| PC Status | Overall this PC is performing as expected (50th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 50 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. |
| Processor | With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 59.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average. |
| Graphics | 28.5% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics) |
| Boot Drive | 30.1% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times. |
| Memory | 6GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 6GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system. |
| OS Version | Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option. |
Sub-optimal background CPU (14%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
| Motherboard | Asus P8H61-M LE/USB3 (all builds) |
| Memory | 3.7 GB free of 6 GB @ 1.3 GHz |
| Display | 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit Farben |
| OS | Windows 10 |
| BIOS Date | 20110926 |
| Uptime | 0 Days |
| Run Date | Jul 26 '18 at 12:22 |
| Run Duration | 134 Seconds |
| Run User | DEU-User |
| Background CPU | 14% |
PC Performing as expected (50th percentile)
Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).
| Processor | Bench | Normal | Heavy | Server |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
59.1%
Above average
|
62% 101 Pts
|
25% 186 Pts
|
12% 201 Pts
|
| Graphics Card | Bench | 3D DX9 | 3D DX10 | 3D DX11 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Nvidia GTX 1050-$101
CLim: 1961 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 388.13
|
28.5%
Poor
|
29% 31 fps
|
28% 33.9 fps
| |
| Drives | Bench | Sequential | Random 4k | Deep queue 4k |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
WD Green 240GB (2018)-$35
195GB free (System drive)
Firmware: UF360000
SusWrite @10s intervals: 84 102 100 96 94 86 MB/s
|
30.1%
Below average
|
28% 128 MB/s
|
50% 15.8 MB/s
|
13% 19.2 MB/s
|
|
UFD 3.0 Silicon-Power64G 64GB
15GB free, PID 5500
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 9.6 8.9 12 11 12 11 MB/s
|
8.28%
Terrible
|
22% 18 MB/s
|
22% 1.67 MB/s
| |
| Memory Kit | Bench | Multi core | Single core | Latency |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Unknown Team--Elite-1333 6GB
1333, 1333 MHz
4096, 2048 MB
|
40.2%
Average
|
38% 13.3 GB/s
|
36% 12.7 GB/s
|
57% 70.4 ns
|
System Memory Latency Ladder
L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds
Typical P8H61-M LE/USB3 Builds (Compare 633 builds)
See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
|
|
|
Motherboard: Asus P8H61-M LE/USB3
| CPU |
|
|---|---|
| Core i5-2400Intel $250Bench 61%, 166,255 samples | 78x |
| Core i7-2600Intel $194Bench 67%, 185,630 samples | 69x |
| Core i3-2100Intel $49Bench 51%, 63,701 samples | 66x |
| GPU |
|
|---|---|
| HD 2000 (Desktop 1.1 GHz)IntelBench 1%, 150,891 samples | 71x |
| GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples | 46x |
| GTX 750-TiNvidia $92Bench 17%, 309,423 samples | 39x |
| EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER | Value: 58% - Above average | Total price: $278 |