Gigabyte GA-AX370-Gaming K7

Performance Results


Gaming 92% Nuclear submarine	Desktop 82% Aircraft carrier	Workstation 89% Aircraft carrier


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (57th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 43 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 78.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics	113% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive	84.8% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Motherboard	Gigabyte GA-AX370-Gaming K7 (all builds)
Memory	12.9 GB free of 16 GB @ 3.2 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20170616
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Jul 25 '17 at 15:37
Run Duration	152 Seconds
Run User	USA-User
Background CPU	2%

PC Performing as expected (57^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
AMD Ryzen 7 1700-$195 144,475 User benchmarks, average bench 69% AM4, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads Base clock 3 GHz, turbo 3.15 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (94^th percentile)	78.7% Very good	Memory 84.1 1-Core 97.7 2-Core 197 72% 126 Pts	4-Core 394 8-Core 756 68% 575 Pts	64-Core 1,066 66% 1,066 Pts
Poor: 59% ↑ This bench: 78.7% Great: 81%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1080-Ti-$485 840,268 User benchmarks, average bench 124% Gigabyte(1458 3751) CLim: 2037 MHz, MLim: 2808 MHz, Ram: 11GB, Driver: 382.33 Performing below potential (12^th percentile) - GPU OC Guide	113% Outstanding	Lighting 140 Reflection 194 Parallax 184 114% 172 fps	MRender 131 Gravity 180 Splatting 131 119% 147 fps
Poor: 109% ↑ This bench: 113% Great: 133%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung 850 Pro 128GB-$70 18,195 User benchmarks, average bench 99% 6GB free (System drive) Firmware: EXM01B6Q Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing way below expectations (18^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (09) Power-on hours count 97 97 13871 (0C) Power cycle count 98 98 1667 (B1) Unknown 97 97 129 (B3) Unknown 100 100 0 (B5) Unknown 100 100 0 (B6) Unknown 100 100 0 (B7) Unknown 100 100 0 (BB) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (BE) vendor-specific 64 58 36 (C3) Hardware ECC recovered 200 200 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 99 99 8 (EB) Unknown 99 99 382 (F1) Unknown 99 99 28333957165	84.8% Excellent	Read 520 Write 219 Mixed 298 76% 346 MB/s	4K Read 34.3 4K Write 90.9 4K Mixed 28.4 136% 51.2 MB/s	DQ Read 246 DQ Write 203 DQ Mixed 99.9 109% 183 MB/s
Poor: 71% ↑ This bench: 84.8% Great: 119%
Seagate ST9320320AS 320GB-$60 2,404 User benchmarks, average bench 27% 298GB free Firmware: SD03 Max speed: SATA 2.0 300 MB/s Performing way above expectations (95^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 117 99 135722123 (03) Spinup time 99 99 0 (04) Start/Stop count 100 100 804 (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (07) Seek error rate 78 60 71021048 (09) Power-on hours count 94 94 5884 (0A) Spinup retry count 100 100 0 (0C) Power cycle count 100 100 757 (B8) Unknown 100 100 0 (BB) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (BC) Unknown 100 99 262153 (BD) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (BE) vendor-specific 69 37 2513077207071 (BF) G-sense error rate 100 100 24 (C0) Power-off retract count 100 100 96 (C1) Load/Unload cycle count 1 1 239765 (C2) HDA temperature 31 63 30064771103 (C3) Hardware ECC recovered 49 43 135722123 (C5) Current pending sector count 100 100 0 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 100 100 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 200 200 0	37.2% Below average	Read 63.2 Write 66.2 Mixed 63.1 48% 64.2 MB/s	4K Read 0.5 4K Write 1.12 4K Mixed 0.35 81% 0.66 MB/s
Poor: 11% ↑ This bench: 37.2% Great: 37%
BUFFALO HD-PATU3 1TB 73 User benchmarks, average bench 36% 925GB free, PID 021c Operating at USB 3.0 Speed Performing above expectations (75^th percentile)	41.1% Average	Read 95.1 Write 103 Mixed 94.4 127% 97.6 MB/s	4K Read 0.58 4K Write 1.53 4K Mixed 0.39 67% 0.83 MB/s
Poor: 12% ↑ This bench: 41.1% Great: 46%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
G.SKILL F4 DDR4 3200 C14 2x8GB 20,017 User benchmarks, average bench 92% 2 of 4 slots used 16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3200 MHz Performing as expected (50^th percentile)	93.9% Outstanding	MC Read 41.3 MC Write 30 MC Mixed 28.7 95% 33.3 GB/s	SC Read 23.7 SC Write 41.5 SC Mixed 27.4 88% 30.9 GB/s	Latency 73.3 55% 73.3 ns
Poor: 61% ↑ This bench: 93.9% Great: 122%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical GA-AX370-Gaming K7 Builds (Compare 524 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 79%

Battleship

Desktop 79%

Battleship

Workstation 77%

Battleship

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-AX370-Gaming K7 - $229

CPU
Ryzen 7 1800XAMD $60Bench 72%, 30,050 samples	96x
Ryzen 7 1700XAMD $211Bench 71%, 66,470 samples	69x
Ryzen 7 1700AMD $195Bench 69%, 144,475 samples	59x

GPU
GTX 1080Nvidia $400Bench 102%, 1,082,454 samples	67x
GTX 1080-TiNvidia $485Bench 124%, 840,268 samples	57x
GTX 1070Nvidia $132Bench 80%, 1,459,281 samples	29x

SSD
850 Evo 500GBSamsung $94Bench 112%, 695,664 samples	22x
960 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 500GBSamsung $43Bench 213%, 165,668 samples	21x
960 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 250GBSamsung $45Bench 199%, 240,629 samples	17x

RAM
Flare X DDR4 3200 C14 2x8GBG.SKILL $73Bench 98%, 54,616 samples	20x
Ripjaws V DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GBG.SKILL $36Bench 84%, 287,720 samples	18x
Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GBCorsair $43Bench 82%, 606,405 samples	11x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 66% - Good

Total price: $856

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273	Nvidia RTX 4060 $295	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $184	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16

Gigabyte GA-AX370-Gaming K7

Performance Results

PC Performing as expected (57th percentile)

System Memory Latency Ladder

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-AX370-Gaming K7 - $229

Feedback

PC Performing as expected (57^th percentile)