ADD TO PC
BUILD

Hitachi HA8000/RS220

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU
Gaming 0% Incomplete	Desktop 0% Incomplete	Workstation 0% Incomplete


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (25th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 75 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 53.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Boot Drive	61.1% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory	32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

System	Hitachi HA8000/RS220 (all builds)
Motherboard	Gigabyte 7TTSHEa
Memory	27.4 GB free of 32 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display	1024 x 768 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20110224
Uptime	1.1 Days
Run Date	Aug 01 '18 at 03:45
Run Duration	169 Seconds
Run User	USA-User
Background CPU	0%

PC Performing below expectations (25^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
1st CPU: Intel Xeon X5660 2,343 User benchmarks, average bench 66% CPU1, 2 CPU, 12 cores, 24 threads Base clock 2.8 GHz, turbo 2.65 GHz (avg) Performing way below expectations (6^th percentile)	53.6% Above average	Memory 66.4 1-Core 48.1 2-Core 140 49% 84.8 Pts	4-Core 220 8-Core 439 39% 329 Pts	64-Core 1,089 67% 1,089 Pts
Poor: 53% ↑ This bench: 53.6% Great: 74%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
LSI MR9266-8i 525GB 6 User benchmarks, average bench 75% 119GB free (System drive) Firmware: 3.15 SusWrite @10s intervals: 245 211 233 101 211 235 MB/s Performing way below expectations (8^th percentile)	61.1% Good	Read 294 Write 328 Mixed 203 SusWrite 206 58% 258 MB/s	4K Read 19.3 4K Write 58.8 4K Mixed 23.1 90% 33.7 MB/s	DQ Read 200 DQ Write 217 DQ Mixed 160 134% 192 MB/s
Poor: 61% ↑ This bench: 61.1% Great: 90%
Asmt ASM1352R-Fast 16TB 12 User benchmarks, average bench 48% 1TB free Firmware: 0 SusWrite @10s intervals: 165 164 168 166 163 162 MB/s Performing below expectations (25^th percentile)	33.3% Below average	Read 324 Write 245 Mixed 122 SusWrite 165 48% 214 MB/s	4K Read 14.3 4K Write 10.2 4K Mixed 3.1 31% 9.2 MB/s	DQ Read 60.5 DQ Write 10.8 DQ Mixed 3 11% 24.8 MB/s
Poor: 30% ↑ This bench: 33.3% Great: 64%
Asmt ASM1352R-PM 4TB 60 User benchmarks, average bench 61% 764GB free Firmware: 0 SusWrite @10s intervals: 61 64 58 61 63 64 MB/s Performing as expected (42^nd percentile)	58.6% Above average	Read 141 Write 155 Mixed 76.3 SusWrite 61.8 80% 108 MB/s	4K Read 0.5 4K Write 5.5 4K Mixed 1.4 278% 2.47 MB/s
Poor: 12% ↑ This bench: 58.6% Great: 119%
Asmt ASM1352R-PM 500GB 31 User benchmarks, average bench 45% 234GB free Firmware: 0 SusWrite @10s intervals: 61 62 63 62 64 64 MB/s Performing as expected (57^th percentile)	44.9% Average	Read 93.4 Write 71.7 Mixed 50.9 SusWrite 62.8 51% 69.7 MB/s	4K Read 0.8 4K Write 1.2 4K Mixed 0.9 156% 0.97 MB/s
Poor: 18% ↑ This bench: 44.9% Great: 63%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown 4x8GB 41,916 User benchmarks, average bench 70% 4 of 12 slots used 32GB DIMM DDR3 1333 MHz Performing way below expectations (10^th percentile)	39.2% Below average	MC Read 16.9 MC Write 13.9 MC Mixed 13.7 42% 14.8 GB/s	SC Read 6.6 SC Write 5 SC Mixed 7.7 18% 6.43 GB/s	Latency 110 36% 110 ns
Poor: 36% ↑ This bench: 39.2% Great: 115%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?

Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.

Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?

Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.

Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?

We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.

Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?

The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.

Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?

Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.

The Best

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $166	Nvidia RTX 4060 $293	WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-13600K $260	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $388	WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-12400F $110	Nvidia RTX 4070 $520	Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $406

Today's hottest

Amazon Ebay

deals

CPU GPU SSD HDD USB RAM MBD

If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission

Build

Test

EFps

Can You Run It?

►
YouTube
*NEW*

About • User Guide • FAQs • Email • Privacy • Developer • YouTube Feedback