HP Compaq Elite 8300 SFF

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (64th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 36 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 71.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics5.32% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Memory4GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 4GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (19%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
5 years ago, 5 years ago.
SystemHP Compaq Elite 8300 SFF  (all builds)
MotherboardHewlett-Packard 3397
Memory1.3 GB free of 4 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1366 x 768 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20120507
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateAug 23 '18 at 11:56
Run Duration249 Seconds
Run User AUS-User
Background CPU 19%

 PC Performing above expectations (64th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-3570
SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.4 GHz, turbo 3.6 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (90th percentile)
71.5% Very good
Memory 90.5
1-Core 99.9
2-Core 201
76% 131 Pts
4-Core 297
8-Core 353
42% 325 Pts
64-Core 372
23% 372 Pts
Poor: 50%
This bench: 71.5%
Great: 75%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GeForce GT 730
Gigabyte(1458 3666) 2GB
CLim: 901 MHz, MLim: 450 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 388.13
Performing as expected (59th percentile)
5.32% Terrible
Lighting 6.57
Reflection 7.12
Parallax 7.97
5% 7.22 fps
MRender 4.52
Gravity 7.2
Splatting 7.09
5% 6.27 fps
Poor: 3%
This bench: 5.32%
Great: 7%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 840 Pro 128GB-$150
51GB free (System drive)
Firmware: DXM06B0Q
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 3,728
Write 3,661
Mixed 3,629
821% 3,673 MB/s
4K Read 302
4K Write 208
4K Mixed 108
706% 206 MB/s
DQ Read 214
DQ Write 810
DQ Mixed 250
268% 425 MB/s
Poor: 62% Great: 110%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.11 500GB-$80
138GB free
Firmware: SD15
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 77.6
Write 76.5
Mixed 41.6
48% 65.2 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 1.5
4K Mixed 0.7
139% 1 MB/s
Poor: 27% Great: 59%
General USB Flash Disk 4GB
0GB free, PID 800c
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
Read 13.7
Write 1.7
Mixed 2.5
5% 5.97 MB/s
4K Read 4.5
4K Write 0
4K Mixed 0
17% 1.5 MB/s
SanDisk Ultra 123GB
64GB free, PID 558a
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 30.9
Write 16.4
Mixed 17.2
25% 21.5 MB/s
4K Read 4.1
4K Write 1.7
4K Mixed 1.4
121% 2.4 MB/s
Poor: 8% Great: 33%
Generic USB SD Reader 32GB
24GB free, PID 6362
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 4.2
Write 3
Mixed 4.2
5% 3.8 MB/s
4K Read 2.2
4K Write 0
4K Mixed 0
8% 0.73 MB/s
Poor: 2% Great: 17%
Generic USB CF Reader 1GB
0GB free, PID 6362
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 2.5
Write 2.5
Mixed 2.5
3% 2.5 MB/s
4K Read 1.6
4K Write 0.1
4K Mixed 0.1
13% 0.6 MB/s
Poor: 1% Great: 6%
Generic USB MS Reader 2GB
2GB free, PID 6362
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1.1 1.1 1.1 1 1.1 1.1 MB/s
Performing below expectations (22nd percentile)
1.51% Terrible
Read 5.2
Write 1.2
Mixed 2.2
SusWrite 1.1
3% 2.42 MB/s
4K Read 2.2
4K Write 0
4K Mixed 0
8% 0.73 MB/s
Poor: 2%
This bench: 1.51%
Great: 5%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M378B5773CH0-CK0 2x2GB
2 of 4 slots used
4GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz
Performing way above expectations (87th percentile)
55.9% Above average
MC Read 22.4
MC Write 20.5
MC Mixed 17.5
58% 20.1 GB/s
SC Read 9.8
SC Write 17.3
SC Mixed 10.9
36% 12.7 GB/s
Latency 66.5
60% 66.5 ns
Poor: 32%
This bench: 55.9%
Great: 58%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Compaq Elite 8300 SFF Builds (Compare 5,421 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 6%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 59%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 6%
Tree trunk

System: HP Compaq Elite 8300 SFF

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 72% - Very good Total price: $87
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $128Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $165Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $29
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $39SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $32Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback