Performance Results


Gaming 5% Tree trunk	Desktop 29% Raft	Workstation 4% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (32nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 68 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With an extremely low single core score, this CPU can barely handle email and light web browsing. Finally, with a gaming score of 25.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very poor.
Graphics	6.72% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive	44.7% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory	8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 9 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.

PC Performing below expectations (32^nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i7-2760QM-$130 10,423 User benchmarks, average bench 60% CPU 1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads Base clock 2.4 GHz Performing way below expectations (5^th percentile)	25.4% Poor	Memory 41.4 1-Core 14.9 2-Core 28.5 20% 28.3 Pts	4-Core 53 8-Core 72.6 8% 62.8 Pts	64-Core 76.5 5% 76.5 Pts
Poor: 27% ↑ This bench: 25.4% Great: 72%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
AMD FirePro M5950 1,394 User benchmarks, average bench 5% Dell(1028 04A3) 1GB Driver: aticfx64.dll Ver. 8.850.7.5000 Performing way above expectations (93^rd percentile)	6.72% Terrible	Lighting 8.27 Reflection 8.31 Parallax 6.53 7% 7.7 fps	MRender 8.19 Gravity 5.8 Splatting 9.87 7% 7.95 fps
Poor: 3% ↑ This bench: 6.72% Great: 7%

Drive	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung PM830 mSATA 256GB 9,379 User benchmarks, average bench 63% 57GB free (System drive) Firmware: CXM02D1Q Performing way below expectations (4^th percentile)	44.7% Average	Read 415 Write 229 Mixed 292 69% 312 MB/s	4K Read 11.7 4K Write 19 4K Mixed 9.81 40% 13.5 MB/s	DQ Read 34.6 DQ Write 47 DQ Mixed 21.5 22% 34.4 MB/s
Poor: 47% ↑ This bench: 44.7% Great: 80%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Hynix HMT351S6BFR8C-H9 2x4GB 8,137 User benchmarks, average bench 40% 2 of 4 slots used 8GB SODIMM DDR3 1333 MHz Performing below expectations (25^th percentile)	30.6% Below average	MC Read 12.9 MC Write 11.2 MC Mixed 12.2 35% 12.1 GB/s	SC Read 4 SC Write 3.2 SC Mixed 4.1 11% 3.77 GB/s	Latency 196 20% 196 ns
Poor: 19% ↑ This bench: 30.6% Great: 51%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 6%

Tree trunk

Desktop 54%

Yacht

Workstation 6%

Tree trunk

GPU
Quadro 1000MNvidiaBench 3%, 6,108 samples	227x
Quadro 2000MNvidiaBench 5%, 3,227 samples	170x
HD 3000 (Mobile V2 1.3 GHz)IntelBench 2%, 110,588 samples	85x

RAM
M471B5273DH0-CH9 2x4GBSamsungBench 43%, 15,815 samples	26x
HMT351S6CFR8C-H9 2x4GBHynixBench 43%, 6,386 samples	16x
M471B5273DH0-CH9 4x4GBSamsungBench 45%, 885 samples	12x

Value: 66% - Good

Total price: $113

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $32	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16