Xxxxxx Satellite X205

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing CPU, SSD, RAM
Gaming 0% Incomplete	Desktop 0% Incomplete	Workstation 0% Incomplete


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing way above expectations (91st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 9 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. This PC is likely operated by a technical master!
Graphics	2.55% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	The boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory	3GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 3GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 9 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.

High background CPU (29%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

System	Xxxxxx Satellite X205 (all builds)
Motherboard	XXXXXX ISRAA
Memory	1.8 GB free of 3 GB @ 0.7 GHz
Display	1440 x 900 - 32 Bit colors,
OS	Windows 7
BIOS Date	20101213
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Dec 10 '14 at 11:25
Run Duration	121 Seconds
Run User	CYP-User
Background CPU	29%

PC Performing way above expectations (91^st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core2 Duo T8300-$27 2,604 User benchmarks, average bench 37% U2E1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 2 threads Base clock 2.4 GHz Relative performance n/a - benchmarks incomplete		1-Core 40.5 2-Core 62.8 24% 51.7 Pts	4-Core 73.1 8-Core 70.9 10% 72 Pts	64-Core 76.5 5% 76.5 Pts
Poor: 26% Great: 41%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GeForce 8600M GT 2,041 User benchmarks, average bench 1% Toshiba(1179 FF00) 256MB Driver: nvd3dumx.dll Ver. 9.18.13.4052 Performing way above expectations (100^th percentile)	2.55% Terrible	Lighting 3.27 Reflection 3.5 Parallax 0.62 3% 2.46 fps	MRender 3.95 Gravity 1.57 Splatting 3.04 2% 2.85 fps
Poor: 1% ↑ This bench: 2.55% Great: 2%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k
Hitachi HTS722016K9SA00 160GB-$31 340 User benchmarks, average bench 24% 149GB free Firmware: DCDO Max speed: SATA 1.0 150 MB/s Performing way above expectations (97^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 100 100 0 (02) Throughput performance 100 100 0 (03) Spinup time 121 121 64424509441 (04) Start/Stop count 100 100 1552 (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (07) Seek error rate 100 100 0 (08) Seek timer performance 100 100 0 (09) Power-on hours count 65 65 15441 (0A) Spinup retry count 100 100 0 (0C) Power cycle count 100 100 1474 (BF) G-sense error rate 100 100 0 (C0) Power-off retract count 100 100 67 (C1) Load/Unload cycle count 80 80 207023 (C2) HDA temperature 161 161 244814118946 (C4) Reallocation count 100 100 0 (C5) Current pending sector count 100 100 0 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 100 100 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 200 200 0 (DF) Load/unload retry count 100 100 0	31.6% Below average	Read 54.4 Write 55.6 Mixed 52.2 41% 54.1 MB/s	4K Read 0.52 4K Write 0.92 4K Mixed 0.4 84% 0.62 MB/s
Poor: 15% ↑ This bench: 31.6% Great: 32%
Hitachi HTS722016K9SA00 160GB-$31 340 User benchmarks, average bench 24% 100GB free (System drive) Firmware: DCDO Max speed: SATA 1.0 150 MB/s Performing above expectations (77^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 100 100 0 (02) Throughput performance 100 100 0 (03) Spinup time 168 168 68719476737 (04) Start/Stop count 100 100 1558 (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (07) Seek error rate 100 100 0 (08) Seek timer performance 100 100 0 (09) Power-on hours count 65 65 15550 (0A) Spinup retry count 100 100 0 (0C) Power cycle count 100 100 1474 (BF) G-sense error rate 100 100 0 (C0) Power-off retract count 100 100 157 (C1) Load/Unload cycle count 51 51 492950 (C2) HDA temperature 141 141 240519086119 (C4) Reallocation count 100 100 0 (C5) Current pending sector count 100 100 0 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 100 100 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 200 200 0 (DF) Load/unload retry count 100 100 0	28.3% Poor	Read 47.5 Write 51 Mixed 48.7 37% 49.1 MB/s	4K Read 0.54 4K Write 0.98 4K Mixed 0.32 76% 0.61 MB/s
Poor: 15% ↑ This bench: 28.3% Great: 32%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical Satellite X205 Builds (Compare 2 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 2%

Tree trunk

Desktop 39%

Jet ski

Workstation 2%

Tree trunk

System: Xxxxxx Satellite X205

CPU
Core2 Duo T9300Intel $70Bench 38%, 3,287 samples	2x

GPU
GeForce 8700M GTNvidiaBench 2%, 317 samples	2x

SSD
X110 128GBSanDisk $89Bench 71%, 11,245 samples	2x

RAM
2x2GBUnknownBench 20%, 446,702 samples	2x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 28% - Poor

Total price: $159

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $254	Nvidia RTX 4060 $293	Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $175	Nvidia RTX 4070 $550	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $32	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16

Xxxxxx Satellite X205

Performance Results

PC Performing way above expectations (91st percentile)

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

System: Xxxxxx Satellite X205

Feedback

PC Performing way above expectations (91^st percentile)