HP Presario CQ57 Notebook PC

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 3%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 40%
Jet ski
Workstation
Workstation 3%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (44th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 56 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 40%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is poor.
Graphics0.97% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive46.2% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory6GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 6GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 11 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.
SystemHP Presario CQ57 Notebook PC  (all builds)
MotherboardHewlett-Packard 3672
Memory4.2 GB free of 6 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1366 x 768 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 7
BIOS Date20111218
Uptime0 Days
Run DateAug 04 '18 at 03:15
Run Duration140 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU10%

 PC Performing as expected (44th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Celeron B800
CPU1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 2 threads
Base clock 1.5 GHz
Performing as expected (40th percentile)
40% Below average
Memory 68.5
1-Core 37.7
2-Core 69.6
39% 58.6 Pts
4-Core 69.4
8-Core 70.3
9% 69.9 Pts
64-Core 68.6
4% 68.6 Pts
Poor: 25%
This bench: 40%
Great: 47%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel HD Graphics (G2 Pentium/Celeron 1.1/1.15 GHz)
HP(103C 3672) 2.8GB
Driver: igdumd64.dll Ver. 8.15.10.2430
Performing as expected (59th percentile)
0.97% Terrible
Lighting 0.97
Reflection 1.35
Parallax 0.88
1% 1.06 fps
MRender 1.52
Gravity 1.43
Splatting 1.83
1% 1.59 fps
Poor: 0%
This bench: 0.97%
Great: 1%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
SSD 120GB
68GB free (System drive)
Firmware: SBFMB1.1
SusWrite @10s intervals: 161 156 132 125 133 133 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (14th percentile)
46.2% Average
Read 353
Write 153
Mixed 176
SusWrite 140
46% 206 MB/s
4K Read 19
4K Write 28.4
4K Mixed 17.6
66% 21.7 MB/s
DQ Read 48.8
DQ Write 94.4
DQ Mixed 76.6
57% 73.3 MB/s
Poor: 37%
This bench: 46.2%
Great: 94%
Hitachi HTS543232A7A384 320GB
44GB free, PID 2338
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 26 25 26 25 24 24 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (17th percentile)
10.3% Very poor
Read 11.5
Write 23.5
Mixed 4
SusWrite 25
23% 16 MB/s
4K Read 0.4
4K Write 1
4K Mixed 0.5
52% 0.63 MB/s
Poor: 10%
This bench: 10.3%
Great: 18%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M471B5673FH0-CH9 Kingston HP536726-H41-ELCUW 6GB
1333, 1333 MHz
2048, 4096 MB
Performing way above expectations (88th percentile)
35.8% Below average
MC Read 12.3
MC Write 12.8
MC Mixed 13.9
37% 13 GB/s
SC Read 6.9
SC Write 7.5
SC Mixed 8.8
22% 7.73 GB/s
Latency 105
38% 105 ns
Poor: 23%
This bench: 35.8%
Great: 47%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Presario CQ57 Notebook PC Builds (Compare 185 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 2%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 24%
Surfboard
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk

System: HP Presario CQ57 Notebook PC

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 27% - Poor Total price: $148
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $160Nvidia RTX 4060 $290WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $388WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $79
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $363
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback