Asus P7P55D-E PREMIUM

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 20%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 80%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 16%
Surfboard
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (42nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 58 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 75.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics20.7% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive40.3% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 8.1 is a recent version of Windows, it's worth upgrading to Windows 10 which has had several improvements made to the user interface including a better homescreen.
MotherboardAsus P7P55D-E PREMIUM  (all builds)
Memory28.7 GB free of 32 GB @ 1.1 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit Farben
OSWindows 8.1
BIOS Date20121003
Uptime0 Days
Run DateApr 17 '16 at 14:53
Run Duration458 Seconds
Run User DEU-User
Background CPU4%

 PC Performing as expected (42nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7 860-$320
LGA1156, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.65 GHz, turbo 3.65 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (99th percentile)
75.5% Very good
Memory 95.7
1-Core 92.3
2-Core 182
73% 123 Pts
4-Core 300
8-Core 456
47% 378 Pts
64-Core 452
28% 452 Pts
Poor: 53%
This bench: 75.5%
Great: 72%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 570-$350
Asus(1043 8387) 1.2GB
Driver: nvd3dumx.dll Ver. 10.18.13.5891
Performing way above expectations (92nd percentile)
20.7% Poor
Lighting 24.7
Reflection 37.7
Parallax 27.8
20% 30.1 fps
MRender 34
Gravity 20.1
Splatting 26.2
22% 26.8 fps
Poor: 18%
This bench: 20.7%
Great: 22%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Kingston SSDNow V300 240GB-$35
97GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 521ABBF0 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (5th percentile)
40.3% Average
Read 164
Write 117
Mixed 113
29% 131 MB/s
4K Read 19.3
4K Write 50.4
4K Mixed 15.3
76% 28.3 MB/s
DQ Read 93.8
DQ Write 92.8
DQ Mixed 39.1
44% 75.2 MB/s
Poor: 41%
This bench: 40.3%
Great: 85%
Seagate ST32000641AS 2TB-$159
716GB free
Firmware: CC13 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing as expected (44th percentile)
58.6% Above average
Read 98.9
Write 106
Mixed 97.8
76% 101 MB/s
4K Read 0.38
4K Write 1.03
4K Mixed 0.41
80% 0.61 MB/s
Poor: 38%
This bench: 58.6%
Great: 73%
WD Green 2TB (2011)-$60
136GB free
Firmware: 51.0AB51 Max speed: SATA 2.0 300 MB/s
Performing as expected (59th percentile)
54.3% Above average
Read 106
Write 83.7
Mixed 82.2
68% 90.6 MB/s
4K Read 0.63
4K Write 0.38
4K Mixed 0.18
53% 0.39 MB/s
Poor: 31%
This bench: 54.3%
Great: 67%
Seagate ST32000641AS 2TB-$159
67GB free
Firmware: CC13 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing as expected (44th percentile)
59.1% Above average
Read 112
Write 94.3
Mixed 106
78% 104 MB/s
4K Read 0.46
4K Write 1.07
4K Mixed 0.37
80% 0.63 MB/s
Poor: 38%
This bench: 59.1%
Great: 73%
Seagate STM31000528AS 1TB
59GB free
Firmware: CC35 Max speed: SATA 2.0 300 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (11th percentile)
38.7% Below average
Read 70.3
Write 64.3
Mixed 80.5
54% 71.7 MB/s
4K Read 0.58
4K Write 1.18
4K Mixed 0.45
96% 0.74 MB/s
Poor: 32%
This bench: 38.7%
Great: 68%
WD Elements 1.5TB
366GB free, PID 1021
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
Performing below expectations (27th percentile)
15.3% Very poor
Read 30.1
Write 25.2
Mixed 24.2
33% 26.5 MB/s
4K Read 0.47
4K Write 1.73
4K Mixed 0.17
66% 0.79 MB/s
Poor: 10%
This bench: 15.3%
Great: 22%
TOSHIBA MK1059GSM 1TB
51GB free, PID 0c31
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
Performing as expected (45th percentile)
15.1% Very poor
Read 30.2
Write 26.2
Mixed 14.7
29% 23.7 MB/s
4K Read 0.45
4K Write 1.6
4K Mixed 0.19
62% 0.74 MB/s
Poor: 10%
This bench: 15.1%
Great: 19%
TOSHIBA MK1059GSM 1TB
46GB free, PID 0c31
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
Performing as expected (45th percentile)
14.4% Very poor
Read 29.5
Write 24.2
Mixed 10
25% 21.2 MB/s
4K Read 0.41
4K Write 1.55
4K Mixed 0.19
61% 0.72 MB/s
Poor: 10%
This bench: 14.4%
Great: 19%
WD M002 External 500GB
36GB free, PID 1003
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
Performing way below expectations (17th percentile)
13% Very poor
Read 30
Write 25.7
Mixed 14.2
28% 23.3 MB/s
4K Read 0.44
4K Write 0.95
4K Mixed 0.49
51% 0.63 MB/s
Poor: 13%
This bench: 13%
Great: 18%
TOSHIBA MK1059GSM 1TB
32GB free, PID 022e
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
Performing way below expectations (5th percentile)
11.3% Very poor
Read 29
Write 28.1
Mixed 7.65
26% 21.6 MB/s
4K Read 0.32
4K Write 0.3
4K Mixed 0.15
17% 0.26 MB/s
Poor: 12%
This bench: 11.3%
Great: 36%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 32GB
1066, 1066, 1066, 1066 MHz
8192, 8192, 8192, 8192 MB
Performing as expected (59th percentile)
48% Average
MC Read 17
MC Write 16.2
MC Mixed 14.4
45% 15.9 GB/s
SC Read 13.1
SC Write 13.9
SC Mixed 16
41% 14.3 GB/s
Latency 55.1
73% 55.1 ns
Poor: 27%
This bench: 48%
Great: 101%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical P7P55D-E PREMIUM Builds (Compare 24 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 20%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 72%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 16%
Surfboard

Motherboard: Asus P7P55D-E PREMIUM

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 46% - Average Total price: $615
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $163Nvidia RTX 4060 $290WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $160
Intel Core i5-13600K $249Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $79
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $383
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback