Medion Erazer X7842 MD99690

Performance Results


Gaming 12% Tree trunk	Desktop 72% Battleship	Workstation 11% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing above expectations (76th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 24 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 78.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics	6.61% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive	40.8% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory	8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

High background CPU (25%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

System	Medion Erazer X7842 MD99690 (all builds)
Motherboard	MEDION P670RE1M
Memory	5.3 GB free of 8 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colori,
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20151105
Uptime	0.3 Days
Run Date	Apr 20 '16 at 15:57
Run Duration	183 Seconds
Run User	CHE-User
Background CPU	25%

PC Performing above expectations (76^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i7-6700HQ 320,434 User benchmarks, average bench 59% U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads Base clock 2.6 GHz, turbo 3.15 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (100^th percentile)	78.9% Very good	Memory 87.3 1-Core 102 2-Core 189 74% 126 Pts	4-Core 382 8-Core 544 58% 463 Pts	64-Core 548 34% 548 Pts
Poor: 34% ↑ This bench: 78.9% Great: 69%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Intel HD 530 (Mobile Skylake) FAQ - How to force Optimus or Switchable discrete GPUs? Clevo(1558 6540) 1GB Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 20.19.15.4331 Performing way above expectations (100^th percentile)	6.61% Terrible	Lighting 6.97 Reflection 10.2 Parallax 6.94 6% 8.02 fps	MRender 8.81 Gravity 6.17 Splatting 14.2 8% 9.73 fps
Poor: 3% ↑ This bench: 6.61% Great: 6%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung MZNLF128HCHP-00000 128GB 6,038 User benchmarks, average bench 47% 56GB free (System drive) Firmware: FXT2101Q Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing below expectations (22^nd percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (09) Power-on hours count 99 99 33 (0C) Power cycle count 99 99 61 (AA) Unknown 100 100 0 (AB) Unknown 100 100 0 (AC) Unknown 100 100 0 (AD) Unknown 99 99 1 (AE) Unknown 100 100 0 (B2) Unknown 100 100 0 (B4) Unknown 100 100 1064 (B8) Unknown 100 100 0 (BB) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (C2) HDA temperature 59 53 41 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 100 100 0 (E9) Unknown 99 99 16768826 (F1) Unknown 99 99 159 (F2) Unknown 99 99 180 (F9) Unknown 99 99 159	40.8% Average	Read 480 Write 59.2 Mixed 87.1 44% 209 MB/s	4K Read 14.8 4K Write 29 4K Mixed 8.21 48% 17.3 MB/s	DQ Read 154 DQ Write 18.9 DQ Mixed 7.51 26% 60.2 MB/s
Poor: 35% ↑ This bench: 40.8% Great: 59%
HGST Travelstar 5K1000 2.5" 1TB 129,581 User benchmarks, average bench 43% 575GB free Firmware: JA0OA560 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing as expected (57^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 100 100 0 (02) Throughput performance 100 100 0 (03) Spinup time 176 176 73014444033 (04) Start/Stop count 100 100 1260 (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (07) Seek error rate 100 100 0 (08) Seek timer performance 100 100 0 (09) Power-on hours count 98 98 908 (0A) Spinup retry count 100 100 0 (0C) Power cycle count 100 100 997 (BF) G-sense error rate 100 100 0 (C0) Power-off retract count 100 100 22 (C1) Load/Unload cycle count 95 95 52409 (C2) HDA temperature 214 214 193274314780 (C4) Reallocation count 100 100 0 (C5) Current pending sector count 100 100 0 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 100 100 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 200 200 0 (DF) Load/unload retry count 100 100 0	45.9% Average	Read 83.8 Write 76.1 Mixed 80 60% 80 MB/s	4K Read 0.53 4K Write 1.49 4K Mixed 0.19 70% 0.73 MB/s
Poor: 20% ↑ This bench: 45.9% Great: 57%
Intenso Ultra Line 64GB 251 User benchmarks, average bench 16% 17GB free, PID 0917 Operating at USB 3.0 Speed Performing way above expectations (96^th percentile)	28.4% Poor	Read 116 Write 45.9 Mixed 54.6 79% 72 MB/s	4K Read 4.26 4K Write 0.19 4K Mixed 0.15 27% 1.53 MB/s
Poor: 9% ↑ This bench: 28.4% Great: 28%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Micron 8ATF51264HZ-2G1A2 2x4GB 721 User benchmarks, average bench 67% 2 of 4 slots used 8GB SODIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz Performing above expectations (83^rd percentile)	71.7% Very good	MC Read 27.4 MC Write 27.9 MC Mixed 20.9 73% 25.4 GB/s	SC Read 16.5 SC Write 27.4 SC Mixed 20.5 61% 21.5 GB/s	Latency 70.2 57% 70.2 ns
Poor: 49% ↑ This bench: 71.7% Great: 74%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical Erazer X7842 MD99690 Builds (Compare 11 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 10%

Tree trunk

Desktop 66%

Battle cruiser

Workstation 9%

Tree trunk

System: Medion Erazer X7842 MD99690

CPU
Core i7-6700HQIntelBench 59%, 320,434 samples	11x

GPU
GTX 970MNvidiaBench 31%, 21,995 samples	7x
HD 530 (Mobile Skylake)IntelBench 5%, 213,495 samples	4x

SSD
MZNLF128HCHP-00000 128GBSamsungBench 47%, 6,038 samples	5x
MZNLN256HCHP-00000 256GBSamsungBench 79%, 3,145 samples	2x
Blue SN570 NVMe PCIe M.2 500GBWDBench 217%, 23,579 samples	2x

RAM
HMA451S6AFR8N-TF 1x4GBHynixBench 36%, 9,725 samples	5x
HyperX DDR4 2133 C13 2x8GBKingstonBench 77%, 2,917 samples	3x
HMA41GS6AFR8N-TF 2x8GBHynixBench 70%, 55,289 samples	1x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $269	Nvidia RTX 4060 $295	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $177	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16