Gigabyte AB350M-DS3H

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 8%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 31%
Sail boat
Workstation
Workstation 7%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (23rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 77 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith an extremely low single core score, this CPU can barely handle email and light web browsing. Finally, with a gaming score of 27.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very poor.
Graphics16.9% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (38%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemGigabyte AB350M-DS3H
MotherboardGigabyte AB350M-DS3H  (all builds)
Memory3.6 GB free of 8 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors, 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20180208
Uptime0 Days
Run DateAug 04 '18 at 02:30
Run Duration141 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU 38%

 PC Performing below expectations (23rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 3 2200G-$104
AM4, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.5 GHz, turbo 3.65 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (1st percentile)
27.8% Poor
Memory 13.3
1-Core 34.2
2-Core 74.3
21% 40.6 Pts
4-Core 241
8-Core 247
32% 244 Pts
64-Core 235
15% 235 Pts
Poor: 43%
This bench: 27.8%
Great: 72%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 560 Ti-$188
MSI(1462 2382) 1GB
CLim: 880 MHz, MLim: 1050 MHz, Ram: 1GB, Driver: 388.13
Performing above expectations (84th percentile)
16.9% Very poor
Lighting 19.9
Reflection 23.7
Parallax 6.06
16% 16.6 fps
MRender 26.5
Gravity 20.5
Splatting 20.3
18% 22.5 fps
Poor: 15%
This bench: 16.9%
Great: 18%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Hitachi Deskstar 7K1000.C 1TB-$70
900GB free (System drive)
Firmware: JP4OA3EA
SusWrite @10s intervals: 23 31 15 13 8.7 9.2 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (2nd percentile)
19% Very poor
Read 49.7
Write 12.6
Mixed 11
SusWrite 16.5
16% 22.5 MB/s
4K Read 0.1
4K Write 0.8
4K Mixed 0.5
74% 0.47 MB/s
Poor: 30%
This bench: 19%
Great: 74%
Kingston DataTraveler C10 32GB
30GB free, PID 1641
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 7.6 7.4 7.8 7.9 7.9 8 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (18th percentile)
5.04% Terrible
Read 18.8
Write 11.2
Mixed 7
SusWrite 7.7
14% 11.2 MB/s
4K Read 2.7
4K Write 0
4K Mixed 0
10% 0.9 MB/s
Poor: 5%
This bench: 5.04%
Great: 7%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 3000 C16 Series 2x4GB
2 of 4 slots used
8GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz
Performing way below expectations (11th percentile)
65% Good
MC Read 26.6
MC Write 28.9
MC Mixed 25.7
77% 27.1 GB/s
SC Read 5.8
SC Write 8.8
SC Mixed 5.9
20% 6.83 GB/s
Latency 374
11% 374 ns
Poor: 54%
This bench: 65%
Great: 106%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical GA-AB350M-DS3H-CF Builds (Compare 648 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 44%
Speed boat
Desktop
Desktop 79%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 41%
Speed boat

Motherboard: Gigabyte AB350M-DS3H - $70

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 96% - Outstanding Total price: $406
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $154Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $388WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $90
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $353
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback