Lenovo 20240

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing CPU, SSD
Gaming 0% Incomplete	Desktop 0% Incomplete	Workstation 0% Incomplete


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (25th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 75 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Graphics	1.01% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	The boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Very high background CPU (100%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

System	Lenovo 20240 (all builds)
Motherboard	LENOVO Lenovo G505
Memory	12.6 GB free of 16 GB @ 0.8 GHz
Display	1366 x 768 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20130917
Uptime	0.1 Days
Run Date	Jul 25 '18 at 17:06
Run Duration	285 Seconds
Run User	GBR-User
Background CPU	100%

PC Performing below expectations (25^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
AMD E1-2100 APU 4,569 User benchmarks, average bench 17% Socket FT1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 2 threads Base clock 1 GHz, turbo 1 GHz (avg) Relative performance n/a - benchmarks incomplete		1-Core 8.3 2-Core 12.1 5% 10.2 Pts	4-Core 22.6 8-Core 18.8 3% 20.7 Pts	64-Core 14.7 1% 14.7 Pts
Poor: 6% Great: 26%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
AMD HD 8210 4,832 User benchmarks, average bench 1% Legend(17AA 3802) 512MB Driver: aticfx64.dll Ver. 15.200.1055.0 Performing as expected (51^st percentile)	1.01% Terrible	Lighting 1.07 Reflection 2.23 Parallax 1.53 1% 1.61 fps	MRender 1.67 Gravity 0.97 Splatting 1.96 1% 1.53 fps
Poor: 1% ↑ This bench: 1.01% Great: 1%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k
Seagate Momentus 2.5" 1TB 266,123 User benchmarks, average bench 42% 802GB free (System drive) Firmware: 2AR20002 SusWrite @10s intervals: 71 85 68 59 59 56 MB/s Performing below expectations (39^th percentile)	40% Below average	Read 72.7 Write 84.5 Mixed 44.8 SusWrite 66.4 49% 67.1 MB/s	4K Read 0.4 4K Write 1.8 4K Mixed 0.7 128% 0.97 MB/s
Poor: 14% ↑ This bench: 40% Great: 59%
Seagate M3 2TB 1,454 User benchmarks, average bench 42% 156GB free Firmware: 0707 SusWrite @10s intervals: 37 41 37 33 32 31 MB/s Performing way below expectations (10^th percentile)	16% Very poor	Read 19.8 Write 32.9 Mixed 31.5 SusWrite 35.3 22% 29.9 MB/s	4K Read 0.4 4K Write 2.2 4K Mixed 0.2 80% 0.93 MB/s
Poor: 14% ↑ This bench: 16% Great: 67%
Freecom Mobile Drive XXS 320GB 94 User benchmarks, average bench 16% 245GB free, PID fc88 Operating at USB 2.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 20 21 19 19 19 19 MB/s Performing way below expectations (13^th percentile)	10.9% Very poor	Read 21.7 Write 19.5 Mixed 20 SusWrite 19.8 28% 20.2 MB/s	4K Read 0.4 4K Write 1.1 4K Mixed 0.5 56% 0.67 MB/s
Poor: 11% ↑ This bench: 10.9% Great: 21%
Toshiba External USB 3.0 2TB 1,922 User benchmarks, average bench 40% 306GB free, PID d010 Operating at USB 3.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 3.1 3.4 3.1 4.5 5.1 5 MB/s Performing below expectations (33^rd percentile)	35.5% Below average	Read 190 Write 4.2 Mixed 8.9 SusWrite 4 38% 51.8 MB/s	4K Read 23.3 4K Write 0.5 4K Mixed 1.1 141% 8.3 MB/s
Poor: 15% ↑ This bench: 35.5% Great: 58%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown 1GX64V160K 2x8GB 159 User benchmarks, average bench 52% 2 of 2 slots used 16GB SODIMM DDR3 800 MHz clocked @ 667 MHz Performing below potential (1^st percentile) - Ensure that the top XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP	6.64% Terrible	MC Read 2.6 MC Write 2.1 MC Mixed 2.8 7% 2.5 GB/s	SC Read 0.9 SC Write 1.5 SC Mixed 1.3 4% 1.23 GB/s	Latency 709 6% 709 ns
Poor: 30% ↑ This bench: 6.64% Great: 62%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical 20240 Builds (Compare 76 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 2%

Tree trunk

Desktop 21%

Surfboard

Workstation 2%

Tree trunk

System: Lenovo 20240

CPU
E1-2100 APUAMDBench 17%, 4,569 samples	33x
A4-5000 APUAMDBench 27%, 10,330 samples	26x
A6-5200 APUAMDBench 30%, 10,450 samples	15x

GPU
HD 8210AMDBench 1%, 4,832 samples	33x
Radeon HD 8330AMDBench 2%, 8,573 samples	26x
Radeon HD 8400-R3AMDBench 2%, 11,968 samples	14x

SSD
860 Evo 250GBSamsung $52Bench 104%, 296,814 samples	4x
A400 240GBKingston $28Bench 66%, 424,288 samples	3x
860 Evo 500GBSamsung $80Bench 105%, 762,998 samples	2x

RAM
RMT3170EB68F9W1600 1x4GBRamaxelBench 27%, 4,598 samples	6x
HMT451S6AFR8A-PB 1x4GBHynixBench 25%, 19,285 samples	5x
RMT3170EF68F9W1600 1x4GBRamaxelBench 28%, 4,466 samples	5x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 22% - Poor

Total price: $52

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $132	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $186	Nvidia RTX 4070 $409	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $32	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $35	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16