Packard ixtreme M5741

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 6%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 64%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 5%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (66th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 34 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 70.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics3.6% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive61.4% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
SystemPackard ixtreme M5741  (all builds)
MotherboardPackard H57M01
Memory5.4 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1680 x 1050 - 32 Bit kleuren
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20100323
Uptime3.1 Days
Run DateAug 07 '18 at 09:12
Run Duration174 Seconds
Run User NLD-User
Background CPU8%

 PC Performing above expectations (66th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7 860-$320
CPU 1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 2.8 GHz, turbo 3 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (92nd percentile)
70.2% Very good
Memory 91.6
1-Core 85.6
2-Core 160
68% 112 Pts
4-Core 267
8-Core 371
40% 319 Pts
64-Core 372
23% 372 Pts
Poor: 53%
This bench: 70.2%
Great: 72%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GeForce GT 320
Sapphire(174B 2150) 1GB
Ram: 1GB, Driver: 342.1
Performing above expectations (84th percentile)
3.6% Terrible
Lighting 4.53
Reflection 6.42
Parallax 1.91
4% 4.29 fps
MRender 6.14
Gravity 3.2
Splatting 3.57
3% 4.3 fps
Poor: 3%
This bench: 3.6%
Great: 4%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 850 Evo 250GB-$100
186GB free (System drive)
Firmware: EMT02B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 228 226 225 224 229 228 MB/s
Performing below potential (3rd percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
61.4% Good
Read 241
Write 228
Mixed 214
SusWrite 227
51% 228 MB/s
4K Read 20
4K Write 54.7
4K Mixed 26.9
94% 33.9 MB/s
DQ Read 204
DQ Write 192
DQ Mixed 197
148% 197 MB/s
Poor: 72%
This bench: 61.4%
Great: 124%
WD Green 1TB (2009)-$72
219GB free
Firmware: 01.00A01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 110 109 112 112 112 113 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
63.7% Good
Read 111
Write 108
Mixed 66
SusWrite 111
73% 98.9 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 1.7
4K Mixed 0.6
119% 0.93 MB/s
Poor: 23%
This bench: 63.7%
Great: 57%
WDC WD50 00AAJS-00YFA0 500GB
16GB free, PID 0b09
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 24 25 25 25 25 25 MB/s
Performing as expected (50th percentile)
16.3% Very poor
Read 30
Write 21.3
Mixed 21.8
SusWrite 24.6
32% 24.4 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 2.1
4K Mixed 0.9
104% 1.2 MB/s
Poor: 15%
This bench: 16.3%
Great: 22%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Toshiba ACR256X64D3U1333C9 ACR256X64D3U1333C9 99U5474-028.A00LF 8GB
1333, 1333, 1333 MHz
2048, 2048, 4096 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
32.6% Below average
MC Read 12.3
MC Write 9.7
MC Mixed 8.5
29% 10.2 GB/s
SC Read 10.4
SC Write 10.4
SC Mixed 11
30% 10.6 GB/s
Latency 64.8
62% 64.8 ns
Poor: 25%
This bench: 32.6%
Great: 33%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical ixtreme M5741 Builds (Compare 38 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 6%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 58%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 6%
Tree trunk

System: Packard ixtreme M5741

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 89% - Excellent Total price: $72
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $164Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $149
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $245Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $359
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback