Asus M5A97 EVO R2.0

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 16%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 68%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 14%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (53rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 47 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 62.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics18.7% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive94.2% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (17%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
MotherboardAsus M5A97 EVO R2.0  (all builds)
Memory9 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit couleurs
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20121107
Uptime17.2 Days
Run DateAug 10 '18 at 16:35
Run Duration203 Seconds
Run User FRA-User
Background CPU 17%

 PC Performing as expected (53rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD FX-8300-$168
Socket 942, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.3 GHz, turbo 3.25 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (92nd percentile)
62.6% Good
Memory 86.1
1-Core 59.7
2-Core 110
55% 85.3 Pts
4-Core 214
8-Core 335
34% 274 Pts
64-Core 354
22% 354 Pts
Poor: 48%
This bench: 62.6%
Great: 64%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 750-Ti-$92
Gainward(10B0 1380) 2GB
CLim: 1359 MHz, MLim: 1375 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 391.35
Performing way above expectations (96th percentile)
18.7% Very poor
Lighting 23.4
Reflection 17.7
Parallax 21.1
19% 20.7 fps
MRender 26
Gravity 23.9
Splatting 17.7
18% 22.5 fps
Poor: 16%
This bench: 18.7%
Great: 19%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 850 Evo 250GB-$100
67GB free (System drive)
Firmware: EMT02B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 353 298 298 286 299 302 MB/s
Performing below expectations (24th percentile)
94.2% Outstanding
Read 462
Write 411
Mixed 352
SusWrite 306
86% 383 MB/s
4K Read 35.2
4K Write 64
4K Mixed 45.3
145% 48.2 MB/s
DQ Read 277
DQ Write 239
DQ Mixed 257
193% 258 MB/s
Poor: 72%
This bench: 94.2%
Great: 124%
WD Blue 2.5" 500GB (2009)-$50
256GB free
Firmware: 01.01A01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 2.6 3.2 1 7.7 4.3 3.6 MB/s
Relative performance (0th percentile)
2.21% Terrible
Read 4
Write 1
Mixed 2.7
SusWrite 3.7
2% 2.85 MB/s
4K Read 0.1
4K Write 0
4K Mixed 0
4% 0.03 MB/s
Poor: 15%
This bench: 2.21%
Great: 43%
Toshiba MK1652GSX 160GB-$30
23GB free
Firmware: LV020J
SusWrite @10s intervals: 38 38 38 36 37 37 MB/s
Performing below expectations (33rd percentile)
22.1% Poor
Read 39.3
Write 38
Mixed 27.7
SusWrite 37.3
26% 35.6 MB/s
4K Read 0.4
4K Write 1.2
4K Mixed 0.5
94% 0.7 MB/s
Poor: 12%
This bench: 22.1%
Great: 34%
Intenso Rainbow Line 32GB
29GB free, PID 6387
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
Relative performance n/a - benchmarks incomplete
Read 16.5
11% 16.5 MB/s
4K Read 3.5
4K Mixed 0
20% 1.75 MB/s
Poor: 2% Great: 7%
IS917 innostor 8GB
7GB free, PID 0917
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 12 13 13 13 13 12 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (18th percentile)
7.5% Terrible
Read 23.5
Write 12.5
Mixed 14.3
SusWrite 12.5
20% 15.7 MB/s
4K Read 4.5
4K Write 0.1
4K Mixed 0.7
44% 1.77 MB/s
Poor: 7%
This bench: 7.5%
Great: 26%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Corsair CMX8GX3M2A2000C9 F3-2133C10-4GAB CMX8GX3M2A2000C9 F3-2133C10-4GAB 16GB
1600, 1600, 1600, 1600 MHz
4096, 4096, 4096, 4096 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
49.7% Average
MC Read 20.4
MC Write 15.5
MC Mixed 18.1
51% 18 GB/s
SC Read 9.7
SC Write 8.8
SC Mixed 12.7
30% 10.4 GB/s
Latency 71.2
56% 71.2 ns

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical M5A97 EVO R2.0 Builds (Compare 581 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 38%
Jet ski
Desktop
Desktop 69%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 31%
Sail boat

Motherboard: Asus M5A97 EVO R2.0 - $166

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 70% - Very good Total price: $512
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273Nvidia RTX 4060 $295Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $177Nvidia RTX 4070 $539Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback