Asrock 980DE3/U3S3 R2.0

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (79th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 21 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 61.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics1.58% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
MotherboardAsrock 980DE3/U3S3 R2.0  (all builds)
Memory12.5 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit Farben
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20140918
Uptime0 Days
Run DateAug 02 '18 at 17:37
Run Duration136 Seconds
Run User DEU-User
Background CPU1%

 PC Performing above expectations (79th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD FX-8320-$125
CPUSocket, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.5 GHz, turbo 3.6 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (85th percentile)
61.8% Good
Memory 84.8
1-Core 68.7
2-Core 119
57% 90.7 Pts
4-Core 211
8-Core 372
35% 292 Pts
64-Core 376
23% 376 Pts
Poor: 47%
This bench: 61.8%
Great: 65%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD Radeon R5 200
PwrHis(1787 3000) 1GB
Driver: aticfx64.dll Ver. 15.301.1201.0
Performing as expected (51st percentile)
1.58% Terrible
Lighting 2.1
Reflection 2.12
Parallax 2
2% 2.07 fps
MRender 1.62
Gravity 1.57
Splatting 1.65
1% 1.61 fps
Poor: 2%
This bench: 1.58%
Great: 2%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 1TB-$28
312GB free (System drive)
Firmware: CC43
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 184
Write 191
Mixed 77.7
111% 151 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 1.7
4K Mixed 0.8
154% 1.1 MB/s
Poor: 55% Great: 112%
Hitachi HUA721010KLA330 1TB-$38
263GB free
Firmware: GKAOAB0A
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 2,376
Write 37.2
Mixed 68.2
593% 827 MB/s
4K Read 287
4K Write 1.2
4K Mixed 2
12,215% 96.8 MB/s
Poor: 23% Great: 46%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown CT102464BA160B.C16 BLS4G3D1609DS1S00. BLS4G3D1609DS1S00. 16GB
1600, 1600, 1600 MHz
8192, 4096, 4096 MB
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
48.4% Average
MC Read 19.7
MC Write 15.3
MC Mixed 17.1
50% 17.4 GB/s
SC Read 10.7
SC Write 8.3
SC Mixed 13.4
31% 10.8 GB/s
Latency 72.1
56% 72.1 ns
Poor: 24%
This bench: 48.4%
Great: 48%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical 980DE3/U3S3 R2.0 Builds (Compare 65 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 20%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 67%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 16%
Surfboard

Motherboard: Asrock 980DE3/U3S3 R2.0

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 80% - Very good Total price: $217
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $169Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $249Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $369
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback