TEST
YOUR PC
ADD TO PC
BUILD

Asus STRIKER II FORMULA

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
Save results Copy results User guide
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (73rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 27 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 66.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Boot Drive63% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory4GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 4GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago. (Only the first run influences device rankings)
MotherboardAsus STRIKER II FORMULA  (all builds)
Memory2.7 GB free of 4 GB @ 0.9 GHz
Display2560 x 1600 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20100319
Uptime0 Days
Run DateAug 06 '18 at 04:40
Run Duration126 Seconds
Run User GBR-User
Background CPU0%

 PC Performing above expectations (73rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Xeon X5460-$190
Socket 775, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 4.05 GHz, turbo 3.8 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
66.5% Good
Memory 93.8
1-Core 56.2
2-Core 112
57% 87.2 Pts
4-Core 230
8-Core 229
31% 229 Pts
64-Core 229
14% 229 Pts
Poor: 40% ↑
This bench: 66.5%
 Great: 60%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD R9 280X-$500
Asus(1043 0418) 3GB
CLim: 1255 MHz, MLim: 1685 MHz, Ram: 3GB, Driver: 17.1.1
Relative performance n/a - benchmarks incomplete
Lighting 61
Reflection 39.7
Parallax 76.6
50% 59.1 fps
Splatting 47.6
49% 47.6 fps
Poor: 31% Great: 39%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 860 EVO 250GB
158GB free (System drive)
Firmware: RVT0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 191 188 203 202 204 202 MB/s
Performing below potential (29th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
63% Good
Read 250
Write 204
Mixed 210
SusWrite 198
48% 216 MB/s
4K Read 29.4
4K Write 53.2
4K Mixed 37.5
121% 40 MB/s
DQ Read 41.5
DQ Write 92.7
DQ Mixed 51.4
44% 61.9 MB/s
Poor: 51% ↑
This bench: 63%
 Great: 89%
ST332062 0AS 320GB
21GB free, PID 6208
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 31 32 32 32 32 32 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
17% Very poor
Read 28
Write 32.6
Mixed 23.3
SusWrite 32
40% 29 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 1.9
4K Mixed 0.7
91% 1.07 MB/s
Poor: 17% ↑
This bench: 17%
 Great: 17%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 4x1GB
4 of 4 slots used
4GB DIMM DDR2
Performing way above expectations (90th percentile)
23.8% Poor
MC Read 6.4
MC Write 8.3
MC Mixed 5.7
19% 6.8 GB/s
SC Read 8.5
SC Write 7.5
SC Mixed 6.2
21% 7.4 GB/s
Latency 60.4
66% 60.4 ns
Poor: 11% ↑
This bench: 23.8%
 Great: 28%
Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU GPU SSD HDD RAM MBD
Typical STRIKER II FORMULA Builds (Compare 22 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 12%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 58%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 9%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: Asus STRIKER II FORMULA

CPU
Core2 Extreme X9650Intel  $850Bench 53%, 3,122 samples6x
Core2 Quad Q9650Intel  $170Bench 51%, 16,719 samples4x
Xeon X5460Intel  $190Bench 52%, 10,360 samples3x
GPU
GTX 750-TiNvidia  $92Bench 17%, 309,423 samples6x
GeForce GT 710NvidiaBench 3%, 187,161 samples3x
GTX 670Nvidia  $435Bench 28%, 47,610 samples2x
SSD
0 240GBCt240bx5Bench 50%, 1,468 samples2x
870 EVO 500GBSamsungBench 69%, 18 samples2x
SSDNow V300 120GBKingston  $36Bench 54%, 339,020 samples1x
RAM
4x2GBUnknownBench 25%, 183,252 samples13x
4x1GBUnknownBench 18%, 54,972 samples3x
2x2GBUnknownBench 20%, 446,702 samples2x
EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 39% - Below average Total price: $942
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $160Nvidia RTX 4060 $290WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $388WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $79
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $363
Today's hottest
Amazon Ebay
deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
Build Test EFps
Can You Run It?
►
YouTube
*NEW*
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback