 DQ Write 294 DQ Mixed 319 240% 322 MB/s
Poor: 80% ↑ This bench: 93.6% Great: 134%
Samsung 850 Pro 1TB-$210 25,365 User benchmarks, average bench 105% 374GB free Firmware: EXM03B6Q SusWrite @10s intervals: 334 365 371 394 395 396 MB/s Performing way below expectations (18^th percentile)	90.3% Outstanding	Read 458 Write 342 Mixed 337 SusWrite 376 85% 378 MB/s	4K Read 25.1 4K Write 56.6 4K Mixed 33.5 111% 38.4 MB/s	DQ Read 353 DQ Write 295 DQ Mixed 315 239% 321 MB/s
Poor: 77% ↑ This bench: 90.3% Great: 124%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Kingston 9905668-002.A00G 4x8GB 22 User benchmarks, average bench 72% 4 of 4 slots used 32GB SODIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz Performing below potential (9^th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP	69.3% Good	MC Read 25.3 MC Write 27.4 MC Mixed 22.7 72% 25.1 GB/s	SC Read 13.8 SC Write 25.5 SC Mixed 21.1 58% 20.1 GB/s	Latency 97.6 41% 97.6 ns
Poor: 69% ↑ This bench: 69.3% Great: 76%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 11%

Tree trunk

Desktop 62%

Destroyer

Workstation 11%

Tree trunk

GPU
HD 530 (Mobile Skylake)IntelBench 5%, 213,495 samples	635x
Quadro M3000MNvidiaBench 27%, 1,726 samples	287x
Quadro M4000MNvidiaBench 34%, 731 samples	97x

SSD
SM961 NVMe PCIe M.2 512GBSamsungBench 238%, 21,542 samples	73x
MTFDDAV512TBN-1AR15ABHA 512GBCrucialBench 78%, 710 samples	58x
THNSN5256GPU7 NVMe PCIe M.2 256GBToshibaBench 148%, 19,151 samples	53x

RAM
HMA81GS6AFR8N-UH 2x8GBHynixBench 70%, 71,691 samples	76x
M471A1K43CB1-CRC 2x8GBSamsungBench 70%, 62,266 samples	72x
M471A2K43CB1-CRC 1x16GBSamsungBench 40%, 36,753 samples	43x

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $37	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $79	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16