| PC Status | Overall this PC is performing below expectations (40th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 60 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas. |
| Processor | With a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 43.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average. |
| Graphics | 1.73% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics) |
| Boot Drive | The boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times. |
| Memory | 8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system. |
| OS Version | Although Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 9 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager. |
| Motherboard | Asus P5K SE (all builds) |
| Memory | 5.5 GB free of 8 GB @ 0.7 GHz |
| Display | 1024 x 768 - 32 Bit colors |
| OS | Windows 7 |
| BIOS Date | 20070719 |
| Uptime | 0 Days |
| Run Date | Mar 15 '17 at 18:05 |
| Run Duration | 179 Seconds |
| Run User | BRA-User |
| Background CPU | 2% |
PC Performing below expectations (40th percentile)
Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).
| Processor | Bench | Normal | Heavy | Server |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
43.6%
Average
|
35% 50.4 Pts
|
15% 109 Pts
|
7% 111 Pts
|
| Graphics Card | Bench | 3D DX9 | 3D DX10 | 3D DX11 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Nvidia GeForce 8600 GT
Device(0000 0000) 512MB
Ram: 512MB, Driver: 341.44
|
1.73%
Terrible
|
2% 2.13 fps
|
2% 2.23 fps
| |
| Drives | Bench | Sequential | Random 4k | Deep queue 4k |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 1TB-$32
672GB free (System drive)
Firmware: CC45 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
|
87.6%
Excellent
|
97% 130 MB/s
|
78% 0.82 MB/s
| |
|
|
26%
Poor
|
29% 39.3 MB/s
|
106% 1.01 MB/s
| |
|
WD WD1600BB-22GUC0 160GB
26GB free
Firmware: 15.05R15 Max speed: UDMA 100 100 MB/s
|
13.4%
Very poor
|
16% 21.4 MB/s
|
85% 0.75 MB/s
| |
| Memory Kit | Bench | Multi core | Single core | Latency |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Unknown 4x2GB
4 of 4 slots used
8GB DIMM DDR2
Performing below potential (23rd percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP |
17.1%
Very poor
|
15% 5.33 GB/s
|
13% 4.63 GB/s
|
38% 104 ns
|
System Memory Latency Ladder
L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds
Typical P5K SE Builds (Compare 210 builds)
See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
|
|
|
Motherboard: Asus P5K SE
| CPU |
|
|---|---|
| Core2 Quad Q6600Intel $100Bench 42%, 59,658 samples | 37x |
| Core2 Duo E6550Intel $15Bench 37%, 11,349 samples | 17x |
| Core2 Duo E8200Intel $12Bench 40%, 4,318 samples | 13x |
| GPU |
|
|---|---|
| GeForce 9600 GTNvidiaBench 4%, 20,826 samples | 9x |
| GeForce GT 730NvidiaBench 5%, 164,888 samples | 9x |
| GeForce 8600 GTNvidiaBench 2%, 8,099 samples | 8x |
| EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER | Value: 55% - Above average | Total price: $100 |