Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming 0% Incomplete	Desktop 0% Incomplete	Workstation 0% Incomplete


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing above expectations (79th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 21 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 61.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics	1.58% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

PC Performing above expectations (79^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
AMD FX-8320-$203 106,454 User benchmarks, average bench 59% CPUSocket, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads Base clock 3.5 GHz, turbo 3.6 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (85^th percentile)	61.8% Good	Memory 84.8 1-Core 68.7 2-Core 119 57% 90.7 Pts	4-Core 211 8-Core 372 35% 292 Pts	64-Core 376 23% 376 Pts
Poor: 47% ↑ This bench: 61.8% Great: 65%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
AMD Radeon R5 200 6,989 User benchmarks, average bench 2% PwrHis(1787 3000) 1GB Driver: aticfx64.dll Ver. 15.301.1201.0 Performing as expected (51^st percentile)	1.58% Terrible	Lighting 2.1 Reflection 2.12 Parallax 2 2% 2.07 fps	MRender 1.62 Gravity 1.57 Splatting 1.65 1% 1.61 fps
Poor: 2% ↑ This bench: 1.58% Great: 2%

Drives	Sequential	Random 4k
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 1TB-$24 1,562,409 User benchmarks, average bench 89% 312GB free (System drive) Firmware: CC43 Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete	Read 184 Write 191 Mixed 77.7 111% 151 MB/s	4K Read 0.8 4K Write 1.7 4K Mixed 0.8 154% 1.1 MB/s
Poor: 55% Great: 112%
Hitachi HUA721010KLA330 1TB-$38 10,651 User benchmarks, average bench 38% 263GB free Firmware: GKAOAB0A Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete	Read 2,376 Write 37.2 Mixed 68.2 593% 827 MB/s	4K Read 287 4K Write 1.2 4K Mixed 2 12,215% 96.8 MB/s
Poor: 23% Great: 46%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown CT102464BA160B.C16 BLS4G3D1609DS1S00. BLS4G3D1609DS1S00. 16GB 9 User benchmarks, average bench 39% 1600, 1600, 1600 MHz 8192, 4096, 4096 MB Performing way above expectations (100^th percentile)	48.4% Average	MC Read 19.7 MC Write 15.3 MC Mixed 17.1 50% 17.4 GB/s	SC Read 10.7 SC Write 8.3 SC Mixed 13.4 31% 10.8 GB/s	Latency 72.1 56% 72.1 ns
Poor: 24% ↑ This bench: 48.4% Great: 48%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 20%

Surfboard

Desktop 67%

Battle cruiser

Workstation 16%

Surfboard

SSD
A400 240GBKingston $28Bench 66%, 424,288 samples	7x
850 Pro 256GBSamsung $113Bench 102%, 141,929 samples	3x
SSDNow V300 120GBKingston $36Bench 54%, 339,020 samples	3x

RAM
99U5471-057.A00LF 1x8GBKingstonBench 27%, 466 samples	4x
Fury DDR3 1866 C10 2x8GBHyperXBench 59%, 122,541 samples	4x
HyperX DDR3 1866 C10 1x8GBKingstonBench 32%, 29,968 samples	3x

Value: 80% - Very good

Total price: $217