Today's hottest deals

Razer Blade 16 - RZ09-0483

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 210%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 116%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 255%
UFO
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (59th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 41 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle intensive workstation, and even full-fledged server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 112%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is outstanding.
Graphics191% is a record breaking 3D score, it's almost off the scale. This GPU can handle all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive354% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
Very high background CPU (56%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
SystemRazer Blade 16 - RZ09-0483  (all builds)
MotherboardRazer SO690
Memory21.6 GB free of 32 GB
Display2560 x 1600 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20230919
Uptime3.1 Days
Run DateDec 02 '23 at 13:19
Run Duration192 Seconds
Run User QAT-User
Background CPU 56%

 PC Performing as expected (59th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i9-13950HX
U3E1, 1 CPU, 24 cores, 32 threads
Base clock 2.2 GHz, turbo 4.6 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (20th percentile)
112% Outstanding
Memory 79.7
1-Core 212
2-Core 419
122% 237 Pts
4-Core 772
8-Core 1,316
127% 1,044 Pts
64-Core 3,150
195% 3,150 Pts
Poor: 101%
This bench: 112%
Great: 121%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 4080 (Laptop)
Device(1A58 3006) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 3105 MHz, MLim: 4500 MHz, Ram: 12GB, Driver: 546.17
Performing below potential (48th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
191% Outstanding
Lighting 265
Reflection 285
Parallax 268
216% 273 fps
MRender 385
Gravity 223
Splatting 192
209% 267 fps
Poor: 133%
This bench: 191%
Great: 218%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung MZVL21T0HCLR-00B00 1TB
414GB free (System drive)
Firmware: GXA7801Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1828 1847 1851 1918 1947 2001 MB/s
Performing as expected (50th percentile)
354% Outstanding
Read 2,686
Write 2,150
Mixed 1,869
SusWrite 1,898
482% 2,151 MB/s
4K Read 64.1
4K Write 118
4K Mixed 64.9
243% 82.4 MB/s
DQ Read 1,500
DQ Write 1,061
DQ Mixed 1,173
905% 1,245 MB/s
Poor: 192%
This bench: 354%
Great: 444%
CT4000P3PSSD8 4TB
1.5TB free
Firmware: P9CR40A
SusWrite @10s intervals: 3981 3914 4032 3919 3717 3903 MB/s
Performing above expectations (78th percentile)
457% Outstanding
Read 1,929
Write 3,796
Mixed 2,433
SusWrite 3,911
688% 3,017 MB/s
4K Read 55.2
4K Write 168
4K Mixed 81.3
277% 102 MB/s
DQ Read 1,469
DQ Write 1,042
DQ Mixed 1,272
946% 1,261 MB/s
Poor: 137%
This bench: 457%
Great: 530%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Hynix HMCG78AGBSA092N 2x16GB
2 of 2 slots used
32GB SODIMM 22h clocked @ 5600 MHz
Performing way above expectations (97th percentile)
179% Outstanding
MC Read 76.7
MC Write 69.7
MC Mixed 67.4
204% 71.3 GB/s
SC Read 19.5
SC Write 48.7
SC Mixed 28
92% 32.1 GB/s
Latency 82.4
49% 82.4 ns
Poor: 105%
This bench: 179%
Great: 179%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 63 42 240 16" 2048 1280 CSO1624
Typical Blade 16 - RZ09-0483 Builds (Compare 181 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 21%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 109%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 23%
Surfboard

System: Razer Blade 16 - RZ09-0483

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $165Nvidia RTX 4060 $295WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $389WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $85
Intel Core i5-13600K $200Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback