Toshiba dynabook Qosmio T953/T8J

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 9%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 68%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 8%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (74th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 26 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 71.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics4.61% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive26.9% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 9 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.
Run History
SystemToshiba dynabook Qosmio T953/T8J  (all builds)
MotherboardTOSHIBA VG10S
Memory4.8 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 7
BIOS Date20131118
Uptime0 Days
Run DateMay 25 '16 at 14:33
Run Duration78 Seconds
Run User TWN-User
Background CPU5%

 PC Performing above expectations (74th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-4700MQ-$209
SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 2.4 GHz
Performing way above expectations (98th percentile)
71.6% Very good
Memory 92.1
1-Core 98.2
2-Core 182
74% 124 Pts
4-Core 277
8-Core 411
43% 344 Pts
64-Core 411
25% 411 Pts
Poor: 32%
This bench: 71.6%
Great: 71%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel HD 4600 (Mobile 1.15 GHz)
Toshiba(1179 FA46) 2GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 9.18.10.3293
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
4.61% Terrible
Lighting 5.07
Reflection 6.69
Parallax 6.16
4% 5.97 fps
MRender 9.86
Gravity 2.37
Splatting 7.91
6% 6.71 fps
Poor: 2%
This bench: 4.61%
Great: 3%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Adata SP900 256GB-$300
85GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 5.8.2 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing below potential (0th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
26.9% Poor
Read 259
Write 101
Mixed 149
37% 170 MB/s
4K Read 13
4K Write 4.23
4K Mixed 9.19
34% 8.79 MB/s
Poor: 53%
This bench: 26.9%
Great: 89%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Hynix HMT451S6MFR8A-PB 2x4GB
2 of 2 slots used
8GB SODIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz
Performing way above expectations (99th percentile)
56.9% Above average
MC Read 21.1
MC Write 20.7
MC Mixed 16.9
56% 19.6 GB/s
SC Read 15
SC Write 18.3
SC Mixed 17.8
49% 17 GB/s
Latency 63.9
63% 63.9 ns
Poor: 18%
This bench: 56.9%
Great: 56%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273Nvidia RTX 4060 $295Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $177Nvidia RTX 4070 $539Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback