Asus PRIME X370-PRO

Performance Results


Gaming 67% Battle cruiser	Desktop 82% Aircraft carrier	Workstation 68% Battle cruiser


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (53rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 47 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 78.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics	80.2% is a very good 3D score, it's the business. This GPU can handle recent 3D games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive	104% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Motherboard	Asus PRIME X370-PRO (all builds)
Memory	11.2 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors, 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20170330
Uptime	1.2 Days
Run Date	Aug 24 '17 at 00:59
Run Duration	238 Seconds
Run User	USA-User
Background CPU	4%

PC Performing as expected (53^rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
AMD Ryzen 7 1700X-$211 66,470 User benchmarks, average bench 71% AM4, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads Base clock 3.75 GHz, turbo 3.75 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (91^st percentile)	78.5% Very good	Memory 72.9 1-Core 115 2-Core 231 77% 140 Pts	4-Core 450 8-Core 837 77% 644 Pts	64-Core 1,234 76% 1,234 Pts
Poor: 58% ↑ This bench: 78.5% Great: 80%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX Titan X-$615 15,621 User benchmarks, average bench 75% EVGA(3842 2992) CLim: 1519 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 12GB, Driver: 385.28 Performing way above expectations (87^th percentile)	80.2% Excellent	Lighting 103 Reflection 110 Parallax 99.2 84% 104 fps	MRender 86.3 Gravity 95.1 Splatting 87 73% 89.5 fps
Poor: 68% ↑ This bench: 80.2% Great: 83%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung 850 Evo 250GB-$100 951,591 User benchmarks, average bench 103% 37GB free (System drive) Firmware: EMT01B6Q Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing as expected (44^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (09) Power-on hours count 99 99 2876 (0C) Power cycle count 98 98 1157 (B1) Unknown 98 98 25 (B3) Unknown 100 100 0 (B5) Unknown 100 100 0 (B6) Unknown 100 100 0 (B7) Unknown 100 100 0 (BB) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (BE) vendor-specific 57 39 43 (C3) Hardware ECC recovered 200 200 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 100 100 0 (EB) Unknown 99 99 57 (F1) Unknown 99 99 9085603597	104% Outstanding	Read 512 Write 416 Mixed 420 100% 450 MB/s	4K Read 40.3 4K Write 77.4 4K Mixed 41.6 155% 53.1 MB/s	DQ Read 259 DQ Write 204 DQ Mixed 87.1 104% 183 MB/s
Poor: 72% ↑ This bench: 104% Great: 124%
Intel X25-M 80GB 12,660 User benchmarks, average bench 34% 14GB free Firmware: 2CV102HA Max speed: SATA 2.0 300 MB/s Performing way above expectations (87^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (03) Spinup time 100 100 0 (04) Start/Stop count 100 100 0 (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 8 (09) Power-on hours count 100 100 3510 (0C) Power cycle count 100 100 3122 (C0) Power-off retract count 100 100 133 (E1) Load/Unload cycle count 200 200 169411 (E2) Load-in time 100 100 79 (E3) Torque amplification count 100 100 2 (E4) Power-off retract count 100 100 943192214 (E8) Unknown 99 99 0 (E9) Unknown 97 97 0 (B8) Unknown 100 100 0	41.2% Average	Read 256 Write 78.1 Mixed 126 33% 153 MB/s	4K Read 21.4 4K Write 62.2 4K Mixed 7.26 75% 30.3 MB/s	DQ Read 155 DQ Write 78.2 DQ Mixed 35.2 48% 89.5 MB/s
Poor: 18% ↑ This bench: 41.2% Great: 44%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 1TB-$28 1,562,409 User benchmarks, average bench 89% 510GB free Firmware: CC46 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing way below expectations (18^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 116 99 103158520 (03) Spinup time 97 97 0 (04) Start/Stop count 100 100 794 (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (07) Seek error rate 100 253 507461 (09) Power-on hours count 98 98 2080 (0A) Spinup retry count 100 100 0 (0C) Power cycle count 100 100 837 (B7) Unknown 100 100 0 (B8) Unknown 100 100 0 (BB) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (BC) Unknown 100 100 0 (BD) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (BE) vendor-specific 62 43 855337599014 (BF) G-sense error rate 100 100 0 (C0) Power-off retract count 100 100 96 (C1) Load/Unload cycle count 97 97 7110 (C2) HDA temperature 38 57 81604378662 (C5) Current pending sector count 100 100 0 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 100 100 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 200 200 0 (F0) Head flying hours 100 253 113030654330161 (F1) Unknown 100 253 1127966047 (F2) Unknown 100 253 734067077	73% Very good	Read 157 Write 97 Mixed 91.2 86% 115 MB/s	4K Read 0.82 4K Write 1.56 4K Mixed 0.18 83% 0.86 MB/s
Poor: 55% ↑ This bench: 73% Great: 112%
WD WD25 00JS-58NCB1 250GB 17,984 User benchmarks, average bench 27% 60GB free Firmware: 20.06C04 Max speed: SATA 1.0 150 MB/s Performing as expected (58^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 200 200 0 (03) Spinup time 191 183 5441 (04) Start/Stop count 89 89 11050 (05) Reallocated sector count 200 200 0 (07) Seek error rate 200 200 0 (09) Power-on hours count 56 56 32424 (0A) Spinup retry count 100 100 0 (0B) Calibration retry count 100 100 0 (0C) Power cycle count 98 98 2458 (C2) HDA temperature 112 92 38 (C3) Hardware ECC recovered 165 131 322945 (C4) Reallocation count 200 200 0 (C5) Current pending sector count 200 200 0 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 200 200 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 200 200 0 (C8) Write error rate 200 200 0	29.1% Poor	Read 49.5 Write 51.6 Mixed 51.7 38% 50.9 MB/s	4K Read 0.64 4K Write 1.95 4K Mixed 0.37 104% 0.99 MB/s
Poor: 11% ↑ This bench: 29.1% Great: 35%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 1TB-$28 1,562,409 User benchmarks, average bench 89% 47GB free Firmware: CC45 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing way below expectations (7^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 118 99 196285776 (03) Spinup time 97 97 0 (04) Start/Stop count 99 99 1203 (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (07) Seek error rate 70 60 11828076 (09) Power-on hours count 97 97 3218 (0A) Spinup retry count 100 100 0 (0C) Power cycle count 99 99 1265 (B7) Unknown 100 100 0 (B8) Unknown 100 100 0 (BB) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (BC) Unknown 100 100 0 (BD) vendor-specific 99 99 1 (BE) vendor-specific 67 54 555155489 (BF) G-sense error rate 100 100 0 (C0) Power-off retract count 100 100 113 (C1) Load/Unload cycle count 91 91 18603 (C2) HDA temperature 33 46 81604378657 (C5) Current pending sector count 100 100 0 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 100 100 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 200 200 0 (F0) Head flying hours 100 253 -50414326118858 (F1) Unknown 100 253 6473853933 (F2) Unknown 100 253 67737475135	59.3% Above average	Read 118 Write 88.3 Mixed 104 78% 103 MB/s	4K Read 0.47 4K Write 1.73 4K Mixed 0.16 69% 0.79 MB/s
Poor: 55% ↑ This bench: 59.3% Great: 112%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Crucial BLS8G4D2 2x8GB 1,659 User benchmarks, average bench 78% 2 of 4 slots used 16GB DIMM DDR4 2400 MHz clocked @ 1200 MHz Performing below potential (33^rd percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP	77.8% Very good	MC Read 30.2 MC Write 26.6 MC Mixed 26.9 80% 27.9 GB/s	SC Read 20.2 SC Write 29.3 SC Mixed 24.4 70% 24.6 GB/s	Latency 94.8 42% 94.8 ns
Poor: 40% ↑ This bench: 77.8% Great: 92%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical PRIME X370-PRO Builds (Compare 2,536 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 74%

Battleship

Desktop 75%

Battleship

Workstation 72%

Battleship

Motherboard: Asus PRIME X370-PRO - $109

CPU
Ryzen 7 1700AMD $195Bench 69%, 144,475 samples	420x
Ryzen 7 1700XAMD $211Bench 71%, 66,470 samples	326x
Ryzen 5 1600AMD $110Bench 70%, 392,253 samples	204x

GPU
GTX 1080Nvidia $245Bench 102%, 1,082,454 samples	217x
GTX 1070Nvidia $132Bench 80%, 1,459,281 samples	194x
GTX 1060-6GBNvidia $117Bench 56%, 1,368,019 samples	189x

SSD
850 Evo 250GBSamsung $100Bench 103%, 951,591 samples	94x
850 Evo 500GBSamsung $90Bench 112%, 695,664 samples	89x
960 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 250GBSamsung $45Bench 199%, 240,629 samples	75x

RAM
Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GBCorsair $48Bench 82%, 606,405 samples	161x
Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GBCorsair $40Bench 85%, 653,654 samples	123x
Ripjaws V DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GBG.SKILL $36Bench 84%, 287,720 samples	57x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 80% - Excellent

Total price: $697

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $254	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $163	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16

Asus PRIME X370-PRO

Performance Results

PC Performing as expected (53rd percentile)

System Memory Latency Ladder

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

Motherboard: Asus PRIME X370-PRO - $109

Feedback

PC Performing as expected (53^rd percentile)